Sunday, February 28, 2021

Social Distancing

On Leftist Elites and Their Fears of Ideological Harassment by the White Working Class

24 comments:

  1. I'm not going to comment on the vid which after 2 mins struck me as attention seeking, boring trash, no matter how stylishly packaged.

    But going back to the 'inevitability' of violence, I do think that applies to the much needed destruction of Neoliberalism.

    The ruling elites will never cede power, nobody ever does willingly.

    So we will have to force them. The ballot box will not work here as the pols are in cahoots with said elites. Only brute force may work.

    So a war will have to started but we need to be 'certain' of a win, otherwise it's meaningless slaughter.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree, the video was sh*t.

    That's why "now" is the time for "theory" and Bartleby-an "inaction". We can all accept the immense slaughters resulting from Divine Violence (Walter Benjamin terms) but who has stomach enough to initiate even a single small "failed" (and therefore meaningless) death" through "Mythic Violence"? For there to be "virtue" in the cause of opposing "systemic" violence, it must be "successful", lest it be considered "rashly/ foolishly" (vice "wisely") initiated.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I, for one, currently can only see one "myth" worthy of "mythic" violence. That of a legally limited anarcho-capitalist bourgeoisie (invisible hand/radically progressive economy). Everyone who stands in its' way either gets a free one-way helicopter ride to the central Pacific Ocean, or a "first violation only" plane ticket beyond the national border. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your "anarcho-capitalist bourgeoisie" reminds me of a medium size village with a 'butcher, baker, candlestick maker' in a free market (but NOT capitalist, except in a ideological sense of the word)

    Such an idyllic initial state can only degrade (by your invisible hand) into agglomeration into larger units and ultimately, monopolism. How do you propose to prevent that?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The way it has always been done, progressive taxation to 100% and corporate chartering with limited market caps.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If I'm going to limit "government" I can certainly limit large corporate trusts.

    ReplyDelete
  7. In other words, the invisible hand will be "visible" only in its' limit.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nobody is "alienated" enough.

    https://youtu.be/DJQtozWKCyg

    ReplyDelete
  9. ...hence the need for "Divine" violence. Believe me, when the system collapses and all those 401k's become worthless people are going to be feeling plenty 'alienated'.

    ReplyDelete
  10. ,,,because unlike the Fed's printing presses, it recognizes some "limits".

    ReplyDelete
  11. The way it has always been done, progressive taxation to 100% and corporate chartering with limited market caps.

    Because that worked so well?

    ReplyDelete
  12. It worked before the taxation tilts all moved to favor the inherent efficiencies of "large scale" enterprises and increasing aggregate efficiencies became the focus of, and paramount to, governmental concerns.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hmmm... all the best with it anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why Trump isn't finished yet.

    He'll stand in 2024, thereby dividing the RP in two and handing victory to the DP. 'When two dogs fight for a bone...'

    ReplyDelete
  15. Perhaps he'll mumble the words that we all LONG to hear...

    datta
    dayadhvam
    damyata


    ...and ALL will be well again!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Whatever happened to Abracadabra?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Yeah Lyndon LaRouche ran for President from a prison cell too.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Not if he gets Whitey Bulger's or Jeff Epstein's cell. There will still be the matter taking Trump supporters seriously despite there literally never existing a rational reason for doing so.

    ReplyDelete
  19. taking Trump supporters seriously despite there literally never existing a rational reason for doing so.

    Winning one election and narrowly losing another isn't 'a for' taking them seriously'? Who knew?

    Far Right populism will win elections, unless the plutocracy is beaten...

    ReplyDelete

  20. "Far right populism" is an oxymoron.

    Really? In what way? What would you call Nigel's Farage's 'UKIP' party?

    ReplyDelete