Wednesday, February 22, 2023

Michel Foucault - Beyond Good & Evil

104 comments:

  1. China+RFia == New Axis. Now officially.

    Or what??? Do you STILL thinking that that is NOT about USA???

    That is NOT Cold War 2.0, with blazing perspectives to became Hot.

    That there are NO shiny big target with bleeding bullseye on your back.

    At which ALL existing ICBMs (that is not yours) aiming.

    That that is NOT serious.

    And that YOU/USA do not need all and any possble allies.

    And all and any possible ideas and minds, who want and ready to help you.

    That that damn clocks of Kairos, not ticking... tick-tock, tick-tock.
    And that is MUCH MORE dangerous... that clock, than that knife.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think that our Pentagon Planners have gotten ahead of themselves. And if I were China, I'd sell Russia all the lethal aid could handle, since America is already doing that for Taiwan.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Do you know what Spiral of Escalation mean?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Or more like Slippery Slope of Appeasing of Agressor. ;-P

    Well, you after war Pentagon KNEW that damn well.

    And deed all needed. Like operation Crome Dome. ;-)

    And it WORKED!!! Like that charm.

    ReplyDelete
  5. That's what RFia tryed to achieve with conquest of UA.
    Isn't it obvious?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think you missed the point. That was a term used to describe the Cold War. The Cold War is Over.

    ReplyDelete
  7. \\I think you missed the point. That was a term used to describe the Cold War. The Cold War is Over.

    You really have NO experience of street brawls.
    No.
    It is not end... till someone die.
    And even that, it only mean that someone another will be a new target.


    \\That you provoked a hot war is NMP.

    What the problem?
    Go givup Ukraine to RFia.
    Then Taiwan to China.
    ...
    Then Europe to New Russian Empire.
    And Pacific to New Chinese Empire.
    ...
    Then go crawl back into your cave, and die here quitly.


    Life it's a Fight.
    That because of a joke of Evolution that you are living in a time/zone with a mild environment. Closed from outer disastres and dangers.

    But.

    Such environments never lasts for too long.
    And those who grown accustomed to such envo... tend to go extinct.

    As that dodos.
    Do you want to be like dodo? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  8. A large group of Russian soldiers on the outskirts of the village is moving along the road, when suddenly a voice is heard behind a small hill: "One Ukrainian soldier is better than 10 Russians!" The Russian commander orders his best 10 fighters to go behind this hill, where a firefight begins, lasts for several minutes, and silence ensues. A voice is heard again: "One Ukrainian soldier is better than 100 Russians!". The Russian commander furiously sends 100 more of his best soldiers. Shooting again, after 10 minutes of silence. A calm Ukrainian exclaims again: "One Ukrainian is better than 1,000 Russian soldiers!" The Russian commander in a frenzy sends 1,000 of his soldiers over the hill. You can hear the sounds of battle, grenades, shooting. Silence. In the end, one seriously wounded Russian man crawls out from behind the hill and pleads with his dying commander: “Don't send anyone else there. This is a trap. There are two of them...

    ReplyDelete
  9. :-)


    Just for clarity.

    You keep using such missives, like: "That you provoked a hot war is NMP"

    That make it look like you think that you are talking with Zelensky... who for somereason decided to come as anon in your blog. ;-P

    Well, even Zelensky is not one who "provoked a hot war". He is the same victim as anybpdy else in whole world.
    That was Putin's desire to have "little victorious war"... to help to patch up his leaking internal politics.
    Him and him alone started it. And him and him alone ARE ONE who can stop it anytime, still.

    So, maybe you think that this losy miserly anon -- is a Putin itself??? :-)))))

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ukraine shelled no one in the Donbass before 2/24/22? Who knew?

    ReplyDelete
  11. And you throwed A-bomb... TWO of em, at absolutely peaceful women and children, of Japan.

    Do you really like SUCH level of "discussion"? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  12. \\Ukraine shelled no one in the Donbass before 2/24/22? Who knew?

    Well.
    Russian Propaganda.
    From 2014 and till today. Each day. Day to day. Keep claiming that "Ukraine Bombing Donbass". "For 8 years."
    Well, you can check it yourself -- just open Google Maps and go through that region, and in different periods of time. While keeping the map with frontline in mind.
    That should be TOO DAMN OBVIOUS -- from which side WHAT destruction levels are.

    And in the last year. They keep telling that "nasty Ukrainians" dropping 5-6 precious, hard earned 155 mm rounds... at some random places of Donetsk city.

    FOR WHAT??? What military reason could be dewised to explain it?

    Well... Russian Propaganda saying that that is to keep "people of Donbass" scared... but, WHO exactly have reasons to scary "people of Donbass" that way? What is YOUR opinion?

    ReplyDelete
  13. The OSCE monitored the shelling on each side. Just go to their website and look at the maps. Most of the explosions seem to have been on the breakaway republic side (meaning they were shelled by the Ukrainians).

    Here look for yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Are you implying that the OSCE publishes Russian propaganda?

    ReplyDelete
  15. \\(meaning they were shelled by the Ukrainians).

    Really? :-)))

    Do you mean that occupant and agressor COULD not fire at own side... if he want to provoce a war.
    As Hitler did, as Stalion did.

    In Donetsk region, between the evenings of 18 and 20 February, the SMM recorded 2,158
    ceasefire violations, including 1,100 explosions (144 outgoing, 19 airbursts, 37 impacts and
    900 undetermined).


    Please, explain to me. What that "outgoing" means???
    Maybe I am unproficient enough in English language.
    Do not understand meaning of words.
    And "outgoing" means "nasty-nasty-wrong Ukrainans firing mega-tons at peaceful-fluffy-sweet agg... ah, such an innocent invaders"??? :-)))


    And how'd you coment THIS paragraph:
    "*Restrictions of the SMM’s freedom of movement or other impediments to fulfilment of
    its mandate
    The SMM’s monitoring and freedom of movement are restricted by security hazards and threats,
    including risks posed by mines, unexploded ordnance (UXO) and other impediments – which vary
    from day to day. The SMM’s mandate provides for safe and secure access throughout Ukraine. All
    signatories of the Minsk agreements have agreed on the need for this safe and secure access, that
    restriction of the SMM’s freedom of movement constitutes a violation, and on the need for rapid
    response to these violations. They have also agreed that the Joint Centre for Control and Coordination
    (JCCC) should contribute to such response and co-ordinate mine clearance. Nonetheless,
    the armed formations in parts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions frequently deny the SMM access to
    areas adjacent to Ukraine’s border outside control of the government (for example, see below). The
    SMM’s operations in Donetsk and Luhansk regions remain restricted following the fatal incident of
    23 April 2017 near Pryshyb; these restrictions continued to limit the Mission’s observations.
    "



    Or tables:
    Table of weapons
    Weapons in violation of withdrawal lines


    Or individual entryes in that table, like:
    Near Kreminets (nongovernment-controlled,16km SW of Donetsk)
    2km NW Heard 11 Explosion Outgoing Artillery(type N/K) 20-Feb, 09:55-10:02
    15km W Heard 11 Explosion Impact Artillery(type N/K) 20-Feb, 09:55-10:02


    Kadiivka (formerly Stakhanov,non-government-controlled,50km W of Luhansk)
    4-5km WSW Heard 5 Explosion Outgoing Artillery(type N/K) 19-Feb, 19:22-19:45
    13-16km W Heard 4 Explosion Impact Artillery(type N/K) 19-Feb, 19:22-19:45

    ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  16. You are under influance of Putin's Propaganda narrative.

    That's why you cannot discern facts (like that, that that OSCE reported "explosions" -- they NOT mean "Ukrainians fired to"... proper hits they call "impacts" or even "craters"... only when they allowed to come closer... while THAT/Russian side allow em to do rarely) from dust and fumes of propaganda.

    ReplyDelete
  17. There are two sides to every war. You didn't have to give an excuse to invade, but you couldn't help yourselves. You had NATO and American friends.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Clearly NOT european POV.


    \\You didn't have to give an excuse to invade, but you couldn't help yourselves.

    Me? I'm not Putin. :-)))

    ReplyDelete
  19. I hate to tell you this, but American Support for Ukraine is fading fast... you may have the American elites on board, but the regular/ working people aren't buying it.

    ReplyDelete
  20. You keep saying that... without giving much meat, for me to dent my teeth in it.

    Maybe you even believe it is true.
    Contre-factually.
    While all evidances, and historical, and pragmatical, and emotional -- screaming about it -- that destinies of UA and UsA -- is bound. ;-P
    With Gordi's Knot weaved by Kairos. ;-P

    Well, you can try to cut it through... but Kairos... he'd be furious. And will use hat his knife... to cut something very important (well, for a man, meh) from you.

    ReplyDelete
  21. So what???

    Remind me. What was polls regarding Entering into WW2?

    That is what shiny bright "leadership" is for. And you, USA, are most proficient with it. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'm sure that you meant to say "inept at it" (leadership). People don't like to get blindsided and dragged into wars with nuclear armed opponents. Call us "fickle" that way.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Still... of all your leaders ONLY Kennedy was ept in such sense.

    And you know youself what happened with him.

    So. Long life to the Reigan('s spirit of leadership of USA) ;-P

    Well, Ok, I will brag for some more, about MY knowledge of USA history. ;-P

    PLUS Eizenhour, PLUS Nixon. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  24. Sorry, Eisenhover.

    No... that was Truman, I forgot. But well, if I recall correctly Ike was good at it too?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Kennedy was dragged into the Bay of Pigs. Johnson, into Vietnam. Kennedy told the Deep State to 'F off.

    ReplyDelete
  26. The Art of War by Sun Tzu - The Internet Classics Archive
    classics.mit.edu › Tzu › artwar
    Sun Tzu said: The art of war is of vital importance to the State. 2. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Science... it's most noble of all arts. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  28. Especially... as ordinary art -- can only mirror, what already exist.

    While science can create NEW realms. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  29. That is not science that created it...

    But same, pragmaticly speaking, isn't that is EXACTLY A-bomb... saved us from Third Instantiation of Worldwide Homicide???

    Would people *stop* wars, without such a strong incentive?

    ReplyDelete
  30. So??? ww3-4-5-6 with ever increasing deadliness of weapon are better?
    Gradually.
    Instead of Big Bomb given "too early"???

    Hmmm...

    ReplyDelete
  31. Ehm??? What that even mean? What "efficiency" metric do you propose to use?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Oh... that Americans. And their belief in $$$.

    ReplyDelete
  33. How do you like it?

    https://www.stripes.com/theaters/europe/2022-03-05/us-allies-quietly-prepare-ukrainian-government-exile-long-insurgency-5238438.html

    ReplyDelete
  34. "Russia has more troops than Ukraine," said a second senior European diplomat. "Ukrainian troops are very brave, but they are already fighting more than a week."

    So... yes, go tell me. About "efficiency". :-)))

    ReplyDelete
  35. The Russians must not be using big enough bombs...

    ReplyDelete
  36. Hah???

    Huge... XXXXXXXL That is ONLY size they know and respect.

    ReplyDelete
  37. \\The Russians must not be using big enough bombs...

    And... wadayatlk???

    They used FAB3000 -- 3 ton of f*cking TNT.

    Mariupol hospital airstrike - Wikipedia
    en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mariupol_hospital_airstrike

    ReplyDelete
  38. And using USA-Carrier-Killer X-22 rockets with nearly 1 ton warheads.
    To destroy hausing.

    What "bigger bombs" do you mean???

    A-bombs?

    Do you REALLY want it to became "business as usual"? Using of A-bombs over cities???

    Because you think that it NEVER will be your USA cities?????!!!

    ReplyDelete
  39. There even no word "efficiency" in my posts.

    And above I properly asked YOU about it.

    There is Russian saying "asking question in response to a question do only Jews?" ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  40. Question was NOT about tacti and strategy of wars, isn't it?
    But about moral jusdgment, true?

    ReplyDelete
  41. War is the practice of immorality... of trying to impose your will upon others.

    "War is cruelty. There is no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over."

    -William Tecumseh Sherman


    "If the people raise a great howl against my barbarity and cruelty, I will answer that war is war, and not popularity seeking."

    -William Tecumseh Sherman


    "This war differs from other wars, in this particular. We are not fighting armies but a hostile people, and must make old and young, rich and poor, feel the hard hand of war."

    -William Tecumseh Sherman

    "My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom."

    -William Tecumseh Sherman

    ReplyDelete
  42. "Every attempt to make war easy and safe will result in humiliation and disaster."

    -William Tecumseh Sherman

    ReplyDelete
  43. Fear is the beginning of wisdom, as Sherman said. the Russians need bigger bombs.

    ReplyDelete
  44. \\War is the practice of immorality... of trying to impose your will upon others.

    If there is wars... how Moral can be, anywhere around???

    Or... that Moral patched up to allow wars?
    What a Moral that is, that way?



    \\Fear is the beginning of wisdom, as Sherman said. the Russians need bigger bombs.

    Ehm???
    Do you still inclined to cheer for Russian?
    What for?

    ReplyDelete
  45. War is immoral. "Just War Theory" is a theory that tells you when you should stop being moral.. a rule for breaking the rules.

    I don't cheer for Russia. I simply state the kindest thing that can happen, Russia does something so shocking and so damaging to Ukraine that they surrender. Less Ukrainians will die that way. My sentiment is the equivalent of shooting my horse to save it from un-necessary and prolonged pain, in the long run. Ukraine cannot win w/o dragging the US/NATO into the war. And the US military is too stupid to win WWIII. It will result in a nuclear catastophe for the world.

    ReplyDelete
  46. \\War is immoral. "Just War Theory" is a theory that tells you when you should stop being moral.. a rule for breaking the rules.

    Yep. "All of the time".
    As being opportunists is the best tactic. ALWAYS.
    At least, it would be, if there'd be no people with memory.
    And severe(?) punishment for lyars and trespassers.


    \\I don't cheer for Russia. I simply state the kindest thing that can happen, Russia does something so shocking and so damaging to Ukraine that they surrender. Less Ukrainians will die that way.

    Utter bullshit.
    Was it working? Ever???

    There is no free lunch
    Means there is no simple easy to understand and perform CORRECT solutions. ;-P


    \\ Ukraine cannot win w/o dragging the US/NATO into the war.

    That is not Ukraine who dragged anyone into it's war -- that is NATO(and U.S.A.) are one who postopned it's duty.

    Uvalde Syndrome, remember?


    I stated it the first time I came here, isn't it?
    Just WHAT would happen, IF russians attack on Ukraine would be "in accordance with plan -- three days and in Kiev"???

    NATO would be THE NEXT target.
    First Balitic countries.
    Some rebels and separatists would come into Latuia, Lithuania and Estonia... across Belorus border... and from Kaliningrad/Kenigsberg.
    What your, USA response would be? But we know it, yes?
    Then.
    All around Europe politicans killing and riots would start.
    With entering of all kinds of "saviors of nation", ready to give keys to all towns.
    What your, USA response would be? But we know it, yes?
    Then.
    Same would be tryed on your turf. In your heartland.
    And there'd be lots of that who would glad to say "Hail, Putin" the same as there WAS many of that who was saying "Hail, Hitler".

    Philip Dick, "Man in High Castle"... if I recall it correctly.

    Only instead of Germans and Japanese.
    That would be Russians and Chinese.

    And that path still not closed.

    ReplyDelete
  47. And Davy Krocket Nuke in a basment? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  48. And Davy Krocket Nuke in a basment? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  49. Forgive me my sneakiness, but can you explain to this dumb foreigner, how that "molon labe" worked in relation to 9/11 event?

    ReplyDelete
  50. \\Ask OBL... if you can find the pieces.

    Pooft. Like he was final beneficiar. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  51. It was his plan... attract foreign fighters to jihad to unify the ummah... lure the "Far Satan" near, and use it to train his forces... all 2nd sons w/o inheritance who needed land and war brides to make Islam great again.

    It was a good plan.

    ReplyDelete
  52. W/O OBL's leadership and vision, few could replace him. ISIS tried, but they we're mostly jihadi's looking for a mahdi to lead them.

    ReplyDelete
  53. They lacked OBL's experience from Pakistan/Afghanistan defeating the Soviets/Russians.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Islam is the ultimate religion/ideology for war/ foreign conquest. It never needed Khomeini's "poor man's atomic bomb".

    ReplyDelete
  55. OBL's was a "strategic" vision. There's were merely "tactical" ones.

    ReplyDelete
  56. \\It was his plan... attract foreign fighters to jihad to unify the ummah... lure the "Far Satan" near, and use it to train his forces...

    And who gave him money for all that?
    Who supported and helped to hide?
    And who betrayed him in the end?

    No... Machiavelli was wasted on you.


    And.
    It's impossible to build anything lasting... only on the base of endless(sic) conquest.



    ReplyDelete
  57. Just as the Saudi's relied upon "foreign fighters" so would OBL. Only his would be ideologically "pure", not foreign scum.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Not, as Machiavelli would disdain, foreign "mercenaries"... but men with a self-interest of money... but land... wives/brides. Something that made them more amenable to "control".

    ReplyDelete
  59. \\Money? The bin Laden family ALWAYS had money.

    Money is just a worthless pieces of paper.
    Or even ethereal numbers on bank accounts.

    One need to have RIGHT, and possibility to spend em too.

    You Captain Obvious.

    But for you, as proud USAian, that could be an kbscure wisdom, yes?


    \\...dreams of a life worth living.

    Yep.
    Dreams... is the best product to trade. If one able to find/attract customers. ;-)
    Cheap in production. Enormous in price. Never ending in supply. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  60. ...as PT Barnum would say, "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the public" and "there's a sucker born every minute."

    ReplyDelete
  61. One need to have RIGHT, and possibility to spend em too.

    That's why Putin keeps his money in Swiss banks...

    ReplyDelete
  62. Ha-ha... and what he can buy with em? :-)))

    ReplyDelete
  63. ...all he needs to do is run it through a couple of shell corporations in the Bahamas first. Ask the City of London Corporation for help washing it.

    ReplyDelete
  64. This is why the USIC wants to implement eDollars. Control the money, control the world.

    ReplyDelete
  65. There are bills in 20 US States today that would make bitcoin illegal, and Central Bank Digital Currencies the ONLY legal tender.

    ReplyDelete
  66. You really should study the "liberal arts"... or you'll end up a slave in no time. :(

    ReplyDelete
  67. And UDP protocol of the Internet to boot? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  68. All of the control in a "society of control" is in the protocol. It either lets you "in" or keeps you "out".

    ReplyDelete
  69. ...and keeps you chasing achievement until you "Bartleby"....

    "I would prefer NOT to."

    ReplyDelete
  70. How it'll be "worker unions" in Kantonise? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  71. What is UDP | From Header Structure to Packets Used in DDoS ...
    www.imperva.com › Home › DDoS
    User datagram protocol (UDP) operates on top of the Internet Protocol (IP) to transmit datagrams over a network. UDP does not require the source and destination ... ;-P


    Go track me, be my guest protocol. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  72. I tryed to groke it. Really.

    But, you know, it's like wirlwind in the trees for me. :-/

    ReplyDelete
  73. He wrote a poem once... I can't find it... in which his companion asks why he doesn't sign his works/ poems. He didn't need to, because his works and words alone spoke as to his identity.... one doesn't need to "trace" them to recognize him in them.

    ReplyDelete
  74. For that... one need to be *native* to that particular culture. :-(

    ReplyDelete