Farmers Letters: Labelling Trump as the "Reactionary International" Highlights the Intellectual Vacuity of the Progressive Left

Sunday, May 31, 2020

Labelling Trump as the "Reactionary International" Highlights the Intellectual Vacuity of the Progressive Left

The Progressive international is About to Re-Launch DiEM25 and proto-One World Government this December
The Future of DiEM25 is Speeding Towards Chinese Authoritarian-Style State Controlled and Directed Capitalism (The Chinese as their "model"). The Left learned NOTHING from the collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). Reflection is obviously not their strong suit. But then again, did the Frankurt School ever perform a self-critique of Marxist Socialism as extensive as their critique of NAZI fascism? Their critical eye NEVER turns inward.

5 comments:

Franco Aragosta said...: FYI: I habe poste Clarice Feldman's valuable analysis published in today's AMERICAN THINKER in its entirety at my blog

The COMMENTS section, however, remains CLOED.

We encourage you to READ MORE, THINK MORE and OPINE LESS.; May 31, 2020 at 2:12 PM
Franco Aragosta said...: NOAM HOMSKY is a dour dreary, profoundly EVIL old bastard.

He has the personality of a VILE, distinctively FOUL ODOR.; May 31, 2020 at 2:15 PM
Joe Conservative said...: AN old Marxist still dreaming of Cuban style revolutions...; June 2, 2020 at 7:25 AM
The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders said...: "Noam Homsky" must be Franco's real name.; June 2, 2020 at 8:02 AM
-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...: As "Dizzy Dervish" must be yours...; June 2, 2020 at 11:52 AM

Andrei Tarkovsky

“We can express our feelings regarding the world around us either by poetic or by descriptive means... I prefer to express myself metaphorically. Let me stress: metaphorically, not symbolically. A symbol contains within itself a definite meaning, certain intellectual formula, while metaphor is an image. An image possessing the same distinguishing features as the world it represents. An image — as opposed to a symbol — is indefinite in meaning. One cannot speak of the infinite world by applying tools that are definite and finite. We can analyse the formula that constitutes a symbol, while metaphor is a being-within-itself, it’s a monomial. It falls apart at any attempt of touching it."