“They saw their injured country's woe;
The flaming town, the wasted field;
Then rushed to meet the insulting foe;
They took the spear, - but left the shield.”
...of diminishing into oblivion? Yawn. Maybe. But I bet that other USA would not play... Charlie Gordon... that much. Law of Unpredictable Consequences, you know.
The Prophet Dervish Z Sanders Minus: The charges were legally adjudicated "false".
Via Copilot...
🧠 Fact‑check of the blogger’s claim.
Saying the charges were “legally adjudicated false” is incorrect.
The Senate acquitted Trump both times, meaning he was not convicted or removed from office.
But acquittal does not mean the charges were legally ruled false -- it means the Senate did not reach the two‑thirds majority required to convict.
No court of law adjudicated the charges; impeachment is a political process, not a judicial one. 🛑 November 29, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Cretin Derpy just admitted that all DEMN hawling "but dRump are criminal"... have NO juridical base what so ever. And was just a nasty political shit-throwing with hope that something would stick... yawn.)))))) December 5, 2025 at 11:47 AM
Not at all. Dervish and co-pilot simply expounded the actual truth.Trump was essentially acquitted. There simply was not enough voted to convict. Minus man and anon above are simply expressing their opinion. One demonstrably incorrect.
//Minus man and anon above are simply expressing their opinion. One demonstrably incorrect.
Opinion?
Like "nobody is guilty until proven opposite"... OPINION????
LIKE...
The presumption of innocence is a fundamental legal principle that considers a person accused of a crime to be innocent until their guilt is proven in a court of law. This means the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, which must present compelling evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused does not have to prove their innocence. Key aspects Burden of proof: The prosecution, not the defendant, is responsible for proving the guilt of the accused. Standard of proof: Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If there is still a reasonable doubt after all the evidence has been presented, the accused must be acquitted. Protection of rights: This principle is crucial for a fair trial and protects individuals from being unfairly labeled or punished before a conviction. International recognition: It is recognized as a fundamental human right under international law, including the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Application: In a criminal trial, the accused is considered "the accused" or "the defendant" until a guilty verdict is reached. While they may be held in custody awaiting trial, they are still presumed innocent.
PS Still not subverted by DEMNs COMPLETELY AI still able to summarise. But I am sure -- it will be "fixed" too, soon. With declaring Habeas Corpus... merely a subjective opinion.
Naaah. He's just idiot.(if you think that I call people idiots too freely... for example, Lessy are not that idiot, like idiot idiot... but a religious one) ;-)
Because it BS propaganda? Yawn.
ReplyDeleteBiggest tech bubble ever.... but would make all future $$$ worthless. You'd have to be 'stupid" to create artificial intelligence.
DeleteYep. Better let China make. To create world without USA.
DeleteYawn.
Sounds like a plan! ;)
Delete...of diminishing into oblivion? Yawn.
DeleteMaybe.
But I bet that other USA would not play... Charlie Gordon... that much.
Law of Unpredictable Consequences, you know.
Go ahead.... attack Wakanda!
Delete"If you know your enemy... and know yourself... well, yawn
DeleteBTW, you are too reliant on DEMN narratives... for one claiming being "conservative".
DeleteHeh... I see that you have busy time... fighting against windmills... I mean, against DEMN cretinism.
ReplyDeleteYawn.
Added my 5 cents there. ;-p
ReplyDeleteThe Prophet Dervish Z Sanders
Minus: The charges were legally adjudicated "false".
Via Copilot...
🧠 Fact‑check of the blogger’s claim.
Saying the charges were “legally adjudicated false” is incorrect.
The Senate acquitted Trump both times, meaning he was not convicted or removed from office.
But acquittal does not mean the charges were legally ruled false -- it means the Senate did not reach the two‑thirds majority required to convict.
No court of law adjudicated the charges; impeachment is a political process, not a judicial one. 🛑
November 29, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Cretin Derpy just admitted that all DEMN hawling "but dRump are criminal"... have NO juridical base what so ever. And was just a nasty political shit-throwing with hope that something would stick... yawn.))))))
December 5, 2025 at 11:47 AM
Not at all. Dervish and co-pilot simply expounded the actual truth.Trump was essentially acquitted. There simply was not enough voted to convict. Minus man and anon above are simply expressing their opinion. One demonstrably incorrect.
Deleteimpeachment is a political process, not a judicial one.
DeleteDo you have problems with understanding English, anon-alterEgo? ;-p
Or... just stooopid.)))))
Delete//Minus man and anon above are simply expressing their opinion. One demonstrably incorrect.
DeleteOpinion?
Like "nobody is guilty until proven opposite"... OPINION????
LIKE...
The presumption of innocence is a fundamental legal principle that considers a person accused of a crime to be innocent until their guilt is proven in a court of law. This means the burden of proof lies with the prosecution, which must present compelling evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused does not have to prove their innocence.
Key aspects
Burden of proof: The prosecution, not the defendant, is responsible for proving the guilt of the accused.
Standard of proof: Guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If there is still a reasonable doubt after all the evidence has been presented, the accused must be acquitted.
Protection of rights: This principle is crucial for a fair trial and protects individuals from being unfairly labeled or punished before a conviction.
International recognition: It is recognized as a fundamental human right under international law, including the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Application: In a criminal trial, the accused is considered "the accused" or "the defendant" until a guilty verdict is reached. While they may be held in custody awaiting trial, they are still presumed innocent.
PS Still not subverted by DEMNs COMPLETELY AI still able to summarise. But I am sure -- it will be "fixed" too, soon. With declaring Habeas Corpus... merely a subjective opinion.
Yawn.
Those DEMNazis.
Dervy thinks that Justice is a process, not a virtue... and most of the time he denies the very process.
DeleteNaaah. He's just idiot.(if you think that I call people idiots too freely... for example, Lessy are not that idiot, like idiot idiot... but a religious one) ;-)
Delete