Monday, January 07, 2008

Kenya, The Next Shari'a State?

Kenya’s privileged tribe is on the run.

Christophe Calais for The New York Times - Kikuyus in Nakuru, Kenya, were part of a mass exodus trying to get to Kenya’s central highlands.

Over the past few days, tens of thousands of Kikuyus, the tribe of Kenya’s president, have packed into heavily guarded buses to flee the western part of the country because of ethnic violence. On Sunday, endless convoys of buses — some with their windshields smashed by rocks — crawled across a landscape of scorched homes and empty farms.

It is nothing short of a mass exodus. The tribe that has dominated business and politics in Kenya since independence in 1963 is now being chased off its land by machete-wielding mobs made up of members of other tribes furious about the Dec. 27 election, which Kenya’s president, Mwai Kibaki, won under dubious circumstances. In some places, Kikuyus have been hunted down with bows and arrows.

The hospital in Nakuru, a town in the Rift Valley, is full of Kikuyu men with deep ax wounds, fingers cut off and slash marks across their faces.


The New York Times is calling it Ethnic violence. But is it merely that?

Melanie Phillips, The Spectator Blog writes - While I was away, reading about the appalling atrocities in Kenya in which churches were torched and dozens of Christians burned to death, I wondered whether any mainstream media would get the point. They didn’t. As far as I could see, the violence was universally ascribed to ‘tribal conflict’. But this isn’t the first time churches in Kenya have been torched, as you can read here (date unknown):

On 13 June, Muslims rioting over the arrest of one of their clerics torched five churches in Bura, Tana River district, not far from Mombasa in Kenya… As impunity equals permission, this is a serious issue of national significance at a time when Muslim tensions are rising to boiling point. or here from 2001: Anglican Archbishop David Gitari and an interfaith team confronted rioting Muslim youths armed with swords and clubs on December 1 in Nairobi, Kenya. In response to this attempt to quell Kenya's worst outbreak of violence between Christians and Muslims, the rioters pelted the archbishop and his team with rocks. Moderate Muslim leaders plucked Gitari from the mob and rushed him to a nearby hospital, where he was treated for head injuries. ‘I survived only because Muslim leaders formed a human shield around me and in the process got more injured than myself,’ Gitari later said in local media reports. Or here from 2003: Muslim leaders in Kenya are threatening armed conflict if the new Kenyan constitution does not enshrine Islamic courts (known in Kenya as Kadhi courts).

For years, Kenya has been subjected to creeping Islamisation and jihadi violence by elements within the country’s ten per cent Muslims against the Christian majority. Yet unaccountably there was no mention of this key fact in the media coverage of the post-election violence. Well, fancy!

In the Christian Post, this article, (which was picked up by Stephen Pollard) written before the disputed election which led to the violence, put events in a rather more accurate context. Raila Odinga, it said, who was then the current presidential frontrunner, had promised to implement strict Islamic Sharia law if he received the Muslim vote and was elected president. Odinga had signed a secret memorandum of understanding with Sheikh Abdullahi Abdi, chairman of the National Leaders Forum, in which Odinga had allegedly stated his intention, if elected, to ‘within six months, rewrite the Constitution of Kenya to recognize Sharia as the only true law sanctioned by the Holy Quran for Muslim declared regions’.

The Evangelical Alliance of Kenya released a statement in which church leaders said Odinga ‘comes across as a presumptive Muslim president bent on forcing Islamic law, religion and culture down the throats of the Kenyan people in total disregard of the Constitutionally guaranteed rights of freedom of worship and equal protection of the law for all Kenyans.’

The Africa regional manager for International Christian Concern, Darara Gubo, said the agreement ‘undermines the secular nature of Kenya and opens a Pandora’s box of chaos and conflict similar to what happened in Nigeria and Sudan. This is not a stand-alone incident; rather, it is part of strategy to Islamize Eastern Africa and the Horn of Africa, through the introduction of Sharia law’.

Subsequently Joshua Hammer wrote a piece in the New York Times which, without going so far as to join up all the dots (please, this is the NYT!), nevertheless provided a hint of the same, ahem, context. Writing about sitting Kenyan MP Joseph Lekuton, he described his challenger, Godana Harugura, as… a convert to fundamentalist Islam who had reportedly raised money from Muslims along Kenya’s volatile border with Somalia by promising to ‘reclaim’ the region for Islam — and by attacking Lekuton for inviting Christian development groups into the area…Indeed, in the view of some of Lekuton’s supporters the election was shaping up to be a proxy confrontation between the West and Islam — a clash of civilizations in the Kenyan bush… A sizable, largely poor Muslim population concentrated along the coast — and proximity to the volatile states in the Horn of Africa, including Somalia and Sudan — have made Kenya especially vulnerable, in the views of counterterrorism experts, to the call for jihad. Since the early 1990s, the mosques of Mombasa and other towns have resonated with militant Islamic rhetoric. Radical imams have preached violence against Westerners, attacked the Kenyan government as the lackey of the United States and Israel and called for the implementation of Shariah. Members of the Qaeda cells that blew up the U.S. embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, on Aug. 7, 1998, were recruited in mosques near the Indian Ocean beaches where hundreds of thousands of Western tourists flock each year.

Apart from that, I have found plenty of worthy hand-wringing in the mainstream media about tribal violence between equally bloodthirsty Kenyan sectarian groups, but diddly squat about the Kenyan jihad and the remorseless creation of Africastan.

48 Comments:

Blogger Brooke said...

It's a possibility.

7/1/08 7:18 AM  
Blogger nanc said...

o.t. - i have a surprise for youuuuuuuuu!

7/1/08 9:45 AM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

Since the whole country is ready to go up, Farmer, should it be a surprise that Kikuyus would want to move to the area of their greatest strength?

7/1/08 9:56 AM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

If your man, Raila Odinga, Barack Obama's good family friend could control his people, they wouldn't have to retreat to the central highlands and revert to tribal (vs national) protection.

But what can you expect from an a-h*le who names his kids after Fidel Castro and Winnie Mandela...

7/1/08 10:52 AM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

Wow, nanc... Now, what else do I win? ;-)

7/1/08 10:53 AM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

That may be Farmer but you're waving the sharia flag for no apparent reason.

7/1/08 11:24 AM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

I would never do that, mr. ducky...

In the Christian Post, this article, (which was picked up by Stephen Pollard) written before the disputed election which led to the violence, put events in a rather more accurate context. Raila Odinga, it said, who was then the current presidential frontrunner, had promised to implement strict Islamic Sharia law if he received the Muslim vote and was elected president. Odinga had signed a secret memorandum of understanding with Sheikh Abdullahi Abdi, chairman of the National Leaders Forum, in which Odinga had allegedly stated his intention, if elected, to ‘within six months, rewrite the Constitution of Kenya to recognize Sharia as the only true law sanctioned by the Holy Quran for Muslim declared regions’.

...and believe me... the country has already seen one recent, but unsuccessful attempt at a Constitutional re-write.

And there is, evidently, an MOU between the Moslems and Odinga. I say, show us the documents!

7/1/08 1:30 PM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

...all of them, including any SECRET codicils.

7/1/08 1:33 PM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

They DO seem to be targetting churches for violence.

7/1/08 1:35 PM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

...and the main culprits are members of the Luo tribe...

Barack Obama's dad's (a Moslem)clan...

7/1/08 1:47 PM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

In other parts of Kenya...

The Minister for Internal Security John Michuki has directed all police officers in the country to desist from taking any inclinations when dealing with lawlessness.

The minister has also banned the carrying of offensive weapons in areas rocked by clashes in the country.

Michuki who was speaking after meeting leaders from Kuresoi in Molo district Thursday said a police helicopter would be stationed in Nakuru to assist the officers' monitor the situation in Kuresoi area of Molo district.

He at the same time said that anyone found inciting the public to lawlessness would be arrested irrespective of his or her position in society.

Political leaders from across the divide have called for an end to the skirmishes, which have left at least 16 people dead, and many others displaced in the past few weeks.

Michuki meeting with more than 350 security officers and leaders from the Molo and Kuresoi region, warned that such politicians would be arrested and charged in court.

He ordered that a police helicopter be deployed to Nakuru for air patrols from Friday, to work with the huge police deployment on the ground.

Michuki was accompanied by the Internal Security Permanent Secretary Cyrus Gitwai and Deputy Police Commissioner Lawrence Mwadime, who urged leaders to cooperate with police to find a lasting solution.

Earlier, Rift Valley Provincial Commissioner Hassan Noor Hassan accused the media of sensational reporting of the situation in the troubled district.

In Nairobi meanwhile, the faiths-based Ufungamano initiative condemned electoral violence, particularly that meted out on female candidates.

The lobby also said the government, Electoral Commission of Kenya and the Attorney General's office must take decisive action to end killings in Kuresoi, Mt Elgon and Bura.

Addressing a news conference in Nairobi, officials from seven member organizations also said that unless electoral malpractices such as bribery and vote buying were done away with, Kenyans would be unable to effectively participate in the December 27th poll.

A joint statement read: "This should not be allowed to continue. The government must act now to protect the lives and property of all people."

Churches together with the Hindu Council of Kenya also criticized the purported Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between ODM and a section of Muslim leaders, and said it was wrong to tie issues of religion and the State.

They said politicians should not favour one religious group over another.

"Kenyans are governed by the constitution equally and therefore there is no logical reason why a section of the community should sign an MOU with a presidential candidate," the statement continued.

Member institutions included the Anglican Church of Kenya, the Evangelical Alliance of Kenya, the Kenya Episcopal Conference - Justice and Peace Commission, National Council of Churches of Kenya, the Organization of Africa Institutes Churches and the Presbyterian Church of East Africa.

7/1/08 2:05 PM  
Blogger Muslims Against Sharia said...

Most of the Western Muslim establishment is comprised of Islamist groups claiming to be moderates. True moderate Muslims reject Islamic supremacy and Sharia; embrace religious equality and democracy.

What is a moderate Muslim? According to a dictionary, a moderate is a person who is opposed to radical or extreme views or measures, especially in politics or religion. Yet, majority of the public seem to be struggling with the definition of a moderate Muslim. Perhaps we can make this task easier by defining a radical Muslim and then defining the moderate as an opposite of the radical.

Muslims Against Sharia compiled a list of issues that differentiate moderate Muslims from Islamic radicals. Hopefully you can help us grow this list.
http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/ 2008/01/what-is-moderate-muslim.html

Poll: Who is a moderate Muslim?
http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/ 2008/01/poll-who-is-moderate-muslim.html

7/1/08 4:29 PM  
Blogger Elmer's Brother said...

you might find this interesting

7/1/08 5:25 PM  
Blogger Always On Watch said...

IBA has a few stories about Obama's Kenya connections.

8/1/08 5:27 AM  
Blogger Always On Watch said...

Oops! I see that EB has posted the exact link to one story at IBA.

8/1/08 5:27 AM  
Blogger Always On Watch said...

Duck,
You won't accept the threat of shari'a until its flag is imposing its regimen on you?

Pay more attention. Terrorism, including the silent kind, is off to a rousing start for 2008.

Bhutto's assassination may be the harbinger of the new surge of terrorists.

8/1/08 5:29 AM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

AOW, just how is sharia going to be a threat to me? I really want to know.

Once again, sharia is a threat to moderate Muslims and we should see about supporting them.

If you can find examples of sharia being imposed in America or even in Europe for that matter then let me know.

And also remember that when westerners use the term, they are using it to express their phobias and have as little understanding of it as I do of evangelicals.

8/1/08 7:09 AM  
Blogger nanc said...

plucky - the veil or hijab is but one of the first signs of sharia in a community - have you seen any women wearing them round about you?

but you don't have to worry about that as you're a guy. i think.

8/1/08 9:09 AM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

nanc, my next door neighbor wears a hijab. So what?

8/1/08 10:45 AM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

The Muslim's are revolting!

8/1/08 11:25 AM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

Nonsense. Some people who are muslim rioted in a country where damn near everyone is rioting.

Did they riot because they are Muslim?

For a Muslim cause?

or is Farmer ascribing causation to a descriptive variable?

8/1/08 11:55 AM  
Blogger Muslims Against Sharia said...

Ducky's Here,

"AOW, just how is sharia going to be a threat to me? I really want to know."

Have you lived in a cave for the last decade? Under Sharia you will have three choices: convert to Islam (a fundamentalist version), accept Dhimmitude (quasi-slavery) or die. If any of those choices appeal to you, than Sharia is not a threat.

"Once again, sharia is a threat to moderate Muslims and we should see about supporting them."

No, Sharia is a threat to everybody, not just to us. The good start to support moderate Muslims would be to stop supporting radical Muslims, which the West does both politically and financially.

"If you can find examples of sharia being imposed in America or even in Europe for that matter then let me know."
America: Aqsa Parvez and the Said sisters. Europe: no-go zones in Britain and France.

"when westerners use the term, they are using it to express their phobias and have as little understanding of it"

What a bunch of crap! Why don't you learn what Sharia is and stop projecting.

"Did they riot because they are Muslim?"

Absolutely. Radical imams are at the heart of those riots.

8/1/08 12:22 PM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

muslims against sharia ... now just how is that going to be imposed in South Boston? I really want to some Muslim come down to the Carmen's and tell the MBTA union guys they have to stop drinking.

Please, Muslims can't even get their shit together against Iran and they are going to take over Southie?

Bwahahahahahahaha !!!!

8/1/08 12:48 PM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

No Go zones? Most of Baltimore is a fucking no go zone. Does that mean that blacks are taking over the country?

Please, bore me later.

8/1/08 1:17 PM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

Asqa Parvez ... now as tragic as that is just how does an anecdotal event within a Muslim family translate to imposing sharia? Honor killings have nothing to do with sharia. That can be demonstrated by the presence of honor killings in many cultures and the inconsistent presence of honor killings within Muslim countries.

Now "Muslims against sharia", which is it:

1. You aren't Muslim (my bet: What's your freeper screen name?)

2. They don't teach basic reasoning at the madrassa

Which is it?

8/1/08 1:24 PM  
Blogger Muslims Against Sharia said...

“now just how is that going to be imposed in South Boston?”

It takes time. This is from “An Explanatory Memorandum On the General Strategic Goal for the Group (Muslim Brotherhood in North America)”: "Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America: The Process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brothers] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

Lebanon used to be a paradise before it was overtaken by radical Muslims.

“Muslims can't even get their shit together against Iran and they are going to take over Southie?”

You seem to be too dumb to realize that Iran has been Muslim country for over millennium. It used to be Zoroastrian before radical Muslims took it over.

“No Go zones? Most of Baltimore is a fucking no go zone. Does that mean that blacks are taking over the country?”

You don’t seem to understand the difference between a race and a political ideology.

“anecdotal event within a Muslim family”

Aqsa’s death could be described like that either by an Islamist or a complete moron, and judging by you vast expertise on radical Islam, you are not an Islamist.

“Honor killings have nothing to do with sharia.”

That must be the most idiotic statement I’ve heard in a while! You definitely deserve the seat at a dumbshit table

8/1/08 2:11 PM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

Yeah, the Likud filth had nothing to do with the problems in Lebanon. As far as your apologies for the Israeli Apartheid Regime, bore me later.

9/1/08 6:45 AM  
Blogger Muslims Against Sharia said...

Ducky's Here,

If you are just a cocksucking anti-Semite, why don't you come out and say it? Then nobody would waste your time on your demented rants.

9/1/08 9:01 AM  
Blogger Mr. Beamish the Kakistocrat said...

"If you are just a cocksucking anti-Semite, why don't you come out and say it?"

Ducky has never denied he's a traditional leftist.

9/1/08 9:38 AM  
Blogger Muslims Against Sharia said...

Mr. Beamish the Kakistocrat,

It is not fair to say that every leftist is an anti-Semite just as it is not fair to say that every Muslim is a terrorist. However the sad facts are that most anti-Semites are leftists and most terrorists are Muslim. Very disturbing.

9/1/08 10:16 AM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

...and they tell us not to stereotype. If the shoe fits...

9/1/08 10:59 AM  
Blogger Muslims Against Sharia said...

Farmer John,

Stereotyping places us in the same boat with bin Ladens; that's just wrong.

9/1/08 11:22 AM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

...then call me irresponsible. It's in my "nature". ;-)

Nietzsche, "Will to Power"

512 (1885)

Logic is bound to the condition: assume there are identical cases. In fact, to make possible logical thinking and inferences, this condition must first be treated fictitously as fulfilled. That is: the will to logical truth can be carried through only after a fundamental falsification of all events is assumed. From which it follows that a drive rules here that is capable of employing both means, firstly falsification, then the implementation of its own point of view: logic does not spring from will to truth.

9/1/08 11:32 AM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

"Gay Science"

Origin of the Logical. Where has logic originated in men's heads? Undoubtedly out of the illogical, the domain of which must originally have been immense. But numberless beings who reasoned otherwise than we do at present, perished; albeit that they may have come nearer to truth than we! Whoever, for example, could not discern the "like" often enough with regard to food, and with regard to animals dangerous to him, whoever, therefore, deduced too slowly, or was too circumspect in his deductions, had smaller probability of survival than he who in all similar cases immediately divined the equality. The preponderating inclination, however, to deal with the similar as the equal - an illogical inclination, for there is no thing equal in itself - first created the whole basis of logic. It was just so (in order that the conception of substance should originate, this being indispensable to logic, although in the strictest sense nothing actual corresponds to it) that for a long period the changing process in things had to be overlooked, and remain unperceived; the beings not seeing correctly had an advantage over those who saw everything "in flux." In itself every high degree of circumspection in conclusions, every skeptical inclination, is a great danger to life. No living being might have been preserved unless the contrary inclination - to affirm rather than suspend judgment, to mistake and fabricate rather than wait, to assent rather than deny, to decide rather than be in the right - had been cultivated with extra ordinary assiduity. The course of logical thought and reasoning in our modern brain corresponds to a process and struggle of impulses, which singly and in themselves are all very illogical and unjust; we experience usually only the result of the struggle so rapidly and secretly does this primitive mechanism now operate in us.

9/1/08 11:34 AM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

...and please, I know you want me draw a distinction between moderate Moslem's and Radical-Ismaicists, and I do. But truth is often the first victim of every war or struggle for power or survival.

I don't go around calling all Moslem's terrorists. But if they show up at an airport after 9/11, they should understand that it would make me feel MUCH more comfortable if they volunteered their luggage for an inspection. But they don't.

9/1/08 11:43 AM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

So, "Muslims against sharia" is exposed as a Likud sympathizer who can't get beyond labeling criticism of Israel as anti-semitism and we also hear from the "God as real estate agent" school in the voice of Beamish.

Carry on gentlemen but please MAS, there are leftists here, they live the life of the mind and they can spot a low level phony sych as yourself quickly,

9/1/08 11:47 AM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

btw - mr ducky is my Virgil. We take turns escorting each other through our respective ethereal domains... mostly for comedic purposes.

As you can see, he takes his job a little too seriously, sometimes. I think he's buckin' for Charon's job.

9/1/08 11:49 AM  
Blogger Muslims Against Sharia said...

Farmer John,

"But if they show up at an airport after 9/11, they should understand that it would make me feel MUCH more comfortable if they volunteered their luggage for an inspection. But they don't."

For what it's worth, I feel safer when TSA singles me out for a secondary inspection rather than an 80-year old woman. Fucky's Here is a degenerate demagogue, so there is no point explaining anything to that dumbshit.

9/1/08 12:50 PM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

Well, I think that even he would agree to the degenerate demagogue label. But dumbsh*t? You've got the wrong duck.

9/1/08 12:56 PM  
Blogger Muslims Against Sharia said...

Farmer John,

"degenerate demagogue" was a description. "dumbshit" was just an insult. But you have to admit that one cannot be too bright to espouse this type of nonsense.

9/1/08 1:06 PM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

Farmer, no way am I degenerate.

I'm actually kind of a family values type.

9/1/08 1:31 PM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

One need not be bright... but ducky is nothing if not brilliant when he wants to be.

...and I'm sorry if I spoke for you, mr. ducky. I know you hold many very respectable family values.

I place myself in the category of "degenerates" simply by virtue of our occupying a point on the back-side of the civilizational curve. Where we're no longer "forcing" culture, but instead "removing" force (beyond the minimum that would be required to keep a certain subset of permanent values in place). In that sense, I feel we are all "degenerates".

9/1/08 2:12 PM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

Mr ducky is crazy like a fox.

9/1/08 2:14 PM  
Blogger Farmer John said...

...and ducky's is representative of Nietzsche's Problem of Socrates.

9/1/08 2:17 PM  
Blogger Ducky's Here said...

I think I'll read that essay, Farmer.

Apparently Friedrich had some lucid days.

10/1/08 10:06 AM  
Blogger Mr. Beamish the Kakistocrat said...

It is not fair to say that every leftist is an anti-Semite

No, it is unfair to say that every anti-Semite is a leftist.

11/1/08 12:49 AM  
Blogger Mr. Beamish the Kakistocrat said...

,,,though you'd be hard pressed to find one that wasn't.

11/1/08 12:51 AM  
Blogger Mr. Beamish the Kakistocrat said...

Ducky,

You misplace me.

I'm of the "I can't tell the difference between Ducky and Hitler" school.

11/1/08 12:55 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home