- #ReleasetheMemo...are they now too afraid to risk, Liberty?
What is our aim?
It is the use of the constitution for the benefit of the people.
Who is likely to oppose us?
The rich and the corrupt.
What methods will they employ?
Slander and hypocrisy.
What factors will encourage the use of such means?
The ignorance of the sans-culottes.
The people therefore must be instructed.
What are the obstacles to their enlightenment?
The paid journalists who mislead the people every day by shameless distortions.
What conclusion follows?
That we ought to proscribe these writers as the most dangerous enemies of the country and to circulate an abundance of good literature.
The people- what other obstacle is there to their instruction?
Their destitution.
When will the people be educated?
When they have enough bread to eat, when the rich and the government stop bribing treacherous pens and rogues to deceive them and instead identify their own interests with those of the people.
When will this be?
Never.
9 comments:
PLEASE FORGIVE ME FOR POSTING THIS REVIEW, BUT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT AND RELEVANT TO ALL PUR NEEDS AND CINSIDERATIONS.
Joe's great, but President Trump is much greater.
Please forgive me for posting the review. It IS relevant to ALL of us and will be ALWAYS.
_______________ SOTU REVIEW _______________
President Trump has already been privately criticized for "parroting" Bill Clinton's SOTU of twenty-odd years ago. To this I said:
If a REPUBLICAN expresses and idea, it’s automatically regarded by the ENEMEDIA as unspeakably VILE. If a DEMOCRAT should say the same thing, however, the presstitutes will immediately say it deserves to be inscribed in 24K gold letters on the frieze of one of the District of Columbias’s many whited sepulchers
Now, those of you who delight in harping on the president's widely reported use of vulgar, inappropriate language – at a PRIVATE meeting ––, the president has faltly denied saying the ugly-if-singularly-appropriate word. Why are you apparently eager to believe that he did say ut? And "at this point what difference does it make” anyway? ];^}>
President Trump’s style last night could only be described as dignified, restrained, –– even a bit subdued –- but he remained admirably focused on others he deemed worthy of recognition, applause and compassionate consideration throughout.
His addresst was strong without being unduly belligerent or bellicose regarding our adversaries abroad. His leisurely-paced delivery of the carefully prepared address was flawless, –– poised, relaxed, obviously sincere –– and impressively generous in its regard for the needs and feelings of others. I didn’t count them, of course, but the number of times he said “I” were notably sparse.
I was never an admirer of Mr. Trump in the past, but I have been mightily impressed with how beautifully he has grown since he first entered the race to take on the daunting, always thankless task of trying to lead the Free World to a much needed Renaissance before the darkness of tyrannical Globalist Socialism administered by an Oligarchy of Self-Serving Moguls and Intellectual Morons imposes mutually-shared poverty and degradation on all of us forever.
May God protect our president, as He continues to bless America!
Personally, I believe that Democrats are no longer willing to tolerate a "loyal opposition". They've become quite "Robespierrian".
I'm wondering why the Republicans weren't allowed to rebut Trump's far-left wishlist.
Hilarious to me was the incompetence Trump brings to government. Y'all want him to keep illegals out of America when he can't even keep them out of the balcony at his own State of the Union address.
That's been true of every President since HW Bush. It's been a hallow "party" for nigh on 30 years now.
Your Republicans are the biggest beneficieries of cheap southern labour.
I don't actually mind them here, particularly if they bankrupt the welfare state faster.
I'm mostly mocking the fact that people actually believed Donald Trump was going to do something about it.
Sure he is. He's going to "legalize" another 1.6 million of 'em.
Trump can "pencil whip" a perceived problem with the best of them. Especially if it will help remove the illusion of government malfeasance or impotence.
Why all the talk of deportation then?
You already know I don't have much use for Trump (maybe it's the Mandela effect, I come from the universe where Republicans have balls) but the fact that Trump didn't pause his SOTU Address to have illegal immigrants cleared from the balconies of Congress with rifle butts to the face on national TV pushed my contempt for that mendacious loser to a new level.
Post a Comment