.

And by a prudent flight and cunning save A life which valour could not, from the grave. A better buckler I can soon regain, But who can get another life again? Archilochus

Thursday, July 4, 2019

Poet of the American Revolution

A Picture from the Life
To serve with love,
And shed your blood,
Approved may be above,
But here below
(Example shew,)
‘Tis dangerous to be good.
--Lord Oxford

Deep in a vale, a stranger now to arms,
Too poor to shine in courts, too proud to beg,
He, who once warred on Saratoga’s plains,
Sits musing o’er his scars, and wooden leg.

Remembering still the toil of former days,
To other hands he sees his earnings paid;--
They share the due reward—he feeds on praise.
Lost in the abyss of want, misfortune’s shade.

Far, far from domes where splendid tapers glare,
‘Tis his from dear bought peace no wealth to win,
Removed alike from courtly cringing ‘squires,
The great-man’s Levee, and the proud man’s grin.

Sold are those arms which once on Britons blazed,
When, flushed with conquest, to the charge they came;
That power repelled, and Freedom’s fabrick raised,
She leaves her soldier—famine and a name!
--Philip Freneau, "The American Soldier"


15 comments:

Gert said...

Oh no. Is this where I'm supposed to say 'Happy Independence Day'?

;-)

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

No, as a Brit you're expected to say, "Good riddance to bad rubbish!"

...but the former is MUCH more appreciated. :)

Franco Aragosta said...

___________ FIREWORKS ___________



The fountains in the sky in brilliance burst

Over throngs who thrill as patterns spread

In radiant arms of glowing hues disbursed

Natant in the blackness overhead.

Deafening as any cannonade

Explosions follow soon the hiss and squeal ––
Preliminaries to the star brigade

Erupting floridly, yet quite unreal.

Naumachia was naught compare to this

Delirium. Decorum’s cast aside.

Enraptured like Narcissus we know bliss,

Non sequitur to what’s seen nationwide.

Could joy we take in heaven’s fireworks

Earthbound hold us, while the Devil smirks?


~ FreeThinke

Franco Aragosta said...

_____ A Libertarian Manifesto _____

The frustration with our government’s immense
Obtuse, insensitive and insincere
As congress seems. The cost of food and rents
Lawsuits, cars and school fees –– also dear ––
Insurance coverage too –– should be exempt ––
Be FREED from leeching levied from On High!
Ensure our freedoms. Do not tempt
Reprobates and Dupes wth The Big Lie:
That Someone Else should have to bear their weight.
A Helping Hand cannot in chains be held.
Resentment there soon festers into Hate
Instead of Help. The death of Hope is knelled.
Ambition to coerce Compassion kills ––
Nurturing Nihilism’s deadly thrills.



~ FreeThinke

Franco Aragosta said...

Philip Morin Freneau, the New-York-born son of a French Huguenot wine merchant and his Scottish wife, was a remarkable character. Considering the difficulties he faced it seems almost a miracle that he lived to the age of eighty –– unusual for men of his his time.

From what I can gather from the small samples given his poetry is a bit too grandiloquent, too self-consciously high-flown, and bombastic to be considered the equaal in any way of Ralph Waldo Emerson or Edgar Allan Poe, his contemporaries, which freneau is said ossibly to have influenced.

Smith's somewhat strained portrayal suggests an aura of Vanity and posturing Self-Importance, which may be reflective of Freneau's true character –– or may simply be a bit of ham acting. I suspect a bit of both.

The Allen woman who "introduced" the piece was perfectly dreadful. Her stilted delivery mars whatever credibility and dramatic affect the piece may have had.

Were I to present this video, i would EXCISE Ms Allen's tedious, completely unnecessary remarks. Her absence would doubtless enhance the quality of the presentation immeasurably.

Freneau's close friednship woth James Madison is probably one of the most sugnificant thungs about hm. His apparent enmity with George Washington and apparent dislike for Thomas Jefferson makes him suspect in my not-too-well-informed estimation.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

His enmity was with Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, both members of Washington's inner circle of cabinet members. Madison and Jefferson were also on the opposite side of Adams/Hamilton and their National Bank faction, and struggling, via Republican newspapers, for Washington's favour.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

You must remember that after the war, Washington formed a "heredity-based" Society of the Cincinnati, smacking of a new aristocracy. He may not have pronounced himself a "king"... but establishing an aristocracy was not anything that Jerffersonian Americans desired, either.

Franco Aragosta said...

And yet virtually ALL the Founders were de facto aristocarats, whether they chose to recognize it or not.

I' a great admirer of gift salty grndeur an refinement What I detest most about my wn lifetime is the way the wrost sorts of vulgarity have gained ascendancy, and more or less flush high quaky out of the cultre at virtually every turn.

There ARE no Ladies and Gentlmen anymore –– only baseborn, and ill-bred bitches and bastards. (:-o

I believe in treatng everyone FAIRLY, KINDLY, and DECENTLY, but I most emphatically do NOT believe that we are all EQUAL, Prima faciea evidence tells just the opposite.

Sorry to use a cliché, but "THE CREAM ALWAYS RISES to the TOP." To deny that ––or denigrate it –– flies in the face of REALITY.

Gert said...

I'll stick it on a postcard then!

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

An aristocracy of merit, not blood... although I do favor Goethe over Beethoven in the "traditional" context as "merit" is sometimes difficult to recognize as optics tend to distort realities.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

ALL the Founders were de facto aristocarats...

Try telling that to Ben Franklin when Parliament had him in their Starr Chamber.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

...Ben always was "ironic". The Lunar Society... he who laughs last, laughs best!

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

:)

Franco Aragosta said...

Aristocrats have not always been supportive of one another, and many have fallen out of favor with the monarch of the day. That does not stop them from BEING aristocrats.

I doubt that all of them simply pranced around in powdered perukes, satin wasitcoats and eegantly tailored frock coats, knee breeches, and brass buckled patent leather shoes looking down their long noses at their "inferiors" while grinding their heels into the necks of the poor and needy.

Neither did many of them spend much of their time raping their poor defenseless slave women, Kyle nstott notwithstanding.

We wouldn't have much of the great Art, Music, Architecture, Literature, Horticulture and great feats of engineering and inventiveness without the patrinage of bot the Church AND the Aristocracy.

And as the French and Russian Revolutions –– and our bloody Civil War –– proved conclusively one the PEASANTS take over, CHAOS ensues, and BRUTE SAVAGERY REIGNS SUPREME.

I love these words from one of our greatest Founding Fathers:

"I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy. My sons ought to study mathematics and philosophy, geography, natural history, naval architecture, navigation, commerce, and agriculture, in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry, and porcelain.



~ John Adams (1735 - 1826)




-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

I've been watching the Netflix series "Bolivar"... Filmed in Columbia recently, it was initially condemned by Venezuela's Nicholas Maduro as likely hit piece. If ever there were an argument to made against the aristocracy, this was it, as the Spanish are portrayed as incompetent and the creollo's as their competent, if not slightly more ugly step-sisters.