Shifting from an "Authentically felt" guilt for the holocaust (by actual Nazi's), to an Inauthentic, Profilic and "Performative" guilt (by Descendants of Nazis) and transforming Affirmative-Semitism into the new "Civic Religion" of Germany, German sense of pride in "self".
“There is no such thing as collective guilt or collective innocence; guilt and innocence make sense only if applied to individuals.”–Hannah Arendt, "Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship"
Google AI on The Sociological "Principle of Least Action":
Jacques Ellul (1912–1994) was a French philosopher, sociologist, and theologian who argued that modern society is dominated by a relentless, all-encompassing drive for efficiency, which he termed "technique". In his 1954 masterpiece, The Technological Society, he argued that this drive for efficiency has ceased to be a tool for human improvement and instead has become a self-perpetuating system that subordinates human freedom, values, and ethics to technical necessity.Here are the key components of Ellul's philosophy on efficiency:1. Technique: The Pursuit of "The One Best Way"Definition: Ellul defined technique as the totality of methods rationally arrived at to achieve "absolute efficiency" in every field of human activity.Beyond Machines: Technique is not just machines (like computers or factory tools) but the rationalization of all processes, including, management, education, and entertainment.The "One Best Way": Technique seeks the most efficient, standardized method for every action, eliminating human spontaneity and variation.2. The Betrayal of TechnologyReduced Freedom: While technology is intended to liberate humanity and reduce burden, Ellul argued it actually enslaves humanity by creating dependencies and "artificial needs".Problem-Generating: Ellul famously argued that technological efficiency solves one problem only to create three new ones, forcing humanity into a constant, frantic state of technological adaptation.Reversal of Ends and Means: In a technical society, efficiency is no longer a means to a better life; it becomes an end in itself. Everything is judged by whether it is efficient, not by whether it is good or meaningful.3. The Characteristics of the Technical SystemAutonomy: Technique operates by its own internal logic, ignoring ethical or moral considerations.Totalitarianism: It is inescapable. All human activities—social, economic, and political—are coerced into this technical framework, and those who do not conform are deemed inefficient or "wrong".Automatic Growth: Technical developments proceed automatically. Once a technical solution is available, it is adopted, and it in turn breeds further technological advancements, creating a "closed circle".4. Human Impact and the "New Society"Standardization: Humans are reduced to "mere components" within a larger technical system.Loss of Meaning: The focus on speed and optimization removes the human meaning and tradition behind activities.Illiberalism: Both capitalist and socialist systems are equally driven by this ethos of efficiency, leading to a new type of conformist, technical society.5. Resistance and EthicsCritique of "Stifling Pressure": Ellul, who was a Christian anarchist, urged for an awareness of this pressure to resist it, advocating for a "style of life" that prioritizes human, personal, and spiritual values over technical performance."Non-power": He proposed an "ethics of non-power," encouraging people to reject the lure of total efficiency and control.Key Works:
- The Technological Society (1954)
- Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes (1962)
- The Technological System (1980)
- The Technological Bluff (1990)
Genesis 25: 19-34 (KJV):
19 And these are the generations of Isaac, Abraham's son: Abraham begat Isaac:
20 And Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebekah to wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Padanaram, the sister to Laban the Syrian.
21 And Isaac intreated the Lord for his wife, because she was barren: and the Lord was intreated of him, and Rebekah his wife conceived.
22 And the children struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went to enquire of the Lord.
23 And the Lord said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.
24 And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb.
25 And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.
26 And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau's heel; and his name was called Jacob: and Isaac was threescore years old when she bare them.
27 And the boys grew: and Esau was a cunning hunter, a man of the field; and Jacob was a plain man, dwelling in tents.
28 And Isaac loved Esau, because he did eat of his venison: but Rebekah loved Jacob.
29 And Jacob sod pottage (cooked lentils): and Esau came from the field, and he was faint:
30 And Esau said to Jacob, Feed me, I pray thee, with that same red pottage; for I am faint: therefore was his name called Edom.
31 And Jacob said, Sell me this day thy birthright.
32 And Esau said, Behold, I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me?
33 And Jacob said, Swear to me this day; and he sware unto him: and he sold his birthright unto Jacob.
34 Then Jacob gave Esau bread and pottage of lentiles; and he did eat and drink, and rose up, and went his way: thus Esau despised his birthright.
Either, either.
ReplyDeleteEither you admitting being child of your parents and descendant of all ancestry, in good and in bad.
Or... you bec(me brainless nomad. Entity withour Past, and without Future...
yawn.
From TEKONWATONTI: Poems of War
ReplyDeleteMolly Brant (1735-1795)
If I could scratch figures
I would show you fathers of the 13 Fires
how my many grandfathers struggled
to construct the Longhouse
with two doors and a central fire
which you entered
and took out a lit kindling;
how you took up the wisdom
of our great and wise Peacemaker
as you accepted our corn
caught trout from our rivers,
scalp-hair from our heads.
If you would listen with clean ears,
and I could scratch these sureties
into birch bark or rock
you would remember always
from where your freedoms and liberties
first captured your attention.
May your fire burn,
and allow our fire
to blaze as well...
sign of spirit,
symbol of survival,
our corn fields,
our white pine of peace,
eagle diligently watching
all the skies.
A people who do not remember...
rain which falls upon rock.
--Maurice Kenny
Lentil soup, anyone?
DeleteOr more Deleuze and Guattari Nomadology?
DeleteGoogle AI:
Nomadology is a philosophical concept introduced by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari in A Thousand Plateaus (specifically "Treatise on Nomadology: The War Machine") that defines a way of thinking that resists the structured, sedentary authority of the State. It promotes "smooth" space over "striated" state space, focusing on constant movement, becoming-imperceptible, and creative, anti-conformist thought.
Core Components of Nomadology
The War Machine vs. The State: Deleuze and Guattari argue that the "war machine" is an exterior force—often nomadic—that opposes the rigid, sedentary apparatus of the State. The war machine isn't solely about war; it is a force of creativity and resistance that threatens to disrupt the State's monopoly on space and control.
Smooth Space vs. Striated Space: Nomads occupy "smooth space" (like deserts, steppes, or oceans), which is open, boundless, and constantly shifting. In contrast, the State imposes "striated space" (like urban grids or agricultural plots), which is mapped, enclosed, and tightly regulated.
Nomadic Thought: This approach encourages thinking that is not pinned down by traditional intellectual frameworks. It operates through "lines of flight" or escaping conventional constraints, constantly creating new ways of being.
"Becoming-Imperceptible": A key ethical aim is to resist being defined or trapped by power structures by constantly transforming and adapting, moving beyond the binary constraints of society.
Modern Interpretations and Context
Postmodern Nomadism: Some interpretations extend this to a, where "nomads" represent a cosmopolitan elite using technology (laptops, phones) to operate outside conventional institutional constraints.
Psychical Nomadism: Hakim Bey expanded on this, describing it as a technique of adopting useful parts of various systems while discarding others, creating "Temporary Autonomous Zones".
The Nomadology Business: "The Nomadology" is also a real-world organization based in Michigan that organizes backpacking trips for women.
Nomadology: The War Machine is often read as a "speedy, pocket-sized treatise" intended to be utilized while in transit, opposing fixed hierarchies.
Meden agan!
Jackals and Arabs!
ReplyDeleteYeah.
ReplyDeleteYou are ready, and even desiring... war.
And it seems all world too...
Yawn.
//Illiberalism: Both capitalist and socialist systems are equally driven by this ethos of efficiency
ReplyDeleteYawn
He just dunno what he babbling.
Au contraire. The world is ALL about "aggregate efficiencies". Efficiency = fragility... intelligence is anti-fragile!
Delete"Intelligence is a fixed goal with variable means of achieving it" - William James ... against the "one way".
State Control and Authoritarianism are the direct result of seeking (aggregating) efficiencies. Redundancy (inefficient) creates "surplus capacity" (inefficient... until the goals change). Like unused, but avativistic, genes in our DNA.
DeleteNASA redundancy policy... Google AI:
DeleteNASA redundancy requirements are dictated by mission risk classification (Class A-D) and safety, with human-rated systems aiming for zero single-point failures. High-priority missions (Class A/B) require extensive hot/warm redundancy to eliminate single-point failures, whereas lower-cost, experimental missions (Class C/D) may accept higher risks, fewer backups, and greater reliance on single-string components.
Redundancy by Mission Risk Class (NPR 8705.4)
NASA classifies missions to determine the appropriate rigor for safety and reliability:
Class A (Lowest Risk): National assets, crewed missions. Extremely low risk tolerance, requiring full redundancy for all critical systems, ensuring no single failure compromises the mission.
Class B (Low Risk): High-priority missions with minor compromises in standards.
Class C (Moderate Risk): Exploratory/experimental missions where critical functions are redundant, but other systems may be single-string.
Class D (Highest Risk): Short-duration, experimental missions where "do no harm" (to others) is the primary requirement. High risk of total loss is acceptable, with minimal redundancy and, often, single-string design.
Key Requirements and Approaches
Human-Rating (NPR 8705.2B): Crew safety requires that no single failure—and in some cases, no two failures (two-fault tolerance)—endangers the crew.
Hot vs. Cold Redundancy: Critical systems (avionics, life support) often use "hot" redundancy (systems running simultaneously) to enable instant switchover.
Fault Tolerance: Systems are designed for "fail-safe" or "fail-operational," meaning they can lose one component and still function (1-fault tolerant) or lose two and still function (2-fault tolerant).
Dissimilar Redundancy: To prevent common cause failures (where the same flaw breaks all redundant systems), NASA often requires different hardware or software for redundant paths.
Redundancy Mitigation: In cases where redundancy is not possible, risks are mitigated by high-reliability parts, additional testing, and intensive safety analysis.
//State Control and Authoritarianism are the direct result of seeking (aggregating) efficiencies.
ReplyDeleteBoooooS...
That is just "those who know better" want you to think -- that what they doing is not seeking for personal gains but "for the sake of efficiency". ;-p
Why they eradicated VERY NOTION of Cybernetics -- science that could attaun top efficiency in every indeavor?
What about theory of optimisation from math?
How about rational decision-making?
They didn't need to do that. They built the entertainment industry to keep people distracted, from pursuing their own business endeavors in their "free" time. Leisure was a distraction. Save you energy for your work day tomorrow...
Delete//Au contraire. The world is ALL about "aggregate efficiencies".
ReplyDeleteNaaah.
World about scarcity.
That makes even biggest plunderers to think twice -- is there enough resources???
How do you overcome scarcity? With greater efficiency and productivity. Increased crop yields. After the Nile floods, scatter seeds on the banks, and drive the cattle over the seeds before the birds come, to bury the seeds. ;)
DeleteNew Technics are born from the quest for efficiencies.
DeleteSpintronics instead of electronics. (Power efficiencies).
Delete//How do you overcome scarcity?
ReplyDeleteYawn. Evolution(tm)