.

And by a prudent flight and cunning save A life which valour could not, from the grave. A better buckler I can soon regain, But who can get another life again? Archilochus

Tuesday, September 23, 2025

Dialectic: Generation FROM Opposites, Not Separation into Polemic Bailey's sans Mottes

Lindsay's Neological Woke Right Doesn't Carry the Woke frame (aka- filled with the Guilt-Pride Group Identity ideological frame).  It's a Strategic Argument to Prevent the Left from Splitting of the Right into 2 Sub-Factions (and it ISN'T True that there's a Woke Right, the necessary Guilt-Pride Ideology ISN'T there).

Lindsay's definition of Woke is to Bi-Polarize arguments (Generating either Reflexive Mania or Depression) into B&W Polar Dialectics (aka- Polemics), NOT actual Socratic nor Hegelian Dialectics that explore the Meden Agan Grey Areas.  Polemics distill arguments  into Thesis OR Antithesis, NEVER producing a Hegelian Synthesis.  Thesis:Antithesis::Synthesis.

James... Polemics aren't Dialectics.  They're the one part of an ever-iterating Dialectical Process to Generate a logical Synthesis.  All you're doing is instilling an artificial Ideological Split within the Right that you think becomes Invulnerable to Leftist Entryism

There is an ACTUAL split in the Right between Commerce (Main Street) and Capitalism (Wall Street).  The Commerce (Main Street) position is a return to Paleo-Conservatism from Neo-Conservatism (Wall St. position).  As we're slipping away from Free Markets into Controlled Technofeudal Search-Directed Markets. we'd be wise to address this ACTUAL split in "The Right", and not get driven into the ditch of Wokeness.

No comments: