Thursday, June 27, 2024

Entropy = Increasing Disorder? Think Again... Contextually Dependent Entropy?

from Wiki:

Order and disorder[edit]

Entropy is often loosely associated with the amount of order or disorder, or of chaos, in a thermodynamic system. The traditional qualitative description of entropy is that it refers to changes in the state of the system and is a measure of "molecular disorder" and the amount of wasted energy in a dynamical energy transformation from one state or form to another. In this direction, several recent authors have derived exact entropy formulas to account for and measure disorder and order in atomic and molecular assemblies.[62][63][64] One of the simpler entropy order/disorder formulas is that derived in 1984 by thermodynamic physicist Peter Landsberg, based on a combination of thermodynamics and information theory arguments. He argues that when constraints operate on a system, such that it is prevented from entering one or more of its possible or permitted states, as contrasted with its forbidden states, the measure of the total amount of "disorder" in the system is given by:[63][64]

Disorder =  Cd/Ci

Similarly, the total amount of "order" in the system is given by

:Order = 1 - Co/Ci

In which CD is the "disorder" capacity of the system, which is the entropy of the parts contained in the permitted ensemble, CI is the "information" capacity of the system, an expression similar to Shannon's channel capacity, and CO is the "order" capacity of the system.[62]

235 comments:

  1. Distinction without differences.

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well... Shannon's "information quantity" is questionable too. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  3. Watched debates... err, just read transcript. ;-P

    And then just skimmed video.

    What can I say -- all the same boring thing.

    dRump looks more powerful -- because of reversal. in 2020 he was acting POTUS and Mister 33%(I think that is proper name of it, from now no) was challenger -- means, could only attack, while dRump needed to try to protect oneself, of which he not very proficient.

    And now it reversed... and Bi... Mister 33% could not find what to answer -- apart from spinning same DEMN lies and propaganda.

    So boring. :-/

    ReplyDelete
  4. \\BIDEN: We are the most admired country in the world. We’re the United States of America. There’s nothing beyond our capacity. We have the finest military in the history of the world. The finest in the history of the world. No one thinks we’re weak. No one wants to screw around with us. Nobody. Number one.

    Yeah.

    That's why liliPut disregards you and collude with Iran and NK.

    And China speeding up to achieve M.A.D. levels.

    What a dope.

    Well... he DO NOT plan to live for that long -- to see and live through all that disasters that he planted numerous seeds... :-((((

    ReplyDelete
  5. \\ BIDEN: Look, the fact of the matter is that he’s dead wrong about it. He’s increased the tariff – he’s increased – he will increase the taxes on middle class people. I said I’d never raise a tax on anybody making less than $400,000. I didn’t.

    Flat out lie.

    That is INDIRECT taxes, that make lower wages people impoverish.

    Taxes... like, inflation.

    Or... high taxes on corporations, that make em unable to pay big wages, or even go abroad with their businesses -- there, where taxes are LOWER, and where wages are infinitely less.






    ReplyDelete
  6. Something... Mister 33% never got to read... it seems -- https://www.econlib.org/library/Essays/hykKnw.html

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I watched about ten minutes of it. Same-old Same-o.

    You won't see Biden for another week. He's spent, and needs time to recover from the drugs.

    ReplyDelete
  8. CNN gave transcript.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I saved it... for future reading.

    And I bet -- it will be DEMN-splained, a lot (if not already... I saw they have runned *4* hours preliminaries -- to prepare people, how they need to look at it... and that 33% -- that is ones who was throught that preliminaries) ;-p

    ReplyDelete
  10. The visuals will matter much more than any words spoken by the candidates. The words will only matter to those more scientifically motivated viewers wishing to calculate the entropy remainders in Joe Biden's brain.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well... I tried to read something from their wrinkled faces... but, language and cultural barriers be damned. ;-P

    And... I doubt it matter, this time.

    They both based their screeds on propaganda -- same DEMN-propaganda.

    Which Bi-den cited... endlessly.

    While dRump tried to perform judo move over...

    ReplyDelete
  12. They will be spreading this


    Like this.

    Linda Qiu

    Linda Qiu
    Fact-check Reporter
    “He wants to raise your taxes by four times.”

    — Former President Donald J. Trump
    False.

    Like it NOT Bi-den that bragged that he'd like to rob "those nasty burguios" for 500 billion. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  13. Or this.


    Linda Qiu

    Linda Qiu
    Fact-check Reporter
    “Nancy Pelosi, if you just watched the news from two days ago on tape to her daughter who’s a documentary filmmaker, or they say what she’s saying, ‘Oh, no, it’s my responsibility. I was responsible for this.’ Because I offered them 10,000 soldiers are National Guard. And she turned them down.”

    — Former President Donald J. Trump
    This is misleading.

    Mr. Trump is distorting what Representative Nancy Pelosi, then the House speaker, said. Ms. Pelosi did not admit to turning down National Guard troops. She does not have such authority.



    PS DEMN-Truth. Yawn.

    Now, after so many time spent with Derpy, I see it clearly.

    Just an "innocent" skewing of perception.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The country began this journey with giving Democrats the "benefit of the doubt". Last night demonstrated to many the perils of doing so to an unscrupulous overly-produced and so overly "self-interested" elite.

    ReplyDelete
  15. What is that word, to call a person that in respect to itself always self-excusing, and to others -- only full throttle blaming?

    Fool? Hypocrite?

    Well... that is definitely femalish behavior, isn't it? (or... there is cultural difference) "I am girl, therefore I am free and protected from: violence, need to carry big weights, do hard job in general and bore my mind with understanding all such manly-boring techy things".

    ReplyDelete
  16. What is intelligence? It's entropy, creating order from disorder. 'ordered' fractals from chaos.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Like the shaked cubes in the jar... a localized closed system.

    ReplyDelete
  18. ...and biologically stored and now infinitely 'alterable'. in patterned electric fields? Entropy.

    ReplyDelete
  19. A "generation from opposites" ala Hesiod's "Theogeny".

    ReplyDelete
  20. \\What is intelligence? It's entropy, creating order from disorder. 'ordered' fractals from chaos.

    You going too far, too fast.

    What is Information? ;-)




    \\...the self aligning nails in the plastic case,

    Yep... if someone would shake it, properly.




    \\...matter into information.

    Is it? ;-)




    \\A "generation from opposites" ala Hesiod's "Theogeny".

    Wisdoms of the past...




    \\Earth is a 'naturally formed' von Neumann probe.

    Is it?

    What is "natural" and what "non-natural" then? ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  21. Natural. A process or result of a process NOT influenced by man.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Entropy is a process of turning matter into information.

    Entropy is central to the second law of thermodynamics, which states that the entropy of an isolated system left to spontaneous evolution cannot decrease with time. As a result, isolated systems evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium, where the entropy is highest. A consequence of the second law of thermodynamics is that certain processes are irreversible.

    ReplyDelete
  23. \\Natural. A process or result of a process NOT influenced by man.

    Ahh-hah... you already forgot.

    That quip from Lem's text.

    Let's assume that we are secret agents... and we established VERY SECRET channel of information -- through urinal. If needed, I'll be swallowing something with lots of sugar, and you'd be tasting my piss.

    Will sugar in my piss be "natural"? Or "artifical"? ;-)




    \\Entropy is a process of turning matter into information.

    Can elaborate DETAILS of that process? ;-)




    \\Entropy is central to the second law of thermodynamics, which states that the entropy of an isolated system left to spontaneous evolution cannot decrease with time.

    Well... that's just a postulate.

    postulate
    noun: postulate; plural noun: postulates
    /ˈpɒstjʊlət/

    a thing suggested or assumed as true as the basis for reasoning, discussion, or belief.

    We -- freakingly DUNNO, to what extent and under what circumstances it right.




    \\As a result, isolated systems evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium, where the entropy is highest.

    One little problem.

    We do not know EVEN ONE system which is utterly and completely isolated. ;-P

    And... we know about vacuum foam. ;-)


    Quantum foam
    Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Quantum_foam
    The vacuum fluctuations provide vacuum with a non-zero energy known as vacuum energy. Spin foam theory is a modern attempt to make Wheeler's idea quantitative.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Have you checked out that link -- https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/06/27/us/biden-trump-debate-fact-check

    All that "misleading", "exaggerated". ;-P

    Hilarious.

    And later (people like DiBi) will be hawling "did you see FactCheck cites -- they REVEALED ALL dRump's LIES!!!!!!! HOW CAN'T YOU SEE IT!!!! *YOU* *MIGHT* *BE* ***INSANE***!!!!!!!!%$^%@#$$"

    ReplyDelete
  25. Will sugar in my piss be "natural"? Or "artifical"? ;-)

    It would be "UNnatural." ;p

    As the Greeks say, "Know thy self!"

    ReplyDelete
  26. \\It would be "UNnatural." ;p

    Really?

    And you know OBJECTIVE test to prove it? ;-P

    Again -- we are secret agents -- NOBODY apart as two will know about it.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Such a claim is nowhere better than a claim -- "I know Sun shining at me... because there is god Ra... and he benevolent toward me" -- which makes Sun "UNnatural" too. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  28. Sure. It's a LOGIC test. Either YOU know it. Or I know it. THAT doesn't mean we BOTH know it. Happy drinking!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Your model is based upon successful "communication". Mine is not.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Information can be seen as data that has been organized or processed in a way that adds context or meaning. It's raw facts and figures that have been structured but not yet interpreted or fully understood.

    ReplyDelete
  31. btw - I think I'll run your pee through a distiller and mass spectrometer at my end before drinking. What you do at your end is your business.

    ReplyDelete
  32. \\Sure. It's a LOGIC test. Either YOU know it. Or I know it. THAT doesn't mean we BOTH know it. Happy drinking!

    Ehm???

    And from where that "drinking", here?



    \\Your model is based upon successful "communication". Mine is not.

    That's squints.

    Relativistic intelligence, WTF??? ;-)




    \\They leave each other "pee-mails".

    But "natural"... not "UNnatural".

    Fingerprints -- not images on a cave wall. ;-)




    \\Information can be seen as data that has been organized or processed in a way that adds context or meaning. It's raw facts and figures that have been structured but not yet interpreted or fully understood.

    Yeah.

    That's the problem with SUCH definition of information.

    It needs Point of Origin.

    And somebody Conscious and Intelligent need to be in that point.

    As Initial Messenger.(one who created all that mess ;-P)




    \\btw - I think I'll run your pee through a distiller and mass spectrometer at my end before drinking. What you do at your end is your business.

    Yep. That'll be "UNnatural" way.

    Or... gave it to leak to some dog -- and watch at its face. :-))))

    ReplyDelete
  33. at pShaw's



    Convicted criminal? So... when we'd see him in jail?

    You know, that is where "convicted criminals" reside.

    But... he going on debates, with Biden... who should be responsible for PUTTiNG him in jail.

    Isn't it hilarious?

    ReplyDelete
  34. BTW... watched Maverick... what a damn feirytale... turned to eleven. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  35. That's the same Cold War thinking that drew Ukrainians into a war with Russia.

    ReplyDelete
  36. It needs Point of Origin.
    And somebody Conscious and Intelligent need to be in that point.
    As Initial Messenger.(one who created all that mess ;-P)


    No, like an element in the periodic table, it merely has to present space for a single electron to park itself from another molecule and be anchored by the protons clustered in its' nucleus.

    ReplyDelete
  37. \\That's the same Cold War thinking that drew Ukrainians into a war with Russia.

    Not Russia (and to big extent USA gerontocracy) insanity -- desire to turn clocks back into 80th, and re-try??? %-))))) What was NOT tried that time.(by Tim clany script, for example)




    \\No, like an element in the periodic table, it merely has to present space for a single electron to park itself from another molecule and be anchored by the protons clustered in its' nucleus.

    I was talking about Shannon's definition of what information is.

    It based on postulated "channel of information" and operates within attributes of it.

    You are correct -- that behavior of atoms and electrons -- it's also information.

    But... do we have theory of it? ;-)







    ReplyDelete
  38. Perhap's Shannon's is more a "communication theory". That's the problem I have with AI. It's superficially a "communications" solution, not an assembly theory based curation of information. It's based on a theory of rehashing that (partially) with all the garbage human communications surrounding it.

    ReplyDelete
  39. How's it supposed to reach a higher level of "intelligence"? It's like the jar of dice before the jar is spun.

    ReplyDelete
  40. ...you don't get any "understanding" of the intelligence in the output, simply a re-pouring of dice into the beaker.

    ReplyDelete
  41. \\I think we do. It's called "entropy".

    Bleh.

    It's statistics hell. ;-P




    \\Perhap's Shannon's is more a "communication theory".

    Well... it's easy to see -- that he did not planned any extended use of it.

    Only immediate practical use.

    But... now we trying to use it for EVERYTHING (like about "information entropy" in Black Holes) %-))))))))))))))))))))



    \\That's the problem I have with AI.

    Can you elaborate, please?




    \\not an assembly theory based curation of information.

    That assembly theory is BS too.

    Yawn.




    \\How's it supposed to reach a higher level of "intelligence"?

    Is there any such "higher levels" even exist???

    One who are rational and science-knowing -- must ask oneself -- we know that Evolution create all kinds of random beats.

    And it crated many billions of humans.

    Why then we DO NOT see such a "higher level" intellectual prodigies? ;-P

    Something... do not add ups.


    ReplyDelete
  42. \\...you don't get any "understanding" of the intelligence in the output, simply a re-pouring of dice into the beaker.

    ???

    ReplyDelete
  43. About AI.

    Science -- is pretty useless without experimental data. And we, freakingly cannot run such tests on humans (like with dissecting em in the end, like we do with lab mice)

    And not because of any moral limitations -- it's just impractical.

    So... here comes idea of "versatile soft-bodied robots" -- two birds with one stone -- experiments in AI... AND, technology that could create such wonders as probe to other stars... eventually. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  44. :-))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  45. Trying new identity at pShaw's

    Yare-yare

    Very simple Dave Miller -- Chinese trading in Dollars. Period.

    ReplyDelete
  46. at DiDi's


    \\Mr Trump, if after this debate, Mr Biden ordered his secret service to kill you, do you believe he should be prosecuted, or should he as president have the absolute immunity you have argued for before the SCOTUS and walk away a free man?

    Was Obama persecuted, or need to be? For killing bin Laden???




    \\ Blogger Dave Dubya said...

    \\ Thanks to Anonymous for the NY Times fact check link:

    \\ https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/06/27/us/biden-trump-debate-fact-check

    Yeah.

    Now you confirmed that you are fly -- you like shit. :-))))))))))))))))))

    I gave that link as demonstration of DEMN-shit -- and you like it!




    \\He gets quite defensive on their behalf. What does that say about Vern?

    And we know that?

    From you man-fly lying shit babbling. ;-P






    ReplyDelete
  47. Heh...

    she disclosed it.


    Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Convicted criminal? So... when we'd see him in jail?

    You know, that is where "convicted criminals" reside.

    But... he going on debates, with Biden... who should be responsible for PUTTiNG him in jail.

    Isn't it hilarious?

    ReplyDelete
  48. Old Rep appeared at DiBi's...

    Trying to talk-in some sense into him, privately. Here -- https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1518953907062235005&postID=2873355099696528298&bpli=1




    \\ I regard you as a generally smart bunch who maybe need to get out in the fresh air, eat a hotdog in the bleachers, swing a hammer in the hot sun....

    And when you'll understand -- that that is not the case.

    And never was.

    That's just an illusion.



    \\I believe we've been hoodwinked for a good long time already.

    With OPEN information that China DO building up their nuklear stockpiles to the M.A.D. levels???

    With OPEN information that RFia DO plans and devices developed AND TESTED of how to perform sneak attack on you???

    With all other obvious and OPEN information.

    DEMNs just DO NOT want to look at with their eyes WIDE SHUT???





    \\A multi level question. Do you really think he's going to be able to make 3am crisis decisions for a second term?

    You are one who don't get it, dude.

    "ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH *PLAN*"

    Of how to give up to force. And re-made USA into totalitarian state -- thought control, dissidents eradication.

    With that, it'll be TWO BIRDS with ONE stone:

    1) After becoming totalitarian RFia and PRCia will see USA as its peer, and will not wage war against.

    2) Political power will be firmly fixed in place in hands of Dem-Party AKA "Democracy it's Rule of Democrats".



    \\And if not...is it actually democratic, small d

    Oh... but you should be one who Understand it yourself.

    So... is it willful blindness???






    ReplyDelete
  49. Well... the more I look at it -- the more I see that my tech is good and sound not only from technological standpoint, but also economical and social.

    For all that people, instead of making wars... would start to try to grok new tech and introduce all ways of using it.

    Like it was with Computers in all this decades passed.

    Win-win.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I wish you nothing but success.

    Cuz we're sinking into an ever deeper mudhole of technological obsolescence as it is.

    ReplyDelete
  51. pShaw is no fun.

    It grown "too smart" -- not disclosing any anons that are not pushing DEMN cause.

    Yawn. :-((((((

    ReplyDelete
  52. Well... seems like good link -- https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/8092420/mod_resource/content/1/pdfcookie.com_viktor-shklovsky-a-reader-alexandra-berlina-transl-viktor-shklovskypdf.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  53. from link

    The well bred contradict other people. The wise contradict themselves.

    OSCAR WILDE“PHRASES AND PHILOSOPHIES FOR THE USE OF THE YOUNG” (C. 1894)

    ReplyDelete
  54. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/world-according-stanislaw-lem/

    ReplyDelete
  55. As Lem explained in a 1972 letter to Kandel, “Once you assume that such perfection EXISTS, you see it everywhere […] It was precisely such faith and not any kind of torture that led the accused to confess to the most absurd acts during the infamous trials.”

    Rings the bell, no? ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  56. “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood.”

    ― Ralph Waldo Emerson, Self-Reliance: An Excerpt from Collected Essays, First Series

    ReplyDelete
  57. Rings the bell, no? ;-)

    Yep, Democrats capping the pyramid.

    "Ah, NOW its' perfect!"

    ReplyDelete
  58. Yeah. And that is the reason of their animosity toward "trumpists": "You don't see Our Precious perfectness??? You must be insane!!!". :-))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  59. And see... what they hawling in DiBi's blog???

    That old farts ALREADY proclaiming Hot Phase of civil war...

    of course, they do not plan to participate in it personally and on the ground.

    They want to send brainwashed youngsters... to protect their Holy Bi-den.

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Facts, facts, facts and... lies, lies, lies. ;-P

    But of course -- DEMNs forgot about own lies. Because Google conviniently eradicated em out (have you see... that as of several past year -- Google Search LIMITs timed searchs only for a year?)

    ReplyDelete
  61. We're trapped in the eternal "now". Thanks google! More adverts for adult diapers, please! @@

    ReplyDelete
  62. Well... no reaction to a vid?

    ReplyDelete
  63. It's just interesting... for understanding what you see and how assess in it.

    Isn't it darn interesting information? ;-)

    Like could you see it happen in USA? By what reasons???

    ReplyDelete
  64. I don't think that people in the US are as put-off at the sight of double anputee's. We're becoming more comfortable daily with tech implants and wearables.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Yeah... so you do not see second layer of it?

    That being amputee -- means, you was on a frontline.

    So... can you devise it further, after such hint?

    ReplyDelete
  66. No comments... ;-P

    And.

    PS Russia needs Lent-Lease. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  67. Indeed, Rambo. You take joy in your enemy's pain. Want to know who I respect more? The Amish, who pray for the souls of their children's murderers. That they, too, will replace the suffering with peace. All suffering is meaningless. And most is unnecessary.

    ReplyDelete
  68. \\ The Amish, who pray for the souls of their children's murderers.

    THEIR children murderers???





    \\...and yes, THAT is what "empathy" is all about.

    Yep.

    Empathy.

    It allows to kill more efficiently. (c) Leon-Killer ;-P




    \\ All suffering is meaningless.

    Desires... is the reason of sufferings (c) Buddha




    ReplyDelete
  69. Yes, THEIR children's murderers. There's a Pennsylvania Dutch Amish community near us. A man went into one of their schools and killed a number of their children. They did not want the man to be punished, they wanted him to be "saved".

    And "desires" are the wishes of the "other"... You interpretation of the question of che voui (what does the other want from me?) that forms the person's objet petit 'a (the "object cause of desire").

    ReplyDelete
  70. It allows to kill more efficiently. (c) Leon-Killer

    No, it makes him seek "revenge" for Mathilda, to answer her che vuoi question.

    ReplyDelete
  71. The masochist performs for the sadist by saying, "beat me". The true sadist would say, "no".

    ReplyDelete
  72. "Being for others" is not a meden agan way of life.

    ReplyDelete
  73. In the Four discourse, the "analyst" is the "pervert's perspective" (che vuoi). Hence Slavoj Zizek's "Pervert's Guides to Cinema and Ideology.

    ReplyDelete
  74. \\Blogger -FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

    \\ Yes, THEIR children's murderers. There's a Pennsylvania Dutch Amish community near us. A man went into one of their schools and killed a number of their children. They did not want the man to be punished, they wanted him to be "saved".

    Again. 10.000.000s.



    \\You interpretation of the question of che voui (what does the other want from me?) that forms the person's objet petit 'a (the "object cause of desire").

    Still dunno.

    Might be some Western shtick.

    Yawn.




    \\No, it makes him seek "revenge" for Mathilda, to answer her che vuoi question.

    And not because he showed to him her pussy? ;-P Her object petit?




    \\The masochist performs for the sadist by saying, "beat me". The true sadist would say, "no".

    And became self-masochist? ;-P







    ReplyDelete
  75. \\Zizek's "Pervert's Guides to Cinema and Ideology.

    That's it... you are too far from soil. ;-P

    And Ukrainians in trenches -- are near.

    And Russian chmobicks -- are ONE with a soil. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  76. And that makes you envious.

    And tantalised by desire to became one with soil yourself.

    But... too bad, nukes -- can make you one with troposphere only. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  77. Why else would I call myself -FJ... Farmer John?

    I admit there may be still be some weeds in my beds/ fields. They're more "persistent" than I.

    ReplyDelete
  78. And with NEW tech you can became gardener again. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  79. Do you not recognize some of the "ideas" planted in my "virtual garden(s)"?

    ;)

    ReplyDelete
  80. \\Do you not recognize some of the "ideas" planted in my "virtual garden(s)"?

    Nope.

    I even in big doubts what that "virtual gardens" is???

    Your numerous blogs?

    Your "hunting grounds"???

    Your frequent excerpts from Ancient Greeks???

    That is not a pose or sneaky tactic of me -- I'm really foreigner, and really don't know.

    The way you VISIBLY don't know what you are saying... like about Ukraine.

    But... for you, VISIBLY, that do not pose a problem? You do not feel that something not right?

    Ehhhm, that's puzzling...

    ReplyDelete
  81. \\...foryou will never spy them all... ;)

    I like that music.

    But, you know, why I like listen to English music in particularly -- not understanding words, it's a bliss -- for not stumble on something stupid or incomprehensible.

    Or... well... just allow zone of Broca of a brain -- to slack off for a little. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  82. ...to slack off for a little :)))))))))))

    To turn off the post-modern "others' voice in your head, telling you what to desire. Whispering "Enjoy! Yes you CAN!"

    ReplyDelete
  83. ...or the authoritarian father/ "other's": No, You Can't! THAT enjoyment is mine!

    ReplyDelete
  84. dendrite touching dendrite... axon linked to axon... to soon be myelinated.

    ReplyDelete
  85. \\To turn off the post-modern "others' voice in your head, telling you what to desire. Whispering "Enjoy! Yes you CAN!"

    Naaaah.

    Just a noise of random words. ;-P




    \\...or the authoritarian father/ "other's": No, You Can't! THAT enjoyment is mine!

    Whatever.

    Anarchy -- is the Mother of Freedom. ;-P




    ReplyDelete
  86. Mother Anarchy. ;-P

    What... you thought only you can hyping? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  87. ...Mother Anarchy Brings Father Order and her temperance inevitably yields but temporarily to courage. But this transition... is it "wise" or "just"? Peace to War? but what from War to peace? Does that not require Mother courage and father temperance? Father order to mother freedom?

    So Mother Courage precedes mother Freedom. In the vast "order of things". ;)

    ReplyDelete
  88. ...Just following the "circularity" in hyping. Sometimes clockwise, sometime counter clockwise. Discoursing from the position of master to university professor to Hysteric to Analyst.... and back again.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Well... I prefer it about(inside?) techs. :-)

    More fruitful.

    ReplyDelete
  90. Then a food for animals, then meat... ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  91. Short translation:Calling her "whore of Satan"... ;-P

    PS I betcha... that is biggly conservative AKA 'Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others.'

    ReplyDelete
  92. ??? Not all "tech" is "biotech". fruits/vegetables metaphor worthy...

    ReplyDelete
  93. \\??? Not all "tech" is "biotech". fruits/vegetables metaphor worthy...

    But all techs are Evolution...

    ReplyDelete
  94. Are there helmet and pants events at this years games?

    ReplyDelete
  95. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  96. Would you try to guess what I doing just now? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  97. Oh... that was so long... after I was doing it last time. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  98. 2 In his criticism Lem did not spare the way scholars approach his oeuvre. The “super savants of Science Fiction Studies” (Bereś 2002: 546) who read his novels referring to theories of Lacan and Derrida seemed to him clumsy and unclear.

    https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/IL/article/view/IL.2016.21.1.12/8063

    ReplyDelete
  99. \\...pushing my Overton window?

    naaah.

    ReplyDelete
  100. An interesting paper... who read his novels referring to theories of Lacan and Derrida seemed to him clumsy and unclear.

    As rocket science usually is to cave-men. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  101. As for the Greeks, didn't they invent "optical perspective" (ie - Parthenon)?

    ReplyDelete
  102. \\As rocket science usually is to cave-men. ;)

    Or... vice versa ;-P

    Shaman of a foster tribe mumbling... to a anthropologist. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  103. \\As for the Greeks, didn't they invent "optical perspective" (ie - Parthenon)?

    Cave man techs?

    Yawn.

    Maya was even more proficient -- their buildings still stand, unlike...

    ReplyDelete
  104. \\ Anonymous Anonymous said...

    \\ Hah??? What that should mean?

    Still. What so funny in that picture??? Is there some hidden humor?

    ReplyDelete
  105. Well... have you heard it?

    DEMN-cretins hawling about dRumps becpming despot of USA.

    While senile Bi-den... declared itself Master of the World.

    %^))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  106. Ghost Recon... ;-P

    I played in it... oh, so long ago...

    ReplyDelete
  107. Sorry, the lone ranger has hung up his mask. All we have today is idiots pretending to be lone rangers whispering sweet nothings into the ears of others trying to convince them into becoming one.

    Charles Atlas, the 97 pound weakling, kicking sand into a bully's face. That's Ukraine all right. Before the muscles.

    ReplyDelete
  108. But, thanks for your service. Sorry about the injuries. Now you can become Hikikomori like me. Welcome to the Swarm.

    ReplyDelete
  109. \\Sorry, the lone ranger has hung up his mask. All we have today is idiots pretending to be lone rangers whispering sweet nothings into the ears of others trying to convince them into becoming one.

    And police are all worthless scum and dirty cops??? (well, dirty cops could do that at least for money).

    And brave warriors -- became scaredy mices. And all mighty CVs became bumkins??? %^)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Or that is just brains of one certain POTUS... became marshmallow? ;-P





    ReplyDelete

  110. When Sysadmins Ruled the Earth
    Craphound
    https://craphound.com › overclocked › Cory_Doctorow_...
    ... Books. It ... I wanted my kid to grow up in a world where cyberspace was free—and where that freedom infected the real world, so meatspace got freer too.


    %-P

    ReplyDelete
  111. Naah, you've pretty much summed up the whole tribe.

    ReplyDelete
  112. Well... so maybe it's time for sysad... I mean hikkis, to Rule over the World.

    Bu-ga-gah! :-)))))

    ReplyDelete
  113. We're all sh*tposters that form an autonomous anarcho-captialist collective who fly around the internet and throw commies and neo-liberals out of our helicopters (masters of the vortex). ;P

    ReplyDelete
  114. \\Naaah. Hikkis will always be "ruled".

    Have you read that text?

    Never say never... with sci-fi. ;-P




    ReplyDelete
  115. Obviously... will not be disclosed.

    Yawn.



    \\and not THE ACTUAL MAN WHO IS A CRIMINAL, A CONVICTED FELON, ADJUDICATED RAPIST AND TAX FRAUDSTER.

    And that "ACTUAL MAN" is in orange robe??? And behind bars???

    No? Then WHY??? ;-P

    Isn't because sore ass loser Joe KNOW how unruly "criminal convictions" are... and just NOT want to push insult to became an injury?

    ReplyDelete
  116. About reaction of the West.

    Well... RFia setting the standards of next WW. And West... rubber-stamping it.

    With silly idea that that standards WILL NOT be used against West.

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  117. And... here we go -- China troops on the border of NATO.

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  118. If there were standards for warfare, America would still be a British colony.

    ReplyDelete
  119. And if there'd be NONE... we'd have two more deserts... like Radioactive Sahara's.

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Meden Agan... as you say, there ALWAYS need to be some rules, some limits, some bounds...

    AKA Dynamic Equilibrium.

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  121. And for now USA makes EVERYTHING only for opposing force to grow stronger...

    as if that is good idea, to do something like that.

    Go figure...

    ReplyDelete
  122. Slowly... but surely, it grow... WW3. (someones call it even forth)

    ReplyDelete
  123. And if there'd be NONE... we'd have two more deserts... like Radioactive Sahara's

    One thing sometimes follows another. WWIII... Radioactive Sahara.

    ReplyDelete
  124. Yawn... but it's not Kronos who are standing at all rail-switchers of that railroad...

    (you surely know about that silly "psychological" quiz -- about fat man... and saving 10 people down-road?)

    ReplyDelete
  125. Oh... found you someone to talk about deism... I think. ;-)

    http://mirabilis-yearofwonders.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  126. Looks like a stale site. 6 month's since last post.

    ReplyDelete
  127. There is other...

    ReplyDelete
  128. I doubt I could handle 1,000 comic book pages. Besides, Deism is uninteresting. I prefer "The Big Other". ;)

    ReplyDelete
  129. Whatever.

    Isn't blogspot have some search by profiles? by interests of people?

    And... BTW, how many of your comments pShaw discloses?

    ReplyDelete
  130. /Doesn't blogspot have some search by profiles? by interests of people?

    Beats me. I think you need to Tweet your blog and let Twitter/X organize your communities, and maybe link to others from your own blog.


    /And... BTW, how many of your comments pShaw discloses?

    About half... unless I completely trash someone.


    /Propaganda? ;-P

    How should I know, I don't apeak Ukrainian and am not ambitious enough to translate. :p

    Guy looks like PeeWee Herman... @@

    ReplyDelete
  131. \\About half... unless I completely trash someone.



    \\How should I know, I don't apeak Ukrainian and am not ambitious enough to translate. :p

    That makes it MORE proper test.

    To see a fake. working be script and etc. As I able to see on your CNN.

    And don't tell me that you not get it -- that that is some headliner (is it correct term for your "talking heads" on TV) -- that stopped talking... because ka-booms happening, outside his studio...

    ReplyDelete
  132. \\About half... unless I completely trash someone.

    Sorry to hear...

    Well, that's how they rule over us.

    Because of OUR inability to seek for each other and unite. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  133. Knock-knock, Neo...


    OK, Google "online voice to text translators" ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  134. /CNN

    Yep. CNNi, the DoS and CIA owned mouthpiece.

    And a good tip, but I'm lazy, lazy, lazy...

    You're right, the propaganda is formulaic...

    ReplyDelete
  135. ...in America it's best characterized as "snark" and "boojum" (Lewis Carroll reference). The late-night TV shows are the prime example.

    ReplyDelete
  136. \\You're right, the propaganda is formulaic...

    Also... body language and general setup (like that 4(FOUR!!!) hours of preliminaries before actual dabates)

    Yawn.




    \\...in America it's best characterized as "snark" and "boojum" (Lewis Carroll reference). The late-night TV shows are the prime example.

    Yawn.

    Like only in USA.

    ALL World going after your example.

    Totalitarians first of all...

    ReplyDelete
  137. We RUN the world, so of course they follow our lead.

    ReplyDelete
  138. Until they'll not... and that is -- most dangerous moment.

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  139. An authoritarian father sets his children "free". They will either fly... or fall. Our influence has become harmful to successful flying.

    ReplyDelete
  140. Stop producing QE ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  141. ...then, it will cease it all...

    and USA will return into cosy Ol'Goo'Tims of Great Depression. ("be wary of what you asking magic ginie") ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  142. Do you know that motivation story???

    About a frog... and a bottle of milk. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  143. Hah.

    Seems like your Wisdom of Old Times "brits go soft-kill, americans -- hard-kill" gone "imprecise and even outdated...".

    New British premier allowed use of their Storm Shadows over RFia. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  144. Nope, feel free to regale me with a telling.

    Do you know the one about the princess and the frog?

    ReplyDelete
  145. Storm Shadow

    Why do you think they gave them to you? My answer - Cuz they prefer soft-kills.

    ReplyDelete