...and browbeat and berate us every day at 4pm... in the early 90's. You didn't want to be a Contractor working for GE on a FFP contract on your end, with them on a CPFF one with the Government. He'd milk you for every penny, and force cost over-runs and product investments on your end. He was a pr*ck!
Farmers Letters
.
And by a prudent flight and cunning save A life which valour could not, from the grave. A better buckler I can soon regain, But who can get another life again?
Archilochus
Saturday, February 28, 2026
Thursday, February 26, 2026
Views from Silicon Valley, Curtis Yarvin: Breaking the Future
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00 – What Is Sovereignty?
11:34 – Elections vs Authority
24:08 – Institutional Continuity
37:52 – AI as Acceleration
52:41 – Bureaucratic Limits
1:07:29 – Responsibility Problem
1:17:42 – Debt & Fiscal Fragility
1:31:05 – Reform Constraints
1:49:44 – Regime Stability
2:07:10 – What Breaks First?
from Google AI:
Curtis Yarvin, a blogger also known as "Mencius Moldbug" who advocates for replacing democracy with a "CEO-led" monarchy, has developed a significant following within elite Silicon Valley circles. His anti-democratic, "neo-reactionary" ideas (often referred to as the "Dark Enlightenment") have gained traction among prominent tech founders, investors, and influencers who are disillusioned with traditional institutions.Key figures in Silicon Valley associated with or influenced by Yarvin include:
- Peter Thiel: The PayPal co-founder and venture capitalist is often described as the primary supporter and "patron" of Yarvin, with some referring to Yarvin as the "house political philosopher" of the "Thielverse".
- Elon Musk: While Yarvin has stated he has not met Musk, the Tesla and X CEO has echoed ideas similar to Yarvin's regarding the restructuring of government, with Yarvin's work influencing the "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) agenda.
- Marc Andreessen: The prominent venture capitalist has called Yarvin a "friend".
- J.D. Vance: Although more closely associated with Washington now, the Vice President has praised Yarvin by name and previously echoed his ideas on "de-wokification" and dismantling the federal bureaucracy.
- Blake Masters: The tech entrepreneur and politician, associated with Thiel, has also expressed admiration for Yarvin.
- David Sacks: The Craft Ventures partner and podcaster, who is close with Musk and Thiel, has been identified as a key figure spreading these anti-progressive, anti-democratic ideas within the tech scene.
- Alexander Karp: The Palantir CEO has also been associated with this group of founders, CEOs, and thought leaders.
Influence and Impact
- "The Cathedral": Yarvin's theories often center on dismantling what he calls "the Cathedral"—a term for the combined power of the media, universities, and government, which he believes should be replaced by a "sovereign corporate" structure.
- "RAGE": He coined the acronym RAGE ("Retire All Government Employees"), which directly influenced the "drain the swamp" and bureaucracy-slashing rhetoric of the second Trump administration.
- "Redpilled": Yarvin is credited with popularizing the "red pill" meme in tech circles, used to describe a, often politically right-wing, awakening to a "suppressed truth".
- Reach: His Substack newsletter, Grey Room, boasts 57,000 subscribers, and his ideas are often discussed within the "New Right" podcast and intellectual scene.
Yarvin's followers in Silicon Valley generally believe in the idea of "techno-feudalism," where society is managed by technocratic elites or "genius" founders, unconstrained by government regulation or democratic processes
Tuesday, February 24, 2026
Down the Time:Gravity Rabbit Hole with a Feynman AI
from Google AI
Space, time, matter, energy, and information are deeply intertwined, forming the fundamental structure of the universe. General relativity reveals that matter and energy warp spacetime (gravity), while special relativity shows mass and energy are interchangeable (). Information acts as a fundamental, conserved record of physical states, encoded within the spacetime fabric and quantum systems.
Key Relationships:
- Spacetime & Matter/Energy: Einstein’s general relativity posits that spacetime is not a static container, but a dynamic fabric that bends, expands, and contracts based on the distribution of matter and energy. Matter tells spacetime how to curve, and spacetime tells matter how to move.
- Matter & Energy: Einstein's mass-energy equivalence,
, proves that matter and energy are essentially different forms of the same "substance." Matter can be converted into energy, and vice versa.- Information & Physical Systems: Information is now considered as foundational as energy and matter. In modern physics, especially regarding black holes, information about a physical system is not lost but is encoded, often imprinted on spacetime itself.
- Space & Time: Special relativity merges three-dimensional space and one-dimensional time into a single four-dimensional continuum known as spacetime, where the separation between space and time is relative to the observer.
- Summary: Matter and energy shape the geometry of space and time. Information holds the state of matter and energy, while the evolution of this system is played out across the spacetime continuum.
Monday, February 23, 2026
Quantum Computing: Moving Beyond Goedel?
from Google AI:
The intersection of Kurt Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems, Richard Feynman’s vision for quantum computing, and the limitations of physical simulation touches on fundamental questions about the limits of mathematics, logic, and reality.
1. Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems (1931):2. Feynman’s Quantum Computer (1981–1982):
- Gödel proved that any consistent formal system capable of describing basic arithmetic cannot be both complete and consistent.
- Incompleteness: There are true statements within the system that cannot be proven using the system's own rules.
- Self-Consistency: The system cannot prove its own consistency.
- Implication: Mathematics is an open, non-zippable system, not a finite set of axiomatic truths.
- Richard Feynman proposed quantum computers because he realized that simulating quantum mechanical systems on a classical computer is computationally overwhelming (scaling exponentially).
- Nature is Quantum: Feynman argued that since nature is quantum mechanical, a simulator must be quantum mechanical to be efficient.
- Beyond Classical Limits: A quantum computer uses superposition (qubits in multiple states simultaneously) to bypass the exponential slowdown of classical, deterministic computers
3. Connecting Incompleteness, Quantum, and Feynman Uncomputability in Physics:
- While Gödel addressed mathematics, recent research suggests that Gödelian incompleteness applies to physics. For instance, determining the "spectral gap" in certain quantum systems is proven to be undecidable (uncomputable), meaning no computer—classical or quantum—can solve it.
- Limitations of Simulation: Although quantum computers are more powerful than classical ones, they are still "computers" (based on physical laws). Some suggest that if a system is fundamentally uncomputable, a quantum computer cannot solve it, implying that Feynman’s dream of simulating all of nature might encounter fundamental, logical limitations.
- Decidability vs. Computability: Gödel’s results show that some truths are not provable. Quantum mechanics introduces intrinsic, probabilistic "uncertainty" (not just epistemic, but fundamental) that differs from the deterministic "uncomputability" that Shannon-Turing computers face, though quantum systems themselves can hold "hidden information".
Feynman’s quantum computer solves the exponential complexity problem of classical simulation, but it does not bypass the logical limitations established by Gödel. Both fields point to a reality that is richer than any single, finite, axiomatic, or algorithmic system can completely describe
Sunday, February 22, 2026
The Chiral Universe(s)... Deleuze was Right!
from Google AI:
A chiral universe refers to the fundamental property that the laws of physics and the structure of matter possess a specific "handedness," meaning they are not superimposable on their mirror image. This inherent asymmetry, or chirality, affects everything from subatomic weak interactions to the building blocks of life, such as amino acids and sugars.Key Aspects of the Chiral Universe:Fundamental Physics: Particle physics shows that the universe behaves differently when reflected in a mirror. Specifically, weak interactions only involve left-handed fermions and right-handed antifermions, violating parity.Origin of Life: Biological life exhibits a strict preference for specific chiral forms—left-handed amino acids and right-handed sugars. This, or molecular asymmetry, is crucial for how biological systems function.Cosmic Asymmetry: Chirality is not limited to Earth; it is observed in interstellar space, such as the detection of the chiral molecule propylene oxide in the Sagittarius B2 cloud.Theoretical Implications: The universe's handedness is a fundamental, unsolved mystery that helps define the structure of natural laws. Some theories suggest that early cosmic radiation might have influenced this molecular preference.
Significance:
The concept is essential for understanding the origin of life and the fundamental forces of nature. The "chiral puzzle of life" refers to how this specific symmetry-breaking occurred, as life relies on these specific, uniform structures to function efficiently.
from Wikipedia and Google AI:
Birefringence, also called double refraction, is the optical property of a material having a refractive index that depends on the polarization and propagation direction of light.[1] These optically anisotropic materials are described as birefringent or birefractive. The birefringence is often quantified as the maximum difference between refractive indices exhibited by the material. Crystals with non-cubic crystal structures are often birefringent, as are plastics under mechanical stress.
Birefringence is responsible for the phenomenon of double refraction whereby a ray of light, when incident upon a birefringent material, is split by polarization into two rays taking slightly different paths. This effect was first described by Danish scientist Rasmus Bartholin in 1669, who observed it[2] in Iceland spar (calcite) crystals which have one of the strongest birefringences. In the 19th century Augustin-Jean Fresnel described the phenomenon in terms of polarization, understanding light as a wave with field components in transverse polarization (perpendicular to the direction of the wave vector)Key Aspects of Birefringence
- Causes: Occurs in crystals with non-cubic structures (intrinsic) or materials under stress (induced).
- Mechanism: Light splits into two perpendicular, polarized rays: the "ordinary" (o-ray) and "extraordinary" (e-ray).
- Formula:
Birefringence () is quantified as the maximum difference between refractive indices:.- Types:
- Uniaxial: One optic axis; crystals like calcite or quartz.
- Biaxial: Two optic axes; more complex crystalline structures.
- Applications:
- Optics: Waveplates, polarizers, and liquid crystal displays (LCDs).
- Microscopy: Polarized light microscopy identifies minerals, polymers, and biological samples.
- Forensics/Biology: Used to study fibers, starch granules, and in sperm selection (head retardance analysis).
- Gemology: Identifies gemstones like emeralds or rubies.
Birefringence can create visual effects like double images (doubling) or vivid color interference patterns, particularly when viewed under polarized light.

Was Deleuze Right? Space is a Subset of Time? Are the squiggly r=0 and r=Infinity lines above representing the zero-point energy vacuum field and does it produce this chiral Quaternionesque 360 degree+ lensing effect (ie- Time Crystal) in Space-Time? Do Black Holes (White Holes in Mirror Parallel Anti-Universe) feed into the same Zero-Point Energy Field?
Space is a Field of Transcendence (Zero-Point Energy) and Time a Point of Immanence (the Now) in "Being"
Space is a subset of Time
The Present is a Special Case of the Past
The Debt Einstein Owes Leibnitz
The Identity of Indiscernibles from google AI:
The Identity of Indiscernibles (II) is a metaphysical principle stating that if two entities share all their properties, they are actually the same entity. Coined as part of Leibniz’s Law, it dictates that numerical difference (being two separate things) requires some qualitative difference (a different property).Key Concepts and Context:
- Definition: If for every property
F, an object x has Fif and only ifthen x and y are identical (x = y).
y has F,- Leibniz's View: It argues that there cannot be two distinct things that are absolutely identical in every respect (e.g., two identical spheres).
- Counter-arguments: Critics like Max Black proposed scenarios where two identical items could exist in different locations, challenging the idea that spatial location is an intrinsic property that makes them distinct.
- Indiscernibility of Identicals (II vs. IdI): This is a closely related but distinct, less controversial principle stating that if two things are identical, they share all properties.
Key Aspects of the Principle:
- Properties Defined: The principle often includes all properties, including spatial and temporal ones.
- Ontological Status: It is considered an ontological principle, rather than a rule of natural science.
- Alternatives: Some philosophers argue that objects can be numerically distinct even if they share all their qualities (a view often referred to as "individual haecceity" or, as in the case of Max Black's, a challenge to the principle).
Why it Matters:
- It impacts discussions on the nature of space and time.
- It influences theories on substance, individuality, and whether two items can ever be "exactly" alike.
Saturday, February 21, 2026
Buddhism: Replacing Unpredictable Autonomy with a Predictable Ego Ruled by It's 'Compassionate' SuperEgo (for Everyone BUT the Autonomous Self)
Ego: Managing Shame thru Social Positioning
Leftism: A Crisis of Individual Purposelessness? Or Social Status? Perhaps BOTH.
Intra-Group Rivalry: I Want to Be Seen as the Goodest (Most Supportive and Compassionate) Person in My Collective Identity Group (which Identifies as LEFT and has the Most Intra-Group Social Capital)!
Wednesday, February 18, 2026
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)