Sunday, April 27, 2025

The Role of Extinction in the Physical Process of Evolution in Replicators and in Non-Physical (Abstract) Ideas Like Constructor Theory

What is Knowledge?
Knowledge: A replicator that tends to remain instantiated in phyrical systems, and can cause transformations to occur, retaing the property of causing them again and again.

In Sum: That which allows for Resiliency through Replication
The fundamental Principle of Constructor Theory:
Whatever transformation is not forbidden by the laws of physics, can be performed  to arbitrarily high accuracy provided that the requisite knowledge is created.
Excerpt from video above:
The only way knowledge can be created under these laws of physics is by a non-directed process of trial and error correction steps.  And this is true of Natural Selection and of the knowledge creating process that occurs in people's minds.  But here we come to a fundamental distinction between the two, because in Natural Selection, the only way a non-adequate theory or idea, a non-adequate recipe for a bacterium can undergo Extinction is by actual death of the organism that it happens to be travelling in.  This is a feature of Natural Selection.  But it need not be so in general, for extinction.  In fact, in human minds, what happens is that whenever a theory is found to be parochial, that is to say that there are problems it cannot solve, the way it is eliminated, the way it undergoes extinction is by criticism.  And criticism is tentatively directed to progress, and it's a fundamentally non-violent process which doesn't involve death, if not of abstractions.  So as Karl Popper put it, we can let our ideas die in our place.  
Once thinking abilities have emerged, a new kind of extinction has become possible, that does not involve death... 
"one that is based on criticism and on actually criticizing abstractions.  So it is this kind of Extinction which is not only crucial for the creation of new knowledge, but with a Constructor theoretic insight, it is part of the very process where our endeavors to create, to perform transformations that are not forbidden by the laws of physics, take place.  An so this is how Constructor Theory lets us see how"
...Extinction can be a Constructor for future possibilities!

139 comments:

  1. Well... what is the difference between real knowledge... and utter BS?

    Well... he they caught at least one facet of it -- it productive.

    But, as from such lame observation as given here do not follow ANYTHING. By itself, it is a mere BS.(but well, BS... it's good manure)

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  2. \\So as Karl Popper put it, we can let our ideas die in our place.

    What an utter crap. :-)))))

    The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
    Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki
    The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is a book about the history of science by the philosopher Thomas S. Kuhn. Its publication was a landmark event in ...

    People... prefer to DIE, but not disengage with their ideas. You know my refs to one DiBi, which are good enough real world example -- with his idea of "wages". :-)))))

    Same do *I* (in your eyes for sure). Same do you.

    So. REAL progress comes with extinctions... of those who was brandishing that erroneous ideas. And substituted not with better/more true ideas... but just some another rubbish. Probably taken from scrapyard of History. Which is full of BS.

    But... as I said. And you successfully ignored that my verse -- BS, it's good manure.

    So -- THAT is the way how Knowledge do accumulate.

    First Lem accumulated some knowledge, out of his time, premature. Not exactly correct. But still, that is Brightly Shining Knowledge... some specks of it, in that what everyone other than me (as you for example, again) see as just a BS.

    So, it was laying on the ground, for ages. Not noticed, not interested for anyone. Before I found it, and saw the Truth (truth, it's not in words) behind it.

    Same as von Braun saw the Truth behind mere words of Tsiolkovski.

    Same as Brothers Write saw Truth behind... well, you say, they YOUR country heros.

    But. Who cares. That is just whole lot of manure. Of pure shit produced by culture(s)...

    Yawn.

    Abd you just like to shovel old piles of manure... without cause and goal... as it seen by me (mirroring how you perceive MY babbling about Lem).

    Yawn.

    PS And say that there NO Truth, NO Knowledge behind this my words too. Sigh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. \\Anonymous
    ???

    You like to criticize my views/ideas... but what is your ideas/views, I still dunno???

    What Capitalism? American? European? China version?

    Control??? Control of what? How? >>>>>Wouldn't it be easier to control... pretty much anything, when you SMARTER, and have superior techs?<<<<

    April 26, 2025 at 11:31 AM
    \\-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
    It's "universal"... the commodification of land, labour, capital, and now also, information.

    So what??? ;-P

    What Knowledge -- MEANS -- What logical and productive INFERENCE you can extract from brandishing that sentence around? ;-P

    My claim here -- you have nothing. You just hold full mouth of manure... in your mouth. ;-P (that's why I showing my tongue here so often -- to show that I DO NOT hold manure... in mine ;-P)

    ReplyDelete
  4. \\-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
    Competition's a b*tch.

    April 26, 2025 at 2:17 PM

    \\Anonymous
    Competitions that designed for you to never win -- yes, for sure.

    Like that example with DiBi's wages... it... holds so dear, to itself.

    Because they are PERFECT!!! Perfect Competitions. Competitions, where NOBODY except DiBi itself... was prescribed to win. ;-P

    With EVERYTHING, EVERY possibility, every bulletpoint of a rules PRE-DESIGNED for DiBi to "win an argument".

    Yawn.

    What to not like in such competitions???

    But well, they are so dear only for older people. With their overweighted with supporting lost cause ideas.

    Bright youth... starting from pre-schoollers... sees through it, right away.

    But... being children, teens, powerless youth. Have no power to straight up such a "are you a fooll, uncle Peter?".

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  5. \\Joe Conservative
    How useful is a truth to me? Should I modify it to suit some new circumstance. The truth learned by the catepillar brain is melted during metamorphosis. How now does the butterfly re-interpret the truth? Is the butterfly's food, as the catelipillar's, always "green" (or a trained blue)?
    April 21, 2025 at 1:46 PM

    YEP!

    You bent on seeking for such PRE-DESIGNED "competitions" -- where'd you be PRESCRIBEDto win.

    Yawn.

    Bu-ga-gah!!! :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
  6. \\Thersites
    "Power" will decide, either way. It's alchemy not science.
    April 24, 2025 at 9:36 AM

    Yep.

    T^hat is illusion -- old people brains do produce.

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  7. \\"Smartness" is a commodity to be bought or sold by those with a storehouse of commodified capital (ala billionaires). Step out of line and like Tesla, you will be crushed... no matter how 'smart' you are... no matter how much better you "tech" is. Tesla was giving away his energy. He wasn't "controlling" it.

    Whatever.

    Who said that that was what he wanted??? Such control.

    ReplyDelete
  8. \\-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
    Just be happy that they'll pay you a "surplus salary" to steal/ use your 'smartness' for their profit.
    April 26, 2025 at 2:25 PM

    Did you meant "miss-use" here?

    ReplyDelete
  9. \\Why do you think Putin's so angry?

    Put-in is dead... for more then a year.

    So... I **REALLY** dunno -- how dead people can have any emotions. Like being angry.

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete
  10. \\-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew
    His "credit card " read "insufficient funds".
    April 26, 2025 at 2:29 PM

    Not at all.

    Yawn.

    Level of extraction from RFia's economy, with excuse "that's... for a rightfool war" -- only grows!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yet here you sit, blogging/commenting with an old used-up and now retired former bureaucrat's lackey who hasn't read Lem or have any inkling of the diamond you've discovered in his works. I've had MANY epiphanies in my readings, from the great to the small. I always thought that the problems with literature stated with James Joyce (Dubliners) and the minor/ base epiphanies, but perhaps I am wrong. The ancients worried only about "being", but with modernity came a bigger one, Sein in der Welt, the source of all minor epiphanies, and "second order observation". So... maybe its' deeper, that we've stopped believing in myth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. \\Yet here you sit, blogging/commenting with an old used-up and now retired...

      You know that, that I have had previous experience... with yet one old. You know, DiBi.

      Your company, not that disinteresting. ;-)

      Delete
  12. My mother-in-law's "partner" had a saying, "Everything is bullsh*t". He wasn't wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah. 90% of everything is shit. Or... that was 99%? 99.999%?

      Well... that can stand as my reason here -- you seems like seeking of something that not shit... too. ;-)

      Delete
    2. The remaining 10% or 0.000001% to infinite zeroes is "god". No, not some "Creator" god. The six sigma 'Science's" god .The god of usefulness.

      Delete
    3. Oh... shuddup. :-)

      You just not very a[t with idea of Infinity.

      Go read some Kantor. ;-)

      Like about Infinite Hotel. ;-P

      Delete
    4. Hilbert's paradox of the Grand Hotel
      Wikipedia
      https://en.wikipedia.org › H...
      It is demonstrated that a fully occupied hotel with infinitely many rooms may still accommodate additional guests, even infinitely many of them.

      Delete
    5. ...but now you're leaving Banach Space and living in Hilbert Space.

      Delete
    6. A Hilbert space is a special type of Banach space. In essence, a Hilbert space is a complete inner product space, meaning it's both a Banach space (a complete normed vector space) and an inner product space (a vector space with an inner product). Banach spaces are more general, not requiring an inner product to define their norm.

      Delete
    7. Achilles will never catch the tortoise now, Xeno.

      Delete
  13. Imagine is Physicists could invent the laws of physics instead of discover/unravel them. Then one day *poof* the Universe instantiated them. The Universe wouldn't last ten standard minutes.

    Now imagine if I could re-write America's laws. I'd give it even less time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yap!

      Simulation Hypothesis. ;-)

      Well... programmer stills with such a dilemma all of the time.

      Delete
    2. Maybe it's why your computer can't decide when to halt...

      Delete
  14. Humanity is a series of evolutionary accidents that happened in a certain order over billions of years, and in billions of places. We're a collection of 37 trillion living cells that needed an idiot to keep it alive and watch out for the evolutionary collective.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Accidents? ;-)

      Go re-examine meaning of word "probability". ;-)

      Delete
    2. Right place, right time. Accidents. To be the right "assembly" in the right "factory environment" at the right "time" so that a "fusion" can occur, and the next higher assemblage achieved. There's nothing pre-destined about it. There is not ultimate "purpose" for all of it.

      Delete
    3. What is the "purpose"... in all that posts in Facebook and Instagram? ;-P

      But. Sheer number of em, makes wonders. ;-P

      Delete
    4. The same as language (once upon a time before the Pauline Inversion)... to scream to the world, "I am HERE!" Like Procne, Philomela and Tereus. Green language. The language of the birds.

      Delete
  15. ...and there are 7-8 billion idiots stumbling around now, every one a threat to our ability to "persist" for another day. Sein in der Welt.

    Hope you have a great line of BS to keep their feet off your neck.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Replies
    1. "Custom is like a King, and the Law, like a Tyrant"

      - Dio Chrysostom (Natural Law being adopted by social custom, not novel Legislation)

      Delete
    2. Power is the threat of force, of violence, behind the Law. Putin has the Power" to do as he wishes in Ukraine. America will not squander their Power to save Ukraine from Putin. It could, but it won't.

      Delete
    3. As Ben Franklin told American's, Join or Die. Since Ukraine cannot "join" it will face "extinction". Does the lesson of this post resonate, yet? It's "evolutionary" without a leading 'r'.

      Delete
    4. Knowledge is Power, whatever makes you powerful. It doesn't have to be true. As Nietzsche says, the criterion is power.

      Delete
    5. It's the criterion for "truth"

      Delete
    6. It's a 2nd order criterion, that doesn't necessarily, but can, lead to extinction/ death (as in the idea example of the video)

      Delete
    7. Hence... "...Extinction can be a Constructor for future possibilities!"

      Delete
  17. There are no "constants" in this "mixed" (Platonic) Universe. All such immortal "absolutes" (gods) reside outside of it. For as Parmenides said, "If One is not, then Nothing is".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Okay, Socrates said it, not Parminides. It's from Plato's "Parmenides" dialogue/ dialectic. And yes, dialectic is a concept, not a fundamental truth.... a shiny diamond in a pile of BS.

      Delete
    2. If that is a diamond... you should be able to show to me how it shines. ;-P

      But. Still. Never happaned. Whenever, in whatever text or occurance where I heard that word "dialectic".

      There was NOTHING behind it.

      Yawn.

      Even clap with one hand makes louder noise... than that meaningless euphemism for not knowing, devised by Western civilization.

      Delete
    3. Empty. Like that candy cover in that vid.

      Delete
    4. Empty, like a Yin without a Yang... Relativity without a relatable.

      Delete
    5. Dialectic... a criticism of an abstraction. thesis:antithesis

      Delete
    6. Yawn. Whatever.

      Delete
  18. \\Knowledge is Power, whatever makes you powerful. It doesn't have to be true.

    HAH! :-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Deception isn't power? Who knew?

      Delete
    2. Don't worry, the Science god will save you. I'm a Deist. I should know.

      Delete
    3. Tyche/ Fortuna... the god of probabilities/ chance.

      Delete
  19. \\Deception isn't power?

    For being able to deceive anyone -- one NEED TO be SMARTER than that anyone. ;-P

    Otherwise, that'll be self-deception. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...and yet an idiot can't deceive a genius. I don't know why I try... ;)

      Delete
    2. Genius... capable ti self-decieve himself much more successfully... because -- he genius. ;-P

      Delete
    3. ...yeah, explains why heaven so quickly goes to hell in a handbasket when the 'experts" (genius') are running things. Who was it that said he'd rather be ruled by 100 random selections from the Boston Telephone Book than 100 from the faculty of Harvard University...

      Delete
    4. Hah. :-)

      Think Harvard is some f*g factory of making geniuses??? :-))))))

      That'a'hella'killarious. %-))))))))))))))))))0

      Delete
    5. Gotta find workers willing to put their noses to the grindstone. And who better than those who have been certified to have passed the Pareto Principle test?

      Welcome to the Achievement Society. Got "burnout" habits?

      Delete
  20. Did you watched that vid? Groked it?

    Or "aren't you are fool, uncle Peter?".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's an hour and fifteen? minutes. I watched the first ten to get the general idea and will return later, when I'm not engaged with your other questions.

      And I admit, I am a fool to the end. But unlike Parsifal, will not likely find your grail, Fisher King.

      Delete
    2. 40 seconds
      Where adult gives a empty candy shell to a 4-5 years old... and laughing, like that is a great joke.
      But, laugh stops when receives sober and much more grounded and grown up response... from a kid, no less -- "are you stupid? Or what?"

      Delete
    3. I'll take it that Uncle Peter didn't get the "Dad" job.

      Delete
    4. Nobody do. That's why we devised God-Father. To fill that emptiness.

      Yawn.

      Delete
    5. Yeah, He's the source of all LAW, even the Laws of Physics. Because people can't stand to see other people having a fun time and won't leave them alone.

      Delete
  21. \\Thersites
    Don't worry, the Science god will save you. I'm a Deist. I should know.
    April 28, 2025 at 10:36 AM

    Do I need to be saved? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...from your belief in the Science god? He's as good as any.

      Delete
    2. ...He gives you "hope", bottled up in Pandora's jar, with the rest of the world's evils.

      Delete
    3. Otherwise you'd be convinced to do as Lessing's son did.

      Delete
    4. Hesiod, "Works and Days" (encore)

      [202] And now I will tell a fable for princes who themselves understand. Thus said the hawk to the nightingale with speckled neck, while he carried her high up among the clouds, gripped fast in his talons, and she, pierced by his crooked talons, cried pitifully. To her he spoke disdainfully: `Miserable thing, why do you cry out? One far stronger than you now holds you fast, and you must go wherever I take you, songstress as you are. And if I please I will make my meal of you, or let you go. He is a fool who tries to withstand the stronger, for he does not get the mastery and suffers pain besides his shame.' So said the swiftly flying hawk, the long-winged bird.

      Delete
  22. \\...from your belief in the Science god? He's as good as any.

    See? The power of Self-Deception!!! :-))))

    And where I have had mentiuoned "god of Science"???

    "Gawd of technologies"... maybe. But, Science. WUT??? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With that as given that neither "alchemist" nor "technologist" have any stable meaning... when you using em.

      Ehm???

      Delete
    2. A technologist typically applies established principles (usually the most recently established ones). An alchemist innovates with new, un-established ones (more like the scientist). Am I close?

      Delete
  23. \\Otherwise you'd be convinced to do as Lessing's son did.

    Whatever.

    You like to talk about "power of extinction", but -- showing here that you really don't get it.

    Those who died -- they unimportant. Alive coyotes better than dead lions. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like Evolution cares. ;-P

      Delete
    2. Think of how many organisms had to die for there to be coal in the ground today....

      There sure must not be any future uses for it...

      Delete
  24. \\Thersites
    Hence... "...Extinction can be a Constructor for future possibilities!"

    Naah. Only those or that what survived. Or, leaved some manure for ever after. But, to leave manure... in observable and meaning creating amounts, that/those need to be alive, and in big numbers.

    You surely know what coal made off? Or chalk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Failed experiments provide no useful information? Perhaps my next theory should change a random variable, and not keep track of failures.

      Delete
    2. ...but then again, why change ANY variable? The world is perfect as it is, Candide!

      Delete
    3. Pft!

      Like World CARES... perfect it, or not.

      Delete
    4. Nope, but I can think of 37 trillion cells who's idiot "pilot" does.

      Delete
    5. Well... that "pilot" can decide to stop being idiot. And to became SMARTER.

      Tough luck. I know. ;-P

      Delete
    6. This pilot receives no benefit from getting "smarter" other than for entertainment purposes. I've opted out of the capitalism game. I've become a pure "consumer" of other people's smartness.

      Delete
    7. Whatever.

      Only smartness opens doors for more and more games. ;-)

      Delete
    8. Only smartness can see and seize Kairos when he spot's him running by. Me, I've got too much grease on my hands to grab anything. I'm too busy masturbating.

      Delete
  25. \\...an infinite within an infinite.

    Yawn.

    Whatever.

    All infinities are different. But they still are equally inifinite ;-P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. all abstractions are different, but they're all equally abstract.

      Delete
    2. Who knows... I'm not an expert. ;-P

      Delete
    3. ..at least in a universe within an infinite multiiverse

      Delete
    4. Like "infinity of love in God"? ;-P

      Delete
    5. Naaah, my G_d's a real mean mf'er! And believe it or not, the only thing He LOVES to do is "dance".

      Delete
  26. \\Empty, like a Yin without a Yang... Relativity without a relatable.

    Only in theory theory and practice are the same.

    And. Theory without practical use -- dead. And practice without theory behind it -- dangerous.

    ReplyDelete
  27. \\Maybe it's why your computer can't decide when to halt...

    And who said that it need to? Anthropocentrism?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Isn't some anthropcentric mechanic needed to clear the jams on your von Neumann probe?

      Delete
    2. Or is it plugged into a neutron star power source that'll never go Nova...

      Delete
    3. Hah.

      And not Reality itself?

      Delete
    4. Is reality infinite? What about entropy? A constant low energy state?

      Delete
    5. For our purposes -- it is.

      As we unable to count number of atoms in our bodies.

      WHAT we can know about infinity?

      Delete
  28. Wrong.

    Many died, so now we can burgeoning on their corpses, to burn em in our furnaces.

    But -- not vice versa.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...making CO2, warming the planet, and ultimately killing you, and making a new layer of coal for the planet.

      Delete
  29. \\A technologist typically applies established principles (usually the most recently established ones). An alchemist innovates with new, un-established ones (more like the scientist). Am I close?

    ???

    There is no alchemist alive, to ask one. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sure there are. Ask George Soros. He invented "The Alchemy of Finance". He's just not a "materialist".

      Delete
    2. He's an alchemist of abstractions, like the exchange value of currencies.

      Delete
    3. ...but then the subject content of this thread 9extinction) appeared uninteresting and hardly useful to you...

      Delete
    4. The man who broke the Bank of England can surely make the US Dollar vulnerable to extinction.

      Delete
    5. Why did life develop? Perhaps abstractions were necessary after a certain assembly index to accelerate the evolutionary process.

      Delete
    6. Before crushing it all in the next nearby Supernova explosion.

      Delete
  30. \\..at least in a universe within an infinite multiiverse

    From Infinity standpoint... even our Universe, that looks SO BIG!!! to us. Is just meaningless speck of sand.

    Well... even Multiverse (of kind narrow homo sapiens could fathom especially) -- same indistinguishable speck of dust.

    Yawn.

    We just too stupid to fathom Infinity. ;-P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...because to grok it, one would have to put a "limit" around it and study it and say "this (inside) which I have examined, is the infinite". That is how our language works, absolutes and unknowns only exist "outside" of it.

      Delete
    2. Our "cognitive light cones" can only reach so far.

      Delete
    3. ...and this extends into the micro-"scopic" dimensions as well.

      Delete
    4. In other words, Mr. Leibnitz, there are no monads. The fractals keep going... and going.

      Delete
    5. ...and their chaotic patterns ever can't be seen.

      Delete
  31. \\He's an alchemist of abstractions, like the exchange value of currencies.

    Pft! :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Magicians (like David Copperfield) also say that they do Real Magic...
    while that just a smoke and mirrors. :-)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

    Dunno why you give to him so much credit. Like he is some real deal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ...because whenever the CIA with USAID overthrows a government, he has first dibs on the choicest resources.

      Delete
  32. \\The man who broke the Bank of England can surely make the US Dollar vulnerable to extinction.

    Hah.

    And not dRump with his moronic playing with government authority and finances??? ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  33. \\One day Kairos will run by, but you won't recognize him til he's past.

    ;-P

    ReplyDelete
  34. \\...so why do you think Trump killed USAID and is destroying the globalists economic supply chains?

    Preparing for III world war? Or... just being fool?

    Yawn.

    ReplyDelete