Saturday, July 12, 2025

Thousand Brain Theory...

Late Wittgenstein, a  dissent...?  Phonetic overlays?  Olfactory overlays?  Many voters. Many maps.  Overlapping maps.   Every cortical column a "quanta"?  The rhizome. The brainwave oscillator column-query firing order.?

74 comments:

  1. Will be resolved... when we'll gain ability to perform full-scale experiments. And for that new techs with characteristics of mass production and flexibility needed.

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I used to have my own circuit theory... AND & OR gates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Reason for neocortical layers.... logic circuits.

      Delete
    2. ...with big ones being "motor" neurons.

      Delete
    3. Not able to hold such things in my mind anymore...

      when amount of gates overflowed billion.

      Delete
    4. That's why new approaches, new techs needed.

      Delete
    5. Am I was not colloquial enough? About "closed cycle of design, production and etc", "evolution based".

      Delete
    6. That's, up to developers...

      Delete
    7. Naaah. NO cookbook. Yawn.

      That's why it called NEW. Unseen. Untried.

      Delete
    8. Naaah.

      So far we learned how to use mechanical levers.

      As to ones in sphere of intellect -- we still can do what pharaohs did -- amass people to move that information boulder.

      And with it, we can build pyramids. But, only pyramids.

      Yawn.

      Delete
    9. Pharaoh had the advantage of being surrounded by a vast wasteland of uninhabitable terrain that trapped his people on the banks of the Nile and thereby subjected them to his powers. What do you have Sisyphus?

      Delete
    10. Waaah. I gave pharaohs as example of uneffectivity.

      Why I should follow their example.

      Delete
    11. Whole idea -- to became smarter. Than pharaohs. Than Merovingians. Than modern office plankton.

      Delete
    12. Maybe you could strap a few into your helmet, along with a NeuraLink and do some of that 'Matrix" kung-fu training!

      Delete
    13. Becoming stingy? )

      Why so? ;-)

      Delete
    14. I didn't think you wanted an F-16 pilot module...

      Delete
    15. We weren't talking about the new video? The what was "stingy?

      Delete
    16. Ah. I see. I misread your emotions. As usual.

      Delete
  3. Well.

    Here an article -- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/12/world/europe/ukraine-russia-kursk.html#commentsContainer

    Comments -- priceless.

    As well as covardly censuring out with closing comments, because they turned in unfortunate direction.

    Plague to BOTH of your houses -- and DEMNs, and REPS.

    And I think that is common attitude of people of the World, that still care to read it. That your political shit. In English.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm surprised they're still covering it. Everyone wants the war to just go away...

      Delete
    2. Yeah. I got it, already.

      Childish: "Pain-pain, go away".

      Delete
    3. Isn't that the Capitalist injunction... "Enjoy!"

      War without Pain. That's what they sell now. And our job is to consume, not suffer!

      Delete
    4. ...Products with all the harmful ingredients removed!

      Delete
    5. Ukraine is no longer selling a "painless" war to America. And to sell it, will require devising a new marketing strategy. One that would make whatever pain it undergoes in the process, worth it for them... and not the corporate oligarch's who currently stand to benefit.

      In America's Revolutionary War, Officers were promised 1,000 acres of land... and enlisted volunteers 500 acres. What does Ukraine offer average Americans but a 2x6x6 plot of rocky soil?

      Delete
    6. The mujahadeen were offered war brides and the prospect of becoming war lords in a new country. THAT was Osama bin Laden's role in marketing jihad to the 2nd+ sons of Islamic fathers. Bankrolling the "foreign" fighters to Afghanistan (v USSR).

      Delete
    7. You're going to need many more foreign fighters. You're running out of domestic cannon fodder.

      Delete
    8. ...and don't tell me it's that short disgusting actor in Kyiv.

      Delete
    9. America didn't get very many Lafayettes from France, but Franklin did convince Louis to send his Navy to France leading to victory at Yorktown. And when America entered WWI, the cry was "Lafayette, we are here!"

      Delete
    10. Thomas Paine & co offered little support to the Girondists in the French Revolution. But he did try (the Jacobins won).

      Delete
  4. //Ukraine is no longer selling a "painless" war to America

    Yeah. That product OUT of shelves.

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sounds like you need to work on a new product marketing plan then.

      Delete
    2. You, USA. YOU. ;-P

      Delete
    3. If that's your target market. I doubt many foreign mijahadeen will take anything less than 4 Russian wives though.

      Delete
    4. You, USA. You.

      Delete
    5. Give me 4 young-fertile Russian war brides and an annual $500k blank-check stipend for arms and ammunition and I'll run a 7-11 along the Russian border wherever you need me.

      Delete
    6. Go ask Pentagon. Or CIA. I... have no authority. To waste $.

      Delete
    7. See? There's nothing in the war for America but a bill.

      Delete
    8. Whatever... yawn.

      Wars... its Reality itself. Nobody can ignore.

      Or, as Sun Tzu colorfully stated.

      “The art of war is of vital importance to the State. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. Hence it is a subject of inquiry which can on no account be neglected.”
      ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War

      Delete
  5. // What does Ukraine offer average Americans but a 2x6x6 plot of rocky soil?

    //You're going to need many more foreign fighters. You're running out of domestic cannon fodder.

    That is your problem, USA.

    You still trying "Nobody home".

    But... what are stages of accepting uninevitable?

    PS BTW, did you read that article at NYT.

    Comments especially. ;-p
    https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/12/world/europe/ukraine-russia-kursk.html#commentsContainer

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You really think shame and guilt-pride are your best marketing strategy? There a lot of room inside the RICE motivation algorithm. The 'C' (Coercion) is usually not the best option. It only works once.

      Delete
    2. ...and I skimmed the article and didn't look at the comments that got shut down. I don't much enjoy Ukrainian pity parties about dead bodies that no one wants to clean up.

      Delete
    3. My?

      I, just a mere insignificant pupil of History...

      Delete

    4. Brent Berens
      B.C.
      July 12
      @cogito Accepting Russia's one sided terms to relinquish stolen land would only lead to a pause where Russia would replenish its armaments and manpower to relaunch the attack to take over Ukraine. Such a capitulation would only guarantee more extensive fighting. Ukraine needs arms, not Russian occupation.

      Delete

    5. Richard Levine
      Jacksonville, Florida
      July 12
      @cogito Russia will be satisfied. Facts speak louder than words. Russia has yet to directly attack a NATO country. Ironically, if Ukraine were in NATO they would have been safer, and if they were to join NATO they would be safer. Which is the real reason Russia oppose it. If the issue were NATO aggression Russia would be worried about attacks from Finland and Sweden, which they're not

      Delete

    6. Ted
      Englewook NJ
      July 12
      No, Russia's peace terms are much more extensive and amount to capitulation by Ukraine. Here's how Google's AI summarizes them:
      Key demands include the recognition of Crimea and the four annexed regions as Russian territory, Ukrainian demilitarization, and a permanent block on NATO membership. Additionally, Russia seeks to halt Western military aid to Ukraine and insists on the lifting of sanctions.

      Delete
    7. Maybe your khaki Napoleon should fly to DC for another 'constructive' dialogue with the blond jefe and pen a backup plan for 'after the collapse'.

      Delete
    8. ...cuz I doubt Lindsay Graham can back up any of his worthless promises.

      Delete
    9. Whatever.

      That's your war, USA, now.

      Delete
    10. Go kneel. ;-p Then.

      Delete
    11. Not before me. Before liliPut and liliXi.

      Delete
    12. liliPut and liliXi... do not look satisfied...

      Delete
    13. Maybe we should throw is Poland as the second step of appeasement.

      Delete
  6. Here.

    Face of Reality.

    https://images.cnscdn.com/d/9/4/7/d9476139eb19bc0d298e0b8f4a34bd3d/original.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah. If it already an empire. And do contain Siria.

      Yawn.

      Delete
    2. Yeah. That was another CIA lost cause. Half of Syria emigrated to europe.

      Delete
    3. That was foto of Jews bombing Siria.

      Yawn.

      Delete
    4. Overton's Window.

      Yawn.

      Delete
    5. Maybe we should throw is Poland as the second step of appeasement.

      Delete