.

And by a prudent flight and cunning save A life which valour could not, from the grave. A better buckler I can soon regain, But who can get another life again? Archilochus

Saturday, March 14, 2026

A Paradigm for Economic Book-Keeping (Quantum) for Physics Enthusiasts

...on the edges of Slower Matter-based "Deposit and Withdrawal Currencies" Used by Quantum Zero-Point Energy Field Banks Conducting Transactions at the Speed of Light (C)-ausality) being slowed down at the Matter-Energy Interfaces by Matter

 
Light: The Feynman Path-Integral Approach

Feynman's path integral approach is a formulation of quantum mechanics where a particle, traveling from point A to B, takes every possible path simultaneously, rather than a single trajectory. The total quantum probability is found by summing ("integrating") the complex amplitudes of all these paths, weighted by 
, where 
 is the action.
Key aspects of the Feynman path integral formulation include:
  • Sum Over Histories: Instead of just one classical path (least action), every conceivable path—no matter how strange—contributes to the final outcome, as explained on this Quanta Magazine article.
  • Action (
    ):
     Each path is weighted by 
    , where 
     (time integral of the Lagrangian).
  • Interference: Paths close to the classical "least action" trajectory contribute constructively (similar phase), while erratic paths interfere destructively, making the classical path the most probable one.
  • Fundamental Technique: Developed by Richard Feynman in 1948, it is a key tool in quantum field theory and statistical mechanics, notes this Binghamton University document.
This approach is highly valuable because it provides a visual interpretation of quantum phenomena and works well for relativistic field theories, whereas the traditional Schrodinger equation is often harder to apply in those cases.
Constructing Causal Narratives
 
Enter... The Observer

26 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hah... and what you gained after diving into Feynmanverse? ;-)
I guess -- nothing.
Same as with (GO)Lemverse. ;-p

Anonymous said...

\\Antimemes are real. Think of any piece of information which you wouldn't share with anybody, like passwords, taboos and dirty secrets. Or any piece of information which would be difficult to share even if you tried: complex equations, very boring passages of text, large blocks of random numbers, and dreams…

But anomalous antimemes are another matter entirely. How do you contain something you can't record or remember? How do you fight a war against an enemy with effortless, perfect camouflage, when you can never even know that you're at war?


hah... ha-hah... ha-ha-ha-ha))))))))))))))))))))))))))

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

My mind has been blown. I have a whole new paradigm. I'm still trying to wrap my head around the observer "information" problem in the double slit problem though.... classical (when observed), quantum (when not) (many worlds or not).

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Indeed. The Oedipal guilt-pride problem, where you repress the memory taboo's (incest/ guilt-pride) When Oedipus learns the truth (Jocasta is his mother) he blinds himself with her brooches (psychic repression) and must spend the rest of his life (before going underground in the Garden of the Eumenides (Furies) @ Colonus) being led about by his surviving daughter/sister Ismene.

The memory is permanently repressed/ can't be though about (Oedipal Complex). Sex with your mother creates the guilt... and the pride from no longer being able to think about it. Guilt-Pride.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

btw - Zizek thinks that sinthomes (ie memes) are the psychic energy equivalent of quanta... in his most recent article "Trump as a Reader of Lacan" at least. He may be on to something. Little "quants" of jouissance/ joy-sense...

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Lacanian sinthome - Function: It serves to knot together the three Lacanian registers—Imaginary, Symbolic, and Real—preventing psychic fragmentation.

Anonymous said...

Whatever. Suit your time.
I can only suggest you that that is dead end.
As we living in a "classical" world anyway. And all we can do is classical too.
And only way to workaround it -- master classical techs and polish em till reach to next level will be feasible.

No king's highways into it. No free lunches.
Only LOTS of (hard? but to lazy everything hard) work

Yawn.

Anonymous said...

You too concentrating on it...

well, your (non)choice -- your (non)freedom.

Anonymous said...

Was I not giving you this link?
https://ashleyrpollard.blogspot.com/2025/06/live-chat-with-author-ashley-r-pollard.html

Anonymous said...

\\I'm still trying to wrap my head around the observer "information" problem in the double slit problem though....

Dunno why it boggles your mind%%%%)

Do you have problem with dancers influencing each other?
Most surely -- no.
And that is what we are dancing tango -- Reality... and each of us (aka Observers). ;-P

Anonymous said...

Wanna know something truly fascinating? And fresh new (or, eternally old; depend on POV) to boot? ;-)
Well, I cannot give garanty of authenticity, by obvious reasons. But to my mind it just came. ;-P

You know, if flow of time is really just an illusion. And known to us arrow from Past and into the Future is all wrong...

it gives us interesting perspectives that reconcile problems of Science. Like problem of Infinity.
Like, you know, all started from infinitely tight Singularity -- go figure what that "infinitely tight" could mean???%%%)))
and it all spreads infintely in time and space... so even scientists abandoned such views, as boringly virgin of meanings,
and trying to explore "heartbeat of the Universe".

But, if time moves in opposite direction actually. It means we can throw into the window all inifinities. ;-)
And state that all starts from some Initial... very sparse and very vast, yeah, but still finite... State.
And then, only thrinking, into what looks like... yeah "infinitely tight singularity".

Really, we do not need neither time nor space for that... as separate and actual entities. Of unknown origin and properties.
Just some elementary elements, that able to "recombinate" with each other -- that enough for simulating of all movment we see and know 'bout.
Like in Conway's Game of Life. Or falling dominos.

It even able to reconcile Science with Religion. And Western religions with Eastern to boot. ;-)

As in... Nirvana described as ultimate goal -- state of nothingness and non-change -- but that is exactly what Singularity is in this view.
And christianity long as tackling with god being all knowing and all mighty... but, reluctant to interfere into earthly spheres.
But... he is, in such scheme, as he is one who created that Initial State, in which all knowladge, all information incorporated.
And he is all-loving, as he created us with such an opposite time perception -- to not see only thrink and decay before us. And have free will.
And the thrill of revealing vast Future before us. While reason we do not, cannot, remember Future is because information about it perma-destroyed.
And exist now only in HIS mind.

And... it compatible with my ideas -- as scattering and dispersing Humanity among stars -- that is perfectly in accordance with HIS will. ;-)

Anonymous said...

Wanna know something truly fascinating? And fresh new (or, eternally old; depend on POV) to boot? ;-)
Well, I cannot give garanty of authenticity, by obvious reasons. But to my mind it just came. ;-P

You know, if flow of time is really just an illusion. And known to us arrow from Past and into the Future is all wrong...

it gives us interesting perspectives that reconcile problems of Science. Like problem of Infinity.
Like, you know, all started from infinitely tight Singularity -- go figure what that "infinitely tight" could mean???%%%)))
and it all spreads infintely in time and space... so even scientists abandoned such views, as boringly virgin of meanings,
and trying to explore "heartbeat of the Universe".

But, if time moves in opposite direction actually. It means we can throw into the window all inifinities. ;-)
And state that all starts from some Initial... very sparse and very vast, yeah, but still finite... State.
And then, only thrinking, into what looks like... yeah "infinitely tight singularity".

Really, we do not need neither time nor space for that... as separate and actual entities. Of unknown origin and properties.
Just some elementary elements, that able to "recombinate" with each other -- that enough for simulating of all movment we see and know 'bout.
Like in Conway's Game of Life. Or falling dominos.

It even able to reconcile Science with Religion. And Western religions with Eastern to boot. ;-)

As in... Nirvana described as ultimate goal -- state of nothingness and non-change -- but that is exactly what Singularity is in this view.
And christianity long as tackling with god being all knowing and all mighty... but, reluctant to interfere into earthly spheres.
But... he is, in such scheme, as he is one who created that Initial State, in which all knowladge, all information incorporated.
And he is all-loving, as he created us with such an opposite time perception -- to not see only thrink and decay before us. And have free will.
And the thrill of revealing vast Future before us. While reason we do not, cannot, remember Future is because information about it perma-destroyed.
And exist now only in HIS mind.

And... it compatible with my ideas -- as scattering and dispersing Humanity among stars -- that is perfectly in accordance with HIS will. ;-)

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

There are a whole bunch of AI generated Feynman talks now. I was skeptacle at first, but now am really enjoying them. I now wish there had been something similar available when I was taking Physics as an undergrad Engineering major.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Matter is merely all the "stuff" (particles and atoms) that isn't travelling at the speed of light (causality) and experiences time based upon its' relative velocity. Photons experience no "time" as they are travelling at light speed. Eternity rests in them. We can still see them from billions of years ago as they pass us... photon emissions from stars billions of light-years away. We are literally observing the past (relative to us) every day when we look up to the stars at night. Time knows no absolute simultinaity. Our feet (closer to Earth's gravity) are younger than our heads. The center of the Earth is 2.5 years younger than its' crust.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

...and yes the "Big Other" all-knowing "mind of G_d"... to me is zero point (vacuum) energy in the Dirac Sea... a sea of energy and "potential".... as in the ending of the Lord's prayer... "and Thine is the Kingdom, and the POWER, and Glory, Forever Amen."

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Do you follow her? You do like SciFi writers...

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Dancing with the Universe? Dancing with Many Worlds in Alternate Universes, too? I like to dance with only 1 partner, not EVERY partner... at a "time", anyways. ;)

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

The wave function collapses when your "time" and my (or a "particle of matter's" relative "times" meet (overlap) in an "observation"... at the interface between matter and zero-point energies travelling in waves at the speed of light.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

...at THAT point, the quantum becomes classical.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

...and "time" becomes seemingly absolute (vice relative).

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

The problem with the double slit experiment, IMO, is "time" is different for each observer (emitter-slit barrier-detector all being different observers) (as is the zero point energy field in which each particle has travelled after being fired at different times - times are out-of-phase). "Being" (ontology) is time-instant dependent specific... and over multiple iterations in the same observer, increasingly subjective

Anonymous said...

Don't like to dance with that nasty left leg of your partner? Or that naughty right leg?
Only with that that in-between?
%p

Anonymous said...

Naah
You got nothing of what I said (((

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Don't worry, the wave function doesn't HAVE to collapse. You can hold two contradictory thoughts in suspense at the same time in super-position... as you just indicated and just be open to uncertainty.

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Maybe a little.

As entropy occurs, the physics and appearances of Matter changes (the 'colour' chromodynamics within different field combinations). Like with the recently discovered "heavy proton" w 4x mass at higher energy density levels.

Lazare Carnot was right. For progress (in terms of assembly theory and creating higher assemblies and matter combinations) to occur requires the discovery and exploitation of higher energy densities... your initial "singularity".

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Yep. I pop a boner in too many worlds when close-dancing one at-a-time.. ;(