.

And by a prudent flight and cunning save A life which valour could not, from the grave. A better buckler I can soon regain, But who can get another life again? Archilochus

Thursday, October 22, 2026

What's Your Heart Rate?

from Google AI:
A normal resting heart rate for healthy adults ranges from 60 to 100 beats per minute (bpm) while calm and inactive. [1]
Key Resting Heart Rate Guidelines
  • Standard Adult Range: 60–100 bpm
  • Athletic / Fit Range: 40–60 bpm (or lower, down to around 37–38 bpm in ultra-trained athletes) is common and usually healthy
  • Bradycardia: A resting heart rate consistently below 60 bpm (concerning if accompanied by dizziness, fatigue, or fainting)
  • Tachycardia: A resting heart rate consistently above 100 bpm [1, 2, 3]

An average human heart beats about 35 million to 37 million times in a year. [1, 2]

  • The Breakdown
    • Per day: Approximately 100,000 beats (based on an average resting rate of 60 to 100 beats per minute).
    • Per year: Roughly 35 million to 36.8 million beats.
    • Per lifetime: About 2.5 billion to 3 billion beats over a 70- to 80-year lifespan according to health insights from the Cleveland Clinic Health Essentials. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    Note: The exact number changes depending on your individual heart rate, age, fitness level, and how much time you spend resting or exercising
  • On Scaling - Extracting Laws from Platonic Space

Now Where did I put that Intelligence?

Michael Levin

Timestamps:
00:00 - Intro 
01:16 - Platonic Space 
03:55 - Biology in the Absence of Evolution 
21:11 - Extracting Knowledge from Platonic Space 
37:04 - Development and Loss Functions 
50:09 - Investigating Layers of Control 
55:35 - Is Computer Science Misleading Our Understanding of Minds? 
58:14 - Bioelectric Patterns and Drug Discovery 
1:04:07 - How to Build a Predictive Developmental Model 
1:13:20 - Levin’s Top Books, Thoughts on Collective Existence 
1:18:00 - Questions that Keep Michael Up at Night 
1:22:32 - How Does Levin Interact with AI?

Humans - Storing Intelligence OUTSIDE of their bodies... books, digital archives, computers, and AI

Overcoming Biological Scaling Limits 

Wednesday, October 21, 2026

Chronos vs Kairos

Time Inside and Outside an Informational Markov Blanket/ Boundary
It from Bit
Spacetime Emerges from Changing Relationships (Entanglement) within and across the boundary

from Google AI:
In modern theoretical physics, the idea that gravity is an emergent phenomenon arising directly from quantum entanglement is one of the most prominent frameworks for understanding the universe. [1, 2]
While it remains an unproven mathematical theory, it has completely shifted how physicists approach the unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity. Instead of viewing gravity as a fundamental "force" that needs to be chopped up into particles (gravitons), this school of thought treats gravity as a secondary macroscopic byproduct—much like how inflation or temperature isn't a property of a single atom, but rather emerges from the collective behavior of countless atoms. [1, 2, 3, 4]
1. The Holographic Principle and "Spacetime from Bits"
The foundation for this idea lies in the Holographic Principle and the AdS/CFT correspondence discovered by Juan Maldacena. [1, 2]
  • Mathematically, physicists can model a universe where a 3D bulk space containing gravity is entirely projected by a 2D boundary of quantum particles that do not experience gravity. [1]
  • When the quantum particles on the 2D boundary become deeply entangled, they form intricate networks of quantum data. [1]
  • The math shows that the geometric structure of the 3D space—and the way objects move through it—is just a visual translation of that entanglement. If you destroy the quantum entanglement on the boundary, the geometric fabric of space and gravity in the bulk completely collapses. [1]
2. ER = EPR (Wormholes equal Entanglement)
Proposed by Leonard Susskind and Juan Maldacena, ER = EPR posits that the geometry of space and quantum connections are the exact same thing. [1, 2]
  • ER (Einstein-Rosen Bridges): Wormholes or tunnels connecting distant points in space via gravity.
  • EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox): Quantum entanglement, where two distant particles are instantly linked.
  • The Conjecture: The framework suggests that if two particles are quantum entangled (EPR), they are actually connected by a microscopic, subatomic wormhole (ER). Gravity and physical distance are simply macroscopic manifestations of how these microscopic quantum links are woven together. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
3. Entropic and Coded Gravity
Other mainstream variations of emergent gravity approach the problem from different angles:
  • Entropic Gravity: Proposed by Erik Verlinde, this theory treats gravity as an "entropic force" rather than a fundamental field. As quantum information changes and entropy shifts, it pushes matter around, creating the macroscopic illusion of gravitational pull. [1, 2]
  • Quantum Error Correction: Recent breakthroughs view spacetime as a giant Quantum Error-Correcting Code (QECC). In this view, gravity is the physical manifestation of the system trying to protect and rearrange quantum information across its network. [1, 2, 3]
The Ultimate Catch: Is it true for our Universe?
While the mathematics for these frameworks is highly precise and beautiful, it has a major limitation: it is currently calculated inside idealized, toy model universes (specifically, anti-de Sitter space, which has a negative cosmological constant and bends differently than ours). [1]
Our real universe is expanding and flat/positively curved (de Sitter space). Physicists are actively working to translate these emergent-gravity mathematics into a model that matches our actual night sky, but for now, it remains a brilliant, mathematically robust hypothesis rather than an experimentally proven fact.