“They saw their injured country's woe;
The flaming town, the wasted field;
Then rushed to meet the insulting foe;
They took the spear, - but left the shield.”
―Philip Freneau
Tuesday, November 25, 2025
'Science' and the New Secular Religions of Progress: Hope Springs Internal?
People would need something to eat, something to drink, shelter... and most of all, some cheap and freely accessible entertainments.
So, you can continue screaming and kicking as much as you want -- you will not find among em too many simpatants of stopping or staggering Progress(which staggering by itself, and that is THE REASON of our current problems, not that it TOO FAST)... especially among OTHERS, like Chinese... or Africans... or Russians.
And... even if you'd find simpatants of suicidal "little death"... they, will eliminate themself. And will leave behind only that, that will be bent on continuing.
Yawn.
That's how Evolution works. And you DO NOT want to study Technology... tha ONLY can give you such power -- to ride, or even to subvert Evolution.
I have nothing against technology. I object to bureaucratically "sharing" it. Take the Free-masons. They became powerful by keeping their technological know-how secret. Trade secrets.
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew 1) Hierarchy 2) Shame 3) Scarcity
All lacking? in Evolutionary processes, but very present in Human Power/Control structures. Or are humans merely mimicking cell biologies with a different Step 2...?
Yaaaawn. That's because you know too few about Evolution. And do not want to study.
No? That IS evolution. Step 1, collect assembly materials. Step 2, assemble the right combination. Step 3, enjoy the resulting functionality.
The only difference is that it assembles EVERY combination and uses natural selection (and many, many generations if useful) to determine which ones were useful and contributed to the organism's survival.
Means... stop selling goods? Especially virtual "goods" that gives most profit? And stop recieving foreign goods, especially most sweet and pleasant?
I think, if YOU'D be able to accomplish... your own Ams woulld come to you, with forks and torches))))
And ONLY TECH could protect you from it. Make you big green and sturdy. ;-P As well as ONLY TECH could give you such powers (Wakanda became that... because they have tech, remember?)
Yes, stop selling "goods". Keep all the "goods" for ourselves.
Yes, the globalists are coming with pitchforks and torches for Trump and MAGA. That's because they built their factories in Asia where the labour costs were cheap, and now their products are subject to tariffs...
//“When we are unable to find tranquility within ourselves, it is useless to seek it elsewhere.” ― François de La Rochefoucauld PPS And... to our discussion here.
//Yes, it's a shame that all the programmers will soon be replaced by AI Agents.
Yawn. Who will be ruled over by that same programmers.
Oh, wait. They'll be given other name. Not programmers. And that will mean that that'll be somebody else. Because name "programmers" and people called programmers... that is one and the same things. In itself.%-))))
Yaaaaawn.
See... packer's behavior. They do not like when things they place in their boxes... do not fit-in, torn that boxes apart, gone missing, start crawling off that boxes.)))))
What a rebellious uprisal ))))) against "only right way"... of packing. ;-p
Yap. If you know how it works. If you *KNOW* the technology of it. You can devise a plan of what to do with it.
Otherwise... you can only burn incense with hope "gods" will like their smell and fulfill your wishes.))))))) November 25, 2025 at 2:26 AM -FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew If you "know" the requirements for a technology and can "specify" at least one component, others can go from there, especially if that component is the "interface"... aka (a microtubule piercing the cell membrane that serves a specific function - fuel, cooling, bio-electric information...).
Already did. Already people doing it.
Like I saw in news, drones developer started to test their designs inside simulation. As more cheap method.
Or... already mentioned here Bezos, started new busines of AI helping with engineering.
See? Progress is unstoppable.
And you have NO strength. NO techs... to prevent it from happening. ;-P
//To prevent a ridiculous speculative bubble from forming, and then collapsing in a spectacular fashion, like Dutch East India Co. "Tulip" futures. Remember the dot.com bubble?
""Packers always pretend that the map is the territory, play some silly word games, and then claim that they own integers and so on.""
;-P November 25, 2025 at 1:32 PM -FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew ??? November 25, 2025 at 4:23 PM Your reaction to my claim that "words are just labels", shadows of a thing, not things itself. November 26, 2025 at 12:43 AM Your arguments to authorities too. Like nitsche or kant too.
I have THREE distinct stone cold reasons to NOT "believe in words":
FIRST. As foreigner, even though I use your lang (and latters), they are meaningless to me.
SECOND. As programmer, I used to call things arbitrarily. That is called "identifers". And choice of it absolutely up to aesthetics and common sense of a programmer.
THIRD. As engineer. I know that words are meaningless. There is no "sturdy metal", only number of its strenght checked... by Brunel or by Rockwell ;-)
Words mean nothing. It's the relations between words that mean everything. "The cat is on the mat" The "structure". And then one must analyse the power hierarchies within that structure to understand the "environment" in which the structure is organized. (Discourse analysis). Lacanian formula.
Structuralism: Structuralism is a theoretical approach that interprets human culture, thought, and behavior by examining the underlying structures and patterns that give them meaning. It views phenomena as parts of larger systems, much like how words get their meaning from their relationship to other words in a language. Key applications of structuralism include analyzing language, social structures in anthropology, and narrative patterns in literature.
Post-Structuralism: Post-structuralism is a philosophical and literary movement that emerged in the late 20th century, critiquing structuralism by arguing that meaning is not fixed or stable but is fluid, complex, and shaped by power structures and the reader's context. Key figures like Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault are associated with this movement, which emphasizes the instability of language, the deconstruction of binary oppositions, and the idea that subjectivity is constructed through discourse. It also questions universal truths and highlights how power operates to shape knowledge and social reality.
Man is no longer Man. He is post-human. His technologies are the "materials" he manipulates (Step 2). Man is Cyborg, his information is stored outside of his body (in books/ computers). Man needs technologies to continue to evolve. He can evolve "chaotically" (ala Planaria) or "orderly" (ala Newt). The problem is in the algorithm he selects to use, and that "algorithm" is adaptable thru the collective culture.
Yes media... the "tech" leads, and a culture develops from it. Sometimes its' a good thing that develops. Sometimes its' not. Knowing all in advance? impossible. It takes a new tech to cure (thru time and natural selection) a bad one. What's good for China may not be "good" for the US (and visa versa). Why put all the tech eggs in one basket (Open Society)? Let every country develop their own (US and Tik Tok). The US IC doesn't need any foreign exploits being introduced. And we (US IC) no longer should seek to control every foreign government (capability building- USAID) in an "Open Society" exploit environment.
//...because there is no rationality to connect them other than to discern the different/ distinct goods of both being sought in each, and noting their difference (Difference and Repetition).
Key word here are "discern".
How???? November 25, 2025 at 12:14 PM -FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew social relation between Master:Hysteric::University:Analyst
//The only difference is that it assembles EVERY combination and uses natural selection (and many, many generations if useful) to determine which ones were useful and contributed to the organism's survival.
My childhood friend used to market this. He used to stop by when he was attending conventions in DC. He have me a bag that is used to store the helmet. It's my "go" bag now.
//That's because they built their factories in Asia where the labour costs were cheap, and now their products are subject to tariffs... November 26, 2025 at 9:28 AM
Yep. And USA receives sweet-sweet profits from it. And your stocks going up, up and UP.
BUT, you do not want profits... only worn underpants.:-))))
Sure, I love your comments, they make me think and develop the means of outwardly expressing my intuition.
And yes, I believe in Meta-narratives. Every "culture" is like a bio-electric pattern. I don't favour a single pattern (Narrative). I favour adaptability of patterns, of learning how to transform one into another (to meet new/ different environmental challenges).
Like in Russia-Ukraine War. Ukraine is like a cancer that refuses to communicate with the cells next to it. Trump is therefore shutting down other bio-electric ion channels and forcing it into re-establishing Russian communication.
""People suffering from M0 really aren’t very good at appreciating feedback effects. They can only think one step ahead. Tramlines that can be policed can kind of hold societies of M0 people together, but have no inherent value beyond this, since the universe cannot in fact be understood procedurally. Moreover, people suffering from M0 can always do the unspeakable, and then deny it. The need for self-honesty so that their maps can be maintained accurately isn’t there, since they have no maps to maintain."" November 25, 2025 at 1:29 PM -FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew What is MO? Modus Operandi?
//they make me think and develop the means of outwardly expressing my intuition.
That is the truth you still not know. ;-)
Mind. Staying alone. Freakingly UNABLE to produce. (why you think that Iluvatar created his ainurs? why such idea, came into mind of autor -- Tolkien? why god(s) created man? why we ourself so bent on creation (but, men only;-))
Nope. You'll need every penny to live in Silicon Valley. My parents home was bought for $17k. It's now worth $1.4m. The interest on a $1.4m home will cost you more than they can pay you. That's why I live in MD.
You are just like your moronic DEMN pre-censure here... that not allowed to post me comment above. Mentioning "that one whose name not allowed to mentIon" Yawn.
Whom RFia. can nuke up freely??? Without pollution flying back into their heartland? Whose men and women they need, to keep being Slavic and Orthodox? Whom they want just to relocate and not exterminate? WHO, intertwined through inter-marriages and blood relations???
Of course, that is Russians... and Americans. Yap. That's it. That is the Truth.
And that is Ukraine... they want to destroy with nukelar tsunamis in the ocean. And build thousand miles flying nukes.
Well... it's damn interesting in itself. As for mapper... it's very natural to look beyond horizont (like Columbus -- percieve India beyond that Ocean.
But how it works with packer???
Some scary-scary thing? Like thing withoud box? Or box that cannot be populated? ;-p
Swear words aren't conscious. They bypass all Oedipal classifications and organizations. They're like purloined letters. They always arrive at their destination.
The phrase qui pro quo, or quiproquo (from medieval Latin: literally qui instead of quo), is common in languages such as Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and French, where it means a misunderstanding.
Naaah. Have you experience learning foreign language? Getting knowing other culture?
+4 "Swearing in" can mean several things in Swahili, including to "take an oath" (apa kiapo or kula yamini) or to "administer an oath" (apisha), as well as to curse or use profanity (tukana or apiza). The specific term depends on the context. To take an oath Apa kiapo / Kula kiapo: To take an oath. Apa yamini / Kula yamini: To swear an oath, often for a specific purpose like on a religious text. Apa kabisa: To swear to something with conviction or to vow to do something. To administer an oath Apisha: To make someone swear an oath or to swear someone into office. To curse or use profanity Tukana / Apiza: To curse or swear at someone. Laana: The word for "curse". Tusi: A swear word or insult. Uchafu: Profanity. Mshenzi: A common insult meaning "fool" or "idiot". Pumbavu: Another insult, similar to "idiot".
So, would you care being called... Tusi? Or Mshenzi? ;-p
Google AI: Context is of paramount importance to understanding Finnegans Wake because it is constantly being fractured, reshaped, and reinvented through a multilingual, dreamlike style that relies on wordplay, puns, and associations. Instead of a fixed historical or authorial context, the book's meaning is generated through its own linguistic and narrative systems, requiring readers to construct context by tracing patterns, allusions, and linguistic roots from a vast network of languages and historical references. The importance is not in a single, unifying context, but in the process of grappling with countless shifting contexts created by the text itself, making the reader an active participant in its meaning-making.
I appreciate a good double entendre... it allows escapes from nitty-gritty contexts... new lines of flight to deterritorialize/ re-territorialize meanings.
The expression "writing between the lines" indicates the subject of this article. For the influence of persecution on literature is precisely that it compels all writers who hold heterodox views to develop a peculiar technique of writing, the technique which we have in mind when speaking of writing between the lines.This expression is clearly metaphoric. Any attempt to express its meaning in unmetaphoric language would lead to the discovery of a terra incognita, a field whose very dimensions are as yet unexplored and which offers ample scope for highly intriguing and even important investigations.
“We can express our feelings regarding the world around us either by poetic or by descriptive means... I prefer to express myself metaphorically. Let me stress: metaphorically, not symbolically. A symbol contains within itself a definite meaning, certain intellectual formula, while metaphor is an image. An image possessing the same distinguishing features as the world it represents. An image — as opposed to a symbol — is indefinite in meaning. One cannot speak of the infinite world by applying tools that are definite and finite. We can analyse the formula that constitutes a symbol, while metaphor is a being-within-itself, it’s a monomial. It falls apart at any attempt of touching it."
Where, if one NOT metaphorical enough... one can swiftly gone... to discover secrets of Siberia. And that is not that pleasant orientalistic things you so like to imagine. But extreme cold, hunger and inevitable death from nasty desires... I mean, deseases. ;-p
Like. How do you read this -- "Freiheit". Doesn't it looks like Free Hate? ;-p November 28, 2025 at 3:33 AM -FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew Yep... great line of flight, from liberty to hate.
In Latin, "ius" primarily means right, law, or justice. It can also function as a grammatical suffix, such as the ending -ius, used to form adjectives or Latinize surnames. The specific meaning of ius depends heavily on its context within a sentence.
Meanings of ius
Law: Refers to the body of rules that govern society.
Right: Indicates a legal or moral entitlement a person has.
Justice: Denotes the concept of fairness and the place where one goes to seek justice.
Legal Bond: Can refer to a legally binding agreement or a form of legal claim.
The suffix -ius
Adjective formation: Used to form adjectives that indicate "belonging to" or "made of" a noun, such as rēgius (kingly, from rēx "king").
Latinization of surnames: Added to surnames, especially in New Latin, to create a Latinized version, for example, "Descartes" becomes "Cartesius".
Examples in context
Ius gentium: "Law of nations" or international law.
Ius civile: "Civil law," the law that applied only to Roman citizens.
Summum ius: "The highest law" or "the letter of the law
And my answer as always: Whatever. Yawn.
ReplyDeletePeople would need something to eat, something to drink, shelter... and most of all, some cheap and freely accessible entertainments.
So, you can continue screaming and kicking as much as you want -- you will not find among em too many simpatants of stopping or staggering Progress(which staggering by itself, and that is THE REASON of our current problems, not that it TOO FAST)... especially among OTHERS, like Chinese... or Africans... or Russians.
And... even if you'd find simpatants of suicidal "little death"... they, will eliminate themself. And will leave behind only that, that will be bent on continuing.
Yawn.
That's how Evolution works. And you DO NOT want to study Technology... tha ONLY can give you such power -- to ride, or even to subvert Evolution.
I have nothing against technology. I object to bureaucratically "sharing" it. Take the Free-masons. They became powerful by keeping their technological know-how secret. Trade secrets.
DeleteYou can do it only through power of tech, that too.
DeleteJust keep it all within the borders.
DeleteIMPOSSIBLE. With modern techs.
DeleteThey will NOT WORK without Global Market.
You're mistaken. America has all the materials it needs. It just needs to exploit them (no more green environmentalist bs).
DeleteYawn... with New Tech? ;-p
DeleteOf course.
Delete...but with closed source code.
DeleteSo naive...)))
DeleteNot anymore.
DeleteYep... MY working. ;-p
Delete@@
Delete;-p
DeletePracticing "fake it till you make it", your favourite Ams game.)))
Since the world runs on bs, fake it til you make it is a pretty good strategy.
DeleteI gotcha.
DeleteBut, it need not to make me happy, I hope?
Whatever floats your boat. It's not my jouissance being compromised (Lacan).
Delete-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
ReplyDelete1) Hierarchy
2) Shame
3) Scarcity
All lacking? in Evolutionary processes, but very present in Human Power/Control structures. Or are humans merely mimicking cell biologies with a different Step 2...?
Yaaaawn.
That's because you know too few about Evolution. And do not want to study.
No? That IS evolution. Step 1, collect assembly materials. Step 2, assemble the right combination. Step 3, enjoy the resulting functionality.
DeleteThe only difference is that it assembles EVERY combination and uses natural selection (and many, many generations if useful) to determine which ones were useful and contributed to the organism's survival.
Time is evolutions "technologist".
DeleteLooks plausible.
Delete//Nope. Stop sharing info and tech.
ReplyDeleteMeans... stop selling goods? Especially virtual "goods" that gives most profit? And stop recieving foreign goods, especially most sweet and pleasant?
I think, if YOU'D be able to accomplish... your own Ams woulld come to you, with forks and torches))))
And ONLY TECH could protect you from it. Make you big green and sturdy. ;-P
As well as ONLY TECH could give you such powers (Wakanda became that... because they have tech, remember?)
Yes, stop selling "goods". Keep all the "goods" for ourselves.
DeleteYes, the globalists are coming with pitchforks and torches for Trump and MAGA. That's because they built their factories in Asia where the labour costs were cheap, and now their products are subject to tariffs...
Wakanda didn't share their tech, did they?
DeleteThey kept it SECRET.
Delete/Anonymous
ReplyDeleteYep.
You are packer.
Right away you trying to place us in boxes. "Cyborgs". "Gray Goo". "Whatever".
Mappers don't map?
???
That exactly a try to "map the territory".
And from what starting every map creation? Right, from describing some distinct orienteers.
Then, you draw their situation to each other.
Then, adding details of what in-between.
Ah... Step 2... then PROFIT (Step 3) lol!!
Delete//“When we are unable to find tranquility within ourselves, it is useless to seek it elsewhere.”
ReplyDelete― François de La Rochefoucauld
PPS And... to our discussion here.
\-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
:0
/Anonymous
???
Generation from Opposites... not tranquility.
Whatever.
It keeps you agitated. And not tranquil.
Yawn.
Yes... "anxious"... a hijacked emotion. ;)
Delete//Yes, it's a shame that all the programmers will soon be replaced by AI Agents.
ReplyDeleteYawn. Who will be ruled over by that same programmers.
Oh, wait. They'll be given other name. Not programmers. And that will mean that that'll be somebody else.
Because name "programmers" and people called programmers... that is one and the same things. In itself.%-))))
Yaaaaawn.
See... packer's behavior. They do not like when things they place in their boxes... do not fit-in, torn that boxes apart, gone missing, start crawling off that boxes.)))))
What a rebellious uprisal ))))) against "only right way"... of packing. ;-p
;P
Delete//-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
ReplyDeletelol! Criticism from one who can't scientifically and chemically account for the origin of life.
Yap.
Distinct reaction of a packer. ;-)
Why mapper should care? While his interest is IN PROCESS... not end and definite result.
Step 2... NOT 3!
DeleteYap. If you know how it works. If you *KNOW* the technology of it.
ReplyDeleteYou can devise a plan of what to do with it.
Otherwise... you can only burn incense with hope "gods" will like their smell and fulfill your wishes.)))))))
November 25, 2025 at 2:26 AM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
If you "know" the requirements for a technology and can "specify" at least one component, others can go from there, especially if that component is the "interface"... aka (a microtubule piercing the cell membrane that serves a specific function - fuel, cooling, bio-electric information...).
Already did.
Already people doing it.
Like I saw in news, drones developer started to test their designs inside simulation. As more cheap method.
Or... already mentioned here Bezos, started new busines of AI helping with engineering.
See? Progress is unstoppable.
And you have NO strength. NO techs... to prevent it from happening. ;-P
I don't? EMP. Welcome back to the stone age.
DeleteWhat, your computer isn't Tempest AND Radhard?
Delete//To prevent a ridiculous speculative bubble from forming, and then collapsing in a spectacular fashion, like Dutch East India Co. "Tulip" futures. Remember the dot.com bubble?
ReplyDeleteNot first. Not last.
1929 - Great Depression. Not 1st, not last.
DeleteYap.
Delete""Packers always pretend that the map is the territory, play some silly word games, and then claim that they own integers and so on.""
ReplyDelete;-P
November 25, 2025 at 1:32 PM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
???
November 25, 2025 at 4:23 PM
Your reaction to my claim that "words are just labels", shadows of a thing, not things itself.
November 26, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Your arguments to authorities too. Like nitsche or kant too.
I have THREE distinct stone cold reasons to NOT "believe in words":
FIRST. As foreigner, even though I use your lang (and latters), they are meaningless to me.
SECOND. As programmer, I used to call things arbitrarily. That is called "identifers". And choice of it absolutely up to aesthetics and common sense of a programmer.
THIRD. As engineer. I know that words are meaningless.
There is no "sturdy metal", only number of its strenght checked... by Brunel or by Rockwell ;-)
Words mean nothing. It's the relations between words that mean everything. "The cat is on the mat" The "structure". And then one must analyse the power hierarchies within that structure to understand the "environment" in which the structure is organized. (Discourse analysis). Lacanian formula.
DeleteStructuralism: Structuralism is a theoretical approach that interprets human culture, thought, and behavior by examining the underlying structures and patterns that give them meaning. It views phenomena as parts of larger systems, much like how words get their meaning from their relationship to other words in a language. Key applications of structuralism include analyzing language, social structures in anthropology, and narrative patterns in literature.
Post-Structuralism: Post-structuralism is a philosophical and literary movement that emerged in the late 20th century, critiquing structuralism by arguing that meaning is not fixed or stable but is fluid, complex, and shaped by power structures and the reader's context. Key figures like Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault are associated with this movement, which emphasizes the instability of language, the deconstruction of binary oppositions, and the idea that subjectivity is constructed through discourse. It also questions universal truths and highlights how power operates to shape knowledge and social reality.
You know my answer. Lem used Technologies as "theoretical approach that interprets human culture, thought, and behavior". And he succeeded.
DeleteMan is no longer Man. He is post-human. His technologies are the "materials" he manipulates (Step 2). Man is Cyborg, his information is stored outside of his body (in books/ computers). Man needs technologies to continue to evolve. He can evolve "chaotically" (ala Planaria) or "orderly" (ala Newt). The problem is in the algorithm he selects to use, and that "algorithm" is adaptable thru the collective culture.
DeleteThat... is where you mistaken.
DeleteCulture -- it's always and only an artefact.
Created. NOT Creator.
Yawn.
It's from me as programmer.
DeleteWhen you tat-a-tat with computer... there is NO culture to help you.
You are like that Iluwatar. You can create your ainurs. And make em thing to you. ;-)
“We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us” - Marshall McLuhan
DeleteYes media... the "tech" leads, and a culture develops from it. Sometimes its' a good thing that develops. Sometimes its' not. Knowing all in advance? impossible. It takes a new tech to cure (thru time and natural selection) a bad one. What's good for China may not be "good" for the US (and visa versa). Why put all the tech eggs in one basket (Open Society)? Let every country develop their own (US and Tik Tok). The US IC doesn't need any foreign exploits being introduced. And we (US IC) no longer should seek to control every foreign government (capability building- USAID) in an "Open Society" exploit environment.
We share too many "bad" habits (spread woke culture).
Delete//...because there is no rationality to connect them other than to discern the different/ distinct goods of both being sought in each, and noting their difference (Difference and Repetition).
ReplyDeleteKey word here are "discern".
How????
November 25, 2025 at 12:14 PM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
social relation between Master:Hysteric::University:Analyst
Words. Words. Words.©
Refer to comment above - structuralism/ post-structuralism.
Delete//The only difference is that it assembles EVERY combination and uses natural selection (and many, many generations if useful) to determine which ones were useful and contributed to the organism's survival.
ReplyDeleteSame what people do within Technologies.
Yap... and combine into higher and higher assembles.. ie - "Eagle Eye"
DeleteMy childhood friend used to market this. He used to stop by when he was attending conventions in DC. He have me a bag that is used to store the helmet. It's my "go" bag now.
Delete//Yes, stop selling "goods". Keep all the "goods" for ourselves.
ReplyDeleteEven that goods that need foreign parts/resources/labour?
Are you follower of cult of cargo???:-)))
That's what Intelligence Services are for.
DeleteYou know, the same ones who work to steal Ukraine's resources after having failed to steal Russia's.
Delete)))))))
Delete//That's because they built their factories in Asia where the labour costs were cheap, and now their products are subject to tariffs...
ReplyDeleteNovember 26, 2025 at 9:28 AM
Yep. And USA receives sweet-sweet profits from it. And your stocks going up, up and UP.
BUT, you do not want profits... only worn underpants.:-))))
The trickle downs from those corporate "profits" keep drying up. Time to redistribute them in a more "anti-fragile" manner. Commerce, NOT Capitalism.
DeleteCommunism! %-))))
DeleteTake the power from the top, and put it in the middle (Step 2) where it belongs.
Delete...the petit bourgeois
DeleteA society of Prosumers, not producers and consumers.
DeleteI said it long ago.
DeleteOnly New Tech can turn that table.
Like my for example, it need and even demand -- for humans to start living in the Ocean. And then in the Space. And then -- among stars.
Were, on the next turn of that spiral, they'll necessary be self-sufficient.
A culture for building and using tech is what we need. An "anti-fragile" and adaptable one. From the chaos of the planarian into the order of a Newt.
DeleteThen... coming III world VVAR will help you. ;-p
DeleteMolon labe!
Delete//Wakanda didn't share their tech, did they?
ReplyDeleteSame us fairies in fairytales. Yawn. :-))))
Only that nasty Pinky... did shared her pixie dust. :-))))
...with the Lost boys in Neverland?
DeleteYou gotcha. :-)
DeleteYou see? I understand all your arguments like "Refer to comment above - structuralism/ post-structuralism."
Just (while providing direct and obvious counterarguments) not see em... important?
Adding some value?
DeleteGiving some clues?
DeleteMeans... as mapper/traveler do not see ever pebble on the road as artifact for one's collection.
DeleteUnlike packer. ;-p
Sure, I love your comments, they make me think and develop the means of outwardly expressing my intuition.
DeleteAnd yes, I believe in Meta-narratives. Every "culture" is like a bio-electric pattern. I don't favour a single pattern (Narrative). I favour adaptability of patterns, of learning how to transform one into another (to meet new/ different environmental challenges).
Like in Russia-Ukraine War. Ukraine is like a cancer that refuses to communicate with the cells next to it. Trump is therefore shutting down other bio-electric ion channels and forcing it into re-establishing Russian communication.
//of learning how to transform one into another (to meet new/ different environmental challenges).
DeleteYap. That's Technology.
Even "trial and error" is a technology. That's why you need good "error correction" technology.
DeleteWhat can be better "err corrector"... then outside skeptic? ;-p
Delete,,,or an inside one.
DeleteThen, wellcome on the board. ;-p
Delete...of Alternative Intelligence, Inc.
Deleteab Ovo Incorporated. ;-p
DeletePut it to the Board for a vote.
Deletebtw - Where's the rest of the Board and who has the majority voting shares?
Delete//btw - Where's the rest of the Board and who has the majority voting shares?
DeleteYep. What I would do without packer on the board?
Such things even did not come to my mind...
I just hope it isn't Sam Altman, he's such a power hungry wanker! ;)
DeleteNot accessible. :-/
Delete""People suffering from M0 really aren’t very good at appreciating feedback effects. They can only think one step ahead. Tramlines that can be policed can kind of hold societies of M0 people together, but have no inherent value beyond this, since the universe cannot in fact be understood procedurally. Moreover, people suffering from M0 can always do the unspeakable, and then deny it. The need for self-honesty so that their maps can be maintained accurately isn’t there, since they have no maps to maintain.""
ReplyDeleteNovember 25, 2025 at 1:29 PM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
What is MO? Modus Operandi?
M-zero, actually.
And what does M0 mean?
DeleteWho cares?
DeleteThat's just word.
Yawn.
Like "asshole", asshole?
DeleteBaaaka. ;-p
Delete@@
DeleteYap. Something like that, kso yaro.;-p
Delete-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
ReplyDeleteTruth, as processed through social relations.
November 25, 2025 at 4:14 PM
There is no truth there. Only use-fool-nest.
Yaaaawn.
"You are my sister"© by Lem ;-p
ReplyDelete//Ukraine is like a cancer
ReplyDeleteNot Russia? Not China? Not... USA? ;-)
They are all communicating.
DeleteUkraine refuse communications with its' neighbors. Like the Hermit Kingdom.
Delete...and America is going to continue to communicate. Just not about Science or Technologies.
DeleteThe Post-WWII "Open Society" Consensus is over. America is closing.
Delete//they make me think and develop the means of outwardly expressing my intuition.
ReplyDeleteThat is the truth you still not know. ;-)
Mind. Staying alone. Freakingly UNABLE to produce. (why you think that Iluvatar created his ainurs? why such idea, came into mind of autor -- Tolkien? why god(s) created man? why we ourself so bent on creation (but, men only;-))
That's why I seeking for a team...
...to defy the G_ds...
DeleteI'm way too stupid for that team.
Hack.
DeleteThere's no gods. Just us. Yawn.
Scary thing to admit. I know.
Then I'm way too smart for THAT team.
DeleteNobody is perfect. ;-p
DeleteYou know what they tell me? To not say that I am too old, to be programmer anymore?
Delete"You are... overqualified, for this position" ))))
Overqualified = too expensive. You need get into the H1-B program.
DeleteEven if agree to lower payment?
DeleteNope. You'll need every penny to live in Silicon Valley. My parents home was bought for $17k. It's now worth $1.4m. The interest on a $1.4m home will cost you more than they can pay you. That's why I live in MD.
DeleteI... far-far-away from it.
DeleteYawn.
That's what the H1-B's for.
Deletebtw - The traffic really sucks.
//They are all communicating.
ReplyDeleteLike japanese over Perl Harbor? %-)))
They called the Tower @ Hickam asking landing instructions?
DeleteTrump's trying to land you, Mykola!
Delete)))))))
DeleteWhat for? To speed up Perl Harbor 2.0?
Do you know that Russia now Full Throttle with making their children I-Iitleryungers.
And there over 12 millions of em.
Yawn.
You are just like your moronic DEMN pre-censure here... that not allowed to post me comment above.
DeleteMentioning "that one whose name not allowed to mentIon"
Yawn.
Man up, USA.
...pull up, pull up, you're coming in hot and your landing gear hasn't come down...
DeleteWhom RFia. can nuke up freely??? Without pollution flying back into their heartland?
DeleteWhose men and women they need, to keep being Slavic and Orthodox?
Whom they want just to relocate and not exterminate?
WHO, intertwined through inter-marriages and blood relations???
Of course, that is Russians... and Americans. Yap. That's it. That is the Truth.
And that is Ukraine... they want to destroy with nukelar tsunamis in the ocean. And build thousand miles flying nukes.
(SIC)
//Ukraine refuse communications with its' neighbors. Like the Hermit Kingdom.
ReplyDeleteLike Israel? %-)))
No longer. Trump's blocked some of their ion channels, too.
DeleteHeh... just like nazis? ;-p
DeleteYeah, like w/ Jericho trumpets!
DeleteLike USA "subdued" Japan... pre-PH? ;-p
DeleteSanctions... like Russia today. It just p*ssed them off.
DeleteYep!
Delete//The Post-WWII "Open Society" Consensus is over. America is closing.
ReplyDeleteUntil Pearl Harbor 2.0.
Yawn.
Molon labe then. :)
DeleteEven with current techs... it can be that you'd be caught with your pants off in a toilet. Far-far from your molon. ;-p
DeletePS Why that idea not obvious??? Even as purely abstract idea?
I know, I know. Culture that NEVER fought in a war against agressors on own territory.
Yawn.
Well... it's damn interesting in itself. As for mapper... it's very natural to look beyond horizont (like Columbus -- percieve India beyond that Ocean.
DeleteBut how it works with packer???
Some scary-scary thing? Like thing withoud box? Or box that cannot be populated? ;-p
Anything can happen. And when it does...
Delete"Intelligence is a fixed goal with variable means of achieving it" - William James.
Ah... fear of uncertainty. Just as have thought. ;-)
DeleteThat's not fear of uncertainty. That's "In G_d we Trust!". It's even on the quarters.
DeleteLike I care...
DeleteYou need to understand the American mind set. Most of us here aren't control freaks like the idiots that got you into this Russia war.
DeleteI already know that you are antipodes not for nothing... and your POV are usually upside down. ;-p
DeleteThank you.
...a fair point.
DeleteWell... I have no doubts that I am antipode to you. Though, you rarely admit it.
DeleteYep.
ReplyDeleteAs for foreigner, swearing in foreign language, do not work on me. Naturally.
Yawn.
Like, do you care being called bad name in some unknown to you language?
Like, if I'd cal you "baka". ;-p
PS Thats exactly what I meant. But you, still not believe me?)))
Swear words aren't conscious. They bypass all Oedipal classifications and organizations. They're like purloined letters. They always arrive at their destination.
DeleteThey're spoken by real emotions, not instilled cordycep control systems.
DeleteNot to foreigner. Where it first need to be translated...
Delete...with "ironic distance'.
DeleteNaaah.
Delete"Lost in translation"™
...or qui pro quo (a misunderstanding).
DeleteThe phrase qui pro quo, or quiproquo (from medieval Latin: literally qui instead of quo), is common in languages such as Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and French, where it means a misunderstanding.
Naaah.
DeleteHave you experience learning foreign language? Getting knowing other culture?
+4
"Swearing in" can mean several things in Swahili, including to "take an oath" (apa kiapo or kula yamini) or to "administer an oath" (apisha), as well as to curse or use profanity (tukana or apiza). The specific term depends on the context.
To take an oath
Apa kiapo / Kula kiapo: To take an oath.
Apa yamini / Kula yamini: To swear an oath, often for a specific purpose like on a religious text.
Apa kabisa: To swear to something with conviction or to vow to do something.
To administer an oath
Apisha: To make someone swear an oath or to swear someone into office.
To curse or use profanity
Tukana / Apiza: To curse or swear at someone.
Laana: The word for "curse".
Tusi: A swear word or insult.
Uchafu: Profanity.
Mshenzi: A common insult meaning "fool" or "idiot".
Pumbavu: Another insult, similar to "idiot".
So, would you care being called... Tusi? Or Mshenzi? ;-p
You need to read Joyce's "Finnegans Wake"....
Delete"Context" will only get you so far...
Google AI: Context is of paramount importance to understanding Finnegans Wake because it is constantly being fractured, reshaped, and reinvented through a multilingual, dreamlike style that relies on wordplay, puns, and associations. Instead of a fixed historical or authorial context, the book's meaning is generated through its own linguistic and narrative systems, requiring readers to construct context by tracing patterns, allusions, and linguistic roots from a vast network of languages and historical references. The importance is not in a single, unifying context, but in the process of grappling with countless shifting contexts created by the text itself, making the reader an active participant in its meaning-making.
...schizoid lines of flight and mixing categorical contexts.
Delete...wordplay, puns, and associations.
DeleteYou know, that I like wordplay.
But same time, it is the hardest part of understanding foreign language.
Remember how I was responding to Derpy? That I, as foreigner, cannot know all such nitty-gritty contexts...
I appreciate a good double entendre... it allows escapes from nitty-gritty contexts... new lines of flight to deterritorialize/ re-territorialize meanings.
DeleteAnd I regret when I cannot provide/follow it. (((
DeleteMe too. Implicit vs explicit meanings. Esoteric vs Exoteric writings (Leo Strauss, "Persecution and the Art of Writing")
Delete...which is why there is so much interest in the "occult".
DeleteLeo Strauss
DeleteThe expression "writing between the lines" indicates the subject of this article. For the influence of persecution on literature is precisely that it compels all writers who hold heterodox views to develop a peculiar technique of writing, the technique which we have in mind when speaking of writing between the lines.This expression is clearly metaphoric. Any attempt to express its meaning in unmetaphoric language would lead to the discovery of a terra incognita, a field whose very dimensions are as yet unexplored and which offers ample scope for highly intriguing and even important investigations.
Andrei Tarkovsky
Delete“We can express our feelings regarding the world around us either by poetic or by descriptive means... I prefer to express myself metaphorically. Let me stress: metaphorically, not symbolically. A symbol contains within itself a definite meaning, certain intellectual formula, while metaphor is an image. An image possessing the same distinguishing features as the world it represents. An image — as opposed to a symbol — is indefinite in meaning. One cannot speak of the infinite world by applying tools that are definite and finite. We can analyse the formula that constitutes a symbol, while metaphor is a being-within-itself, it’s a monomial. It falls apart at any attempt of touching it."
You saying that to one with Soviet experience.
DeleteWhere, if one NOT metaphorical enough... one can swiftly gone... to discover secrets of Siberia. And that is not that pleasant orientalistic things you so like to imagine.
But extreme cold, hunger and inevitable death from nasty desires... I mean, deseases. ;-p
Sorry, it's been 30 years since I read Solzhenitsyn...
DeleteGo say you like frizzing cold. ;-p
DeleteLike.
ReplyDeleteHow do you read this -- "Freiheit". Doesn't it looks like Free Hate? ;-p
Yep... great line of flight, from liberty to hate.
ReplyDeleteThe subcontexts in syllables (Plato, "Cratylus")
Deletelike justice, just is, just ice, law for you (latin jus tis)
Delete...but not for me. lines of flight... a qui pro quo (misunderstanding - often deliberate between cynic and kynic)
Delete...knave and fool (depending upon discourse - master/ university/ hysteric/ analyst).
Delete...and where the surplus jouissance lands.
Delete...cut the balls, as Kronos did to Ouranos (resulting in the birth of Aphrodite). ;)
DeleteLike.
ReplyDeleteHow do you read this -- "Freiheit". Doesn't it looks like Free Hate? ;-p
November 28, 2025 at 3:33 AM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
Yep... great line of flight, from liberty to hate.
Which mean freedom in German. Nevertheless.
Usual thing with translation.
Dominion of the free
DeleteJus Utendi
Jus Fruendi
Jus Abutendi
Google AI:
DeleteJus/ Ius
In Latin, "ius" primarily means right, law, or justice. It can also function as a grammatical suffix, such as the ending -ius, used to form adjectives or Latinize surnames. The specific meaning of ius depends heavily on its context within a sentence.
Meanings of ius
Law: Refers to the body of rules that govern society.
Right: Indicates a legal or moral entitlement a person has.
Justice: Denotes the concept of fairness and the place where one goes to seek justice.
Legal Bond: Can refer to a legally binding agreement or a form of legal claim.
The suffix -ius
Adjective formation: Used to form adjectives that indicate "belonging to" or "made of" a noun, such as rēgius (kingly, from rēx "king").
Latinization of surnames: Added to surnames, especially in New Latin, to create a Latinized version, for example, "Descartes" becomes "Cartesius".
Examples in context
Ius gentium: "Law of nations" or international law.
Ius civile: "Civil law," the law that applied only to Roman citizens.
Summum ius: "The highest law" or "the letter of the law