"Intelligence is a fixed goal with variable means of achieving it"
"Our intelligence cannot wall itself up alive, like a pupa in a chrysalis. It must at any cost keep on speaking terms with the universe that engendered it"
Some notes on the above video:
Integral Theory -Ken Wilbur
Four inter-related dimensions of language:
1. Psychological realm - Internal realm of meaning making.
2. Embodied and Behavioural - Language describes how we feel, and how we can react.
3. Cultural Realm - Language is a vessel of culture that can transmit shared values, etc.
4. Social Communication infrastructure. Physical media infrastructure AND institutions and norms which govern communication. they determine who gets to speak, what gets to be said, who gets heard, and how messages travel. They influence the rhythm, reach and tone of public discourse.
Life seeks nourishment, stability, growth, adaptation, connection, repair, and when necessary, sacrifice (among other things).
Six features or characteristics about language"
1. Language is generative. You can recombine finite words and rules into infinite expressive combinations.
2. Displacement. We can communicate about things beyond local space and time (past, present or future).
3. Syntax and grammar. Language has complex rules that can build layered meanings.
4. Language is symbolic and abstract. It doesn't just convey reactions and locations. It refers to ideas, generalizations, and possibilities.
5. Recursiveness. We can use language to reflect upon language itself.
6. Evolution. Our languages adapt "culturally".
Sapir Whorf hypothesis. "The structure of a language determines a native speaker's perception and categorization of experience. It shapes our thoughts and understanding of reality." In weaker form, it nudges (not determines) our cognition, how individuals and cultures navigate reality.
The invention of written language didn't just expand communication, it also concentrated power. Those who could read and write gained access to knowledge, legal authority, religious interpretation, and record keeping, while the majority remained dependent upon on oral transmission. This creating a lasting divide between literacy empowered elites and the broader population creating hierarchies. The Gutenberg Press' Bible broke the Churches hold on Religious interpretation and lead to the Protestant Reformation. Masonic and Intelligence Community Secrecy serves to Concentrates Power in the hands of certain selected elites (Master Mason or a "siloed" government NSA or CIA Director 33rd degree).
Yawn. Solaristic? ;-p
ReplyDeleteCould be...
DeleteOr... scholastic. ;-p
DeleteTraditional mind-numbling babbling of "those who know better".
Inside the cave or out, what's the difference? You'll never see the "thing in itself". You'll only "feel the effects" of the events as they happen.
Delete...and later imagine what they "meant".
Delete//while the majority remained dependent upon on oral transmission. This creating a lasting divide between literacy empowered elites and the broader population creating hierarchies.
ReplyDeleteNaah. Hierarchies created NEED to protect own homes and families... with military might. Yawn.
You sound like one of Sun Tzu's army of concubines.
DeleteNever teach your slaves how to read!
DeleteKPCOFGS
DeleteTaxonomy.
DeleteNested for recursiveness.
Delete...in the Domain of language.
DeleteNaaah.
DeleteI just know Cybernetics.
Yawn.
Building communications bridges and work flows between machines and their interlocutors.
DeleteAnalog or Digital?
Hah.
DeleteIts interesting, that despite such a big (declared) difference between "systems".
USSR was fighting furiously against Cybernetics. AND USA tried hard to deminish and invert it.
Seems like "those who know better" really knows... what is dangerous to their rule. ;-p
Welcome to Aristophanes Cloud Cuckooland. Where "those who know better" now decide where all the smoke from the sacrifices goes.
Delete...and it's not to the birds who built it.
Delete//Yep.
ReplyDeleteBut what built on myths? If not traditional culture.
August 23, 2025 at 11:58 AM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
ALL culture. It's all about 'forgetting' the Noble Lies which create it (becoming essential and foundational to the very thought process language game it participates in).
Did I said... that there is some OTHER culture -- WHERE???)))
Institutional cultures and ethics. At ever level in a cultural taxonomy.
DeleteSides of same coin. Yawn.
DeleteNot sides, imaginary categories playing different language games.
Delete//You'll never see the "thing in itself".
ReplyDeleteYawn.
As a programmer I can see what Turing Machine doing. In and out. And all way through.
That's why I say it, but you always discount it, as same kind whataboutisms you using, my words -- "wisdoms of past tend to grow imprecise, and even outdated, with time".
Really. Neither Plato or Socrates have had a computer. Neither Nietzsche. Not even that Zizek.
So, HOW they could take into account implications from it existing and working????
That's why their notion... fore the very least -- incomplete. Imprecise.
And by the matter of fact -- outdated.
Such is the nature of language and knowledge itself. The minute an engineer graduates from college, his skills are outdated.
Delete“We look at the present through a rear view mirror. We march backwards into the future.”
― Marshall McLuhan
“Politics offers yesterday's answers to today's questions.”
― Marshall McLuhan, The Medium is the Massage
Philosophy today is a footnote to Plato.
Delete//Such is the nature of language and knowledge itself. The minute an engineer graduates from college, his skills are outdated.
ReplyDeleteBS. Yawn.
Especially today. When traditional culture make technologies stagnate.
Which create opportunity for barbarians.
...who can match them without the institutions which spread and creatively combine forms of knowledge...
DeleteWhy did Japan decide to "modernize" in the late 19th century? Why not just play more "Shogun and emperor" games (traditional culture)?
Because countries need to compete with the pendejo countries chasing mythical "progress" stupidly thinking that new tech is gonna fix everything.
Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others.
- Ambrose Bierce
The Greeks didn't stupidly running around inventing new weapons (except for Archimedes)... medes being "persian".
And whom do you know that from? ;-p
DeleteWhat about
The Antikythera Mechanism is the oldest known complex mechanical computer and orrery, an ancient Greek device made of bronze gears used to predict astronomical positions, solar and lunar eclipses, and the dates of the Panhellenic Games. Discovered in a shipwreck off the coast of Antikythera in 1900, it dates to the second century BCE and was the most advanced technological device of antiquity until the 14th century CE.
Hipparchus of Rhodes was an astronomer not a weapons developer like Archimedes. The guy invented trigonometry. I hated trig.
DeleteAnd it was likely built in a family workshop, not the Henry Ford Assembly Line. Unless you're a Russian casting tank turrents in sand-pits, you need mass production machines, and the operators to run them if you want to compete as a "modern".
The mechanism was a one-off. Anyone can create a one-off. But how about 10,000 (nearly useless) Norden bomb sights, let alone the bombers to put them on. Or better, an orbitting GPS constellation and 100,000 receivers for the guided missiles?
DeleteThat is what it takes to compete with "modernity".
Hello. We are in post-modern now...
DeleteAnd YOU -- USA... pulled out of misery and throwed into modern and post-modern all your enemies.
DeleteAnd now declaring full stop to evolve... which mean -- to decline. to pull you out of misery?))))
Yawn.
Wanna some commander Per Yi....
That's just it. The modern model (industrialization) has been pushed beyond its' useful limits.... as it has rendered 80% of humanity "redundant". It also has concentrated wealth in the hands of monopoly capital. It's become socially "fragile". We need to bridge the Producer-consumer divide (East produces, West consumes) into a more anti-fragile Prosumer economic model, where Commerce (Main Street) and not Capitalism (Wall Street) dominates.
DeleteThis means US hegemonic financial capital needs to pull back, and allow regional localities to begin to develop their own locally sustainable capabilities.
And your mirrors... they all just have Traditional Culture™ on em.
ReplyDeleteYou are vendor locked! :-))))
I refer you to the Ambrose Bierce quote above.
DeleteWhatever.
Delete"Wisdoms of the past tend to grow OUTDATED!"
And every run on Broadway predicted at Lindy's ends too. Plato's run hasn't ended. And Nietzsche's anti-Plato has been running for on near 150 years now... and STILL hasn't put Plato's philosophy off Broadway and returned language to the pre-Pauline intervention period.
DeleteAnd why it should?
DeleteIt's more honest and "manly", IMO. Why should everyone have to hide their ambitions?
DeleteIt also re-inverts the Master-Slave dialectic. People will "aspire" to mastery.
DeleteWhy it should stop?
DeleteOscillating in between meaningless BS.
Abrogate your power to be a master, be my guest. Rent yourself out for the safety and security of a fixed low salary, that's your right. Don't take "risks" and be the servant in the Biblical Parable of the 3 talents...
DeleteGoogle AI:
The Parable of the Talents (also known as the Parable of the Three Servants) is a story found in the Bible (Matthew 25:14-30), where a master gives varying amounts of "talents" (a large sum of money) to his three servants before going on a journey. Two servants invest their money and double it, receiving praise and reward upon the master's return, while the third servant, out of fear, buries his talent and earns no profit. He is then punished and his talent is taken away and given to the first servant, illustrating that those who use their gifts and resources well will receive more, while those who do nothing will lose what they have.
The Story in Detail
1. The Master Entrusts His Wealth:
A master gives property to his three servants, distributing five talents to one, two to another, and one to the last, according to their individual abilities.
2. The Servants' Actions:
The servant with five talents invests the money and doubles it, earning an additional five talents.
The servant with two talents also invests and doubles his share, earning two more talents.
The servant with one talent, out of fear, buries the money in the ground to keep it safe.
3. The Master's Return:
After a long time, the master returns to settle accounts with his servants.
4. The Rewards and Punishment:
The master commends the first two servants for their faithfulness and good stewardship, declaring, "You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much".
The third servant returns only the original talent, explaining that he was afraid. The master calls him "wicked and slothful" and takes his talent, giving it to the servant with the most talents.
The Meaning of the Parable
Stewardship:
The parable emphasizes the importance of being a good steward of the resources, abilities, and spiritual gifts God has given us.
God's Kingdom:
The story is presented as a lesson about the nature of God's kingdom, where those who use their gifts for his purposes will be rewarded with more.
Consequences of Inaction:
The third servant is condemned not for having only one talent, but for his idleness and fear, which prevented him from making any return on what he was given.
In essence, the parable teaches that we should actively use and invest the talents, skills, and resources we have received, rather than letting them remain unused.
The "Parable of the Talents", in Matthew 25:14–30...
Yap.
DeleteHumanity have talent -- to grow into space-ferring civilization.
But you, propose to put it to waste...
You want a gay navy in space? ;)
Delete//Not sides, imaginary categories playing different language games
ReplyDeleteYawn.
"Loaded" games. That predesigned for "those who know better" to stay in power.
Yes, judges in the legal system, entrepreneurs in the business sector, doctors in the medical sector... each playing its' own "language game" to keep their secret club membership hierarchies. They "know better" cuz THEY keep the secrets.
Delete...and play by the secret "unwritten rules" of the game.
DeleteRing-knockers.
BS.
DeleteYawn.
I've got a class ring. I simply choose not to knock it. Most of my classmates have left the Pentagon, but they can still make calls.
DeleteWhatever.
DeleteSocial networks aren't "whatever'. They're the engines of getting things done.
DeleteWhy do you think Internet "influencers" matter?
DeleteBS.
DeleteYep. That's what the world runs on.
DeleteMY line. Again.)))
Delete//Welcome to Aristophanes Cloud Cuckooland. Where "those who know better" now decide where all the smoke from the sacrifices goes.
ReplyDeleteWHAT A BIG NEWS!!!
Oh, sorry. No. Its all as it always was. In traditional culture. Yawn.
Whom do you think that "those who know better" are? From where and when did they appear???
Maybe they fell from the sky? As some fallen angels? Or E.T.s???)))
Naaah. "Those who know better", that is just regular parents.
Really. Do toddlers know anything? Isn't it dumb obvious that they perfectly know nothing.
But whom they take their knowledge from? If not from their immediate parents. Who "know it better"
For a need. As there's nobody else... to have any knowledge at all.
And WHOM they snatched that shiny "all-knowing"???
If not in the same manner -- their own parents.
That at first was same know nothing toddlers.
We aren't held as children forever. At some point we become "grown up" and are left alone to pursue out OWN follies, and not chase the follies of our parents (intra-galactic space travel). But hey, Don Quixote, there's another windmill. have at it!
DeleteHeh.
DeleteI just gave you precise and direct answer to your "and what about knowledge???".
And what you did?
Yeah. Immediatelly derailed it. Traditionally-Culturally way.
But.
Yawn.
...and I just showed you my "tradition's" limits to application of both knowledge and power.
DeleteMeden agan. In medias res.
Yeah. Artificial limits. Designed and suiting "those who know... better???? %)))))
DeleteYes, some people actually do. They can see and evaluate the effects on society that the myth of infinite progress instills.
DeleteCharacter is defined by one's "limits".
BS.
DeleteThere's only physical and cybernetical limits.
Yawn.
...and no such thing as "excess"! @@
Deletemeden agan!
Of course not.
DeleteThat is anthropocentric BS.
That stemming from painful feelings from overeating.
As opposed to drowning from drinking too much water...
Delete...or the pain of an overfull bladder.
Things need limits. Even Capitalism.
Moot point.
Delete...and this a moot court.
Delete//We aren't held as children forever.
ReplyDeleteOur bodies? Yes.(except for some rare mutations)
Our minds -- they are NEVER grown up.
And that IS that secret "those who know better", basicly same children, but more cunning, more smarty... but never wise.... basing their right to rule on.
And of course -- they FEAR true knowledge. And do spreading propaganda that NO such thing possible.
When a mind comes of age it becomes legally responsible to and for itself. Declare me non compos mentis otherwise.
DeleteWhen "those who know better" do so, and then try and keep THAT a secret from me... USAID/NED... then its' time for the kids to start kicking their parents in the balls.
Rochambeau time.
That same BS.
Delete"You passed through bar mitzvah... so, now you grown up"©
...and the parents must stop coddling their children, out of their love for them. prepare them for survival "on their own". It takes a village to raise a child (as Clinton would say). It takes a father to tell his wife to let them go.
DeleteSaaah... traditional. :-))))
DeleteCustom is king, and the law a tyrant.
DeleteWhatever.
Delete//each playing its' own "language game" to keep their secret club membership hierarchies.
ReplyDeleteAnd what secret do keep you?
Something about intrinsics of steam engines?%))))))
Sorry to say, but such "secrets" not interesting to anybody. Even to such a curiousfellow as I am yawn.
Yes, my profession was dead long before I even enrolled. But I did learn one thing about steam that I found very useful. The concept of enthalpy. The latent heat of vapourization.
DeleteIt's like "surplus jouissance". Or any "surplus" that you get when adding 1+1.
Dunno how they explained it to you.
DeleteBut I know that most silly explanations memorised the best.
Yawn.
You can't push with a rope. (I know, you hate that one).
DeletePft! Misconception. Yawn.
DeleteWell.
//The concept of enthalpy.
Did they explain to you that it is sum of Ideal Gas... and nitty-gritty details (aks inner energy) of Real Gases? ;-)
Because it seems that you groked only that part that about ideal things. ;-p
Nope. I had to apply the h in steam tables.
DeleteWhich means that answer is "no".
DeleteWater is an ideal thing? Unlike other elements? Impure ones in which the chemistries are mixed. @@
Delete...and measurements therefore impossible.
DeleteShould I sprinkle in some salt for you? There isn't enough corrosion in my boilers water and steam drums...
DeleteWhy did I waste all that money on boiler chemicals/
//Water is an ideal thing? Unlike other elements?
DeleteTotally my line.
Sea-water?
Delete//ALL culture. It's all about 'forgetting' the Noble Lies which create it (becoming essential and foundational to the very thought process language game it participates in).
ReplyDeleteThere's no secrets, nothing new or mystic about it.
I already have mention it here.
The "Monkeys and Cold Shower" or "Five Monkeys Experiment" is a widely shared but fictional story that serves as an allegory for how traditions and conformity become entrenched in groups, even after the original reason for a rule disappears. In the story, a group of monkeys learns to punish any member who tries to reach for a banana, even though the original monkeys were sprayed with cold water as punishment, not the new ones. While the experiment is often cited in business and social commentary, no scientific record of such an experiment actually occurring exists.
See?
Just a Cybernetics -- information naturally lost.
But, do you see how AI helping to spread "those who know better" propaganda, here?
By stating "there was no such thing")))))
Indeed. Like "antifa". or the invisible knights of the KKK.
DeleteInformation lost... or hidden. The AI "work flows" between LLMs that construct and attribute "agency". Or a programmers compilers.
It lost all of the time.
DeleteJust by design
Yes, the "vanishing mediator".
DeleteIn post-modernity... capitalism replaced democracy and brought the return of the feudalism (techno-feudalism) of monopoly capital.
Naaah. I pointed to more fundamental force -- entropy.
DeleteLife is the temporarily reversal of entropy.
DeleteBS.
DeleteLife it's SPEEDING UP Entropy.
...by locally reversing it.
DeleteBS.
DeleteThat "reversing" takes MORE of BETTER quality energy.
Like plants -- taking high quality and high energy solar radiation... and turning it into carbon fibers.
Then cows -- taking that carbon fiber... LOTS of it, and turn it into own meat.
Then you -- taking that high grade meat... and turning it into shit.
High quality one, I presume. But still edible only by some dirty worms and bacterias.
...and all that digestion creating living cells organized into higher and higher "assemblies" like organs and bodies.
DeleteHigher?
DeleteYawn.
Let's assume it true... for now.
But what about amount.
Or you will be saying that steam engine have great efficiency quotent? %))))
I'm saying that it can harness nuclear energy and exchange/ convert it into mechanical energy.... like money can convert bio-work into other forms of work-products.
DeleteYap.
DeleteIncluding EVEN nukelar... into endless list of produced wastes.
Something... mere bacteria would not be able to accomplish.))))
//Why did Japan decide to "modernize" in the late 19th century? Why not just play more "Shogun and emperor" games (traditional culture)?
ReplyDeleteAsk your commander Perry. Yawn.
Why you asking me in the first place, at all?
As an example. Japan learned the lesson early, and so wasn't torn apart like China. They were "early adapters" to modernism. China didn't fully adapt until Nixon and Kissinger went there in the 70s. They were still playing Mao's "Cultural Revolution" games and starving millions.
Delete:P
DeleteYeah...
Delete//Because countries need to compete with the pendejo countries chasing mythical "progress" stupidly thinking that new tech is gonna fix everything.
ReplyDeleteThat's for you. Pal from advanced civilization it about "fix everything".
While for em -- it's about being stuffed instead of hungry, rich instead of poor, powerful instead of weak.
And your such talks... it's just "those who know better" talks.
Of course -- you do not like to have em as concurents.
SAME.... as any "grown up" on this Earth, in ANY time... do not like to see as children grow, became stronger, self-interested... and stop listening "wise words of old and wise"...
That is NATURAL.
I'm done evolving and adapting to somebody else's music. And my music is classical! ;)
DeleteYou do, they -- not.
DeleteThey'll evolve, you'll extinct.
Yawn.
No, there's always an opposing force (virtue). The Chinese don't need "democracy" so long as they have America (or Europe) as the market for their production surpluses. Once that goes away, they'll need other markets for their mercantilism. Their people aren't "wealthy" enough to but the products their selling.
DeleteYou think they are mercantilists? Yawn.
DeleteWhy else would Trump bring back tariffs?
DeleteBecause he is Pound Stupid... grand-grand-son??? :-)))))
DeleteHey, $4 stupid trillion so far...
DeleteYap. Soup made of gold laying gouse... YAMMY!
DeleteYawn.
Pure profit.
DeleteYap.
DeleteFor a stupid hunter.
For access by the economically stupid to a market of people with surplus money to spend(something lacking in their own nations).
Delete//That's just it. The modern model (industrialization) has been pushed beyond its' useful limits....
ReplyDeleteHah. And who defined that limits??? %))))
Well, there was such a notion Peak Oil... but Reality laughing to its face.
It seems it the same with all other such limits -- that just revealing borders of homo-not-very-sapiens stooooopidity.
Each time.
Who? The markets. You haven't heard of the vanishing American Middle Class? THEY are the PRIMARY world market.
DeleteLimits... on "energy density" = limits on "Progress"
And yes, they can be stupidly defined and imposed. It's a question of the situation at the time. Resources available 9as in evolution and assembly theory. What's around and how can I use it "intelligently"
"Intelligence is a fixed goal with variable means of achieving it" - William James
Yep.
DeleteBecause you do not want to adopt NEW tech.
That would turn table back to Avarage Joe.
It pays more? Who knew?
DeleteSo... you want better work and life? Or just more money... for nothing?
DeleteThen, what is difference between you and Marxist?
Or his step-brother Nazi?
Yawn.
PS I do not want to ostracise you, with using such words. Just help you to (de)find your political stance. ;-p
Ownership control over my own means of production.
Deleteaka - Self-sufficiency.
You... unable to control your mind. Protect oneself from consuming all kinds of BS mis-dis-and-false-information.
DeleteAnd your mind is first and foremost "means of production".
Ya-a-a-awn.
Like building a gay space navy...
Delete//as it has rendered 80% of humanity "redundant".
ReplyDeleteEasy-peasy... just stop listening stupid (or, one who have stakes in that game) people who saying such silly stuff.
Yawn.
You've never heard of competition and the economies of scale? Scale is always on the side of monopoly capital.... it's what makes them into a monopoly.
DeleteHow it relates to "rendered redundant"???
Deleteredundant - unnecessary - unemployable - duplicates not needed.
DeleteIf small business A buys its raw materials for $5 a pound and big business B gets them for $4 a pound (economy of scale purchasing power),... and labour costs/times are equal, how long can A afford to stay in business if B cuts its' products unit sales price by $0.50 and A must match it to keep its' market share?
As consumers too??? %))))))
DeleteExactly. How many products can a minimum wage salary slave afford to buy? Pro-sumers.
DeleteYap.
DeleteThat's why you need to rise em into Middle Class.
That poor buggers... in China and India. ;-p
China's all about big, not small. India, on the other hand, has potential.
DeleteYou too much on the hook of DEMN propaganda.
ReplyDeleteNope. I'm in the middle of it. Between propagandas.
DeleteWhatever.
DeleteThat anyway falls in between lines of your antipode's quirks
They're TOTALLY irrational? Or maybe just have incommensurable values aimed at achieving "different" ideas of the Good"?
DeleteTechnology... it is not about Good and Bad.
DeleteAbout what Possible. And what not.
Yawn.
And you sit atop the "possible" antipode.
DeleteGay Space Navy....POSSIBLE!!!!!!!!!
DeleteSell that to rock collectors and gemologists. I don't need any rocks.
Delete// It also has concentrated wealth in the hands of monopoly capital. It's become socially "fragile". We need to bridge the Producer-consumer divide (East produces, West consumes) into a more anti-fragile Prosumer economic model, where Commerce (Main Street) and not Capitalism (Wall Street) dominates.
ReplyDeleteAnarchist?
Syndicalist?
Yawn.
Anarcho capitalist. ;)
DeleteNo, I'm a RADICAL PROGRESSIVE!!!!!
A proponent of SMALL (not large) Businesses and the private OWNERSHIP of them (to reduce the "scale" advantages)
...and an opponent of so-called "aggregate efficiencies". I want to bring back an "ownership" (not rentier techno-feudal) society.
DeleteYep. Then NEW tech that would allow people to build free life in ocean -- is your best choice. ;-)
DeleteWaterworld. Kevin Kostner.
DeleteAnti-utopia.
DeleteYawn.
Jar Jar Binks (Star wars). Your gay space navy could have shore-leave there.
DeleteYet more scifi.
DeleteYawn.
Isn't that your thing?
DeleteEurope came through it... long ago.
ReplyDeleteAnd you just outdated one. From periphery. ;-p
Yes, we inherited the British Empire and have f*cked it all up. We need to ressusitate American Colonialism post Revolution, when we had a more anti-fragile commercial economy and a trade policy that balanced Northern industrial and Southern agricultural interests.
DeleteThat... even more outdated. Like from 19th century.
Deleteyawn
Cyclical phases... escape from mercantilism. escape from feudalism.
DeleteYap.
Delete"Cyclical history". It even PRE 19th century.
Ancient. If not primordial.
Superstition.
Linear progress... the modern superstition that ends in a nuclear furnace.
DeleteYap. Traditional culture way thinking can come up only to such bad ideas...
DeleteNot all trad cultures. Most struggle to keep their grip on power.
Delete//This means US hegemonic financial capital needs to pull back, and allow regional localities to begin to develop their own locally sustainable capabilities.
ReplyDeleteAnd NEW tech can facilitate it just O.K.
Like for example -- with opening oceans for freedom of living and transferring.
Or Space.
Tech is great, but most times its a symptom of excess capital and therefore detrimental to human "commerce".
DeleteWell...
DeleteOpposed virtues. Yep. Now choose.
DeleteThis World not perfect in the first place.
DeleteWho said it could? Not that pyramid on back of the Dollar bill...
DeleteFrom start of BigBang.
DeleteDunno how dollar sign relates to it... apart from being late *CONSEQUENCE*...
Exchange value. I'll raise you two photons for an electron.
DeleteFor pulling such trick... you'll need a tech.
DeleteBut... you just babbling it mindlessly.
Yawn.
...and you're stuck on a single solution for every problem. Talk about a RAGING commodity fetish. @@
DeleteNot single solution. One single WORKING method of coming up with solutions to problems.
DeleteYawn.
Same as there is ONLY ONE way to count things --- use numbers.
Monkeys count with numbers?
DeleteCounting without numbers can be done through subitizing (instantly recognizing small quantities), one-to-one correspondence (using a separate object for each item, like pebbles for coconuts), or approximate terms (like "a few" or "a lot"). Some cultures have limited number words, relying on these methods for quantity.
Numbers are simply symbols. Not all brains operate symbolically like ours. So why do we call non-Arabic numbers, numerals (ie Roman Numerals)?
Intelligence finds a way.
But I know, I know.
ReplyDeleteYou just talk about freedom. But just want people to became slaves. Limit em to only agricultural work. Make em all amishes? %)))
Well, that too... only NEW tech can make.
I love the Amish. They have real "character".
Delete...by CHOICE!
DeleteWhatever.
DeleteBut... China and Rusha would apploud to that -- such an easy target for their invasion.
Yawn.
You HAVE read Aldous Huxley's "Island"!
DeleteNot fond of anti-utopias...
DeleteNo, it illustrates why there will never be one. Neighbors.
DeleteWhatever.
Deletemuh... Russia.
Delete???
DeleteUkraine... a utopia, but for Russia.... @@
DeleteWell... all I can come up to here... you still know some scifi. ;-p
Delete;-p
ReplyDelete$4 trillion... laugh while you can monkey boys!
DeleteYap.
DeleteBIG GOUSE!!!
Plato, "The Laws"... the economics of 'Magnesia'. Not worth invading.
DeleteAfter that gouse eaten and only bones remains?
DeleteBut bones... have a lot of calcium.
And hienas -- love bones, able to digest even em.
PS Anyway... grave worms -- are on the top of ANY food chain.
Yawn.
I hear that there's still lots a bat guano to mine. You should try inventing a tech for that.
Delete...and prove just how bat sh*t crazy you are.
Delete:-))))))
DeleteNo more comments here(((
ReplyDeleteLoad more... Load more... Load more glitch.
Delete