.

And by a prudent flight and cunning save A life which valour could not, from the grave. A better buckler I can soon regain, But who can get another life again? Archilochus

Friday, August 2, 2024

Yanis Veroufakis - Technofeudalism

Excerpt from video above:
Wherever we turn, we witness the Triumph of Capital. Capital has prevailed everywhere, in warehouses, factories, offices, universities, even in public hospitals, in the media, in space, but also in the microcosm of genetic engineering. So how do I dare claim that Capitalism has been killed, by whom? The deliciously ironic answer is that Capitalism was killed by its' own hand, by Capital.

If I am right, the issue is not what AI will do to us in the future, but what has already happened. Capital became so dominant that it mutated into a variant so toxic that, like a stupid virus, it killed off its host, Capitalism and replacing it with something far, far worse. This new Mutant Capital that killed Capitalism lives in the proverbial Cloud, so let us call it "Cloud Capital".

What is Cloud Capital? What makes it so different? Cloud Capital of course does not really live up in the clouds, it lives down here on Earth, comprising Network machines, Server Farms, cell towers, software, Aid driven algorithms, and of course, it lives on our oceans floors where Untold miles of optic fiber cables rest. Unlike traditional Capital from fishing rods, to the steam engines of the Industrial Revolution, to today's modern industrial robots that are produced by the means of production, Cloud capital does not produce anything. It comprises Machines, manufactured so as to modify human behavior. That's what Amazon's Alexa, or Google's assistant, or Apple's Siri is, it is a produced means of Behavioral modification. It is a machine a piece of Capital which we train to train us, to train it to train us, and so on, and so forth. To determine that which we want, and once we want it, the same network machine sells it to us directly, bypassing markets.

As if that were not enough, the same Machinery succeeds in making us sustain the enormous behavioral modification machine Network to which it belongs with our free voluntary labor. We are sustaining it as we post reviews, rate products, upload videos rants, photos... we help reproduce Cloud Capital without getting a penny for our labor. In essence, it has turned us into its' Cloud Serfs.

Meanwhile in the factories and the warehouses where waged proletarians work under increasingly precarious conditions, the same algorithms that modify our behavior and sell products to us directly, those algorithms are deployed, usually by digital devices tied to the workers wrists, to make proletarians workers in the warehouses in the factories work faster, to direct and to monitor them in real time.

I started by saying that wherever we turn, we stumble on the Triumph of Capital, but it is Cloud Capital that is the real winner. It is amazing how it performs at once five roles that used to be beyond Capital's capacities:
-Cloud Capital grabs our attention
-It manufactures our desires
-It sells to us directly outside any traditional markets that which is going to satiate the desires it made us have
-Cloud Capital also drives proletarian labor inside the workplaces
-And finally, it elicits massive Free Labor from us, the cloud serfs
Is it surprising that the owners of this Cloud Capital, let's call them "Cloudalists", that these people have a hither to undreamed power to extract?
-Gargantuan Surplus Value from proletarians?
-Untold quantities of Free Labor from almost everyone
-And mind numbing Cloud Rents from Vassal Capitalists, from Sellers
Is it a wonder that they are vastly more powerful than Henry Ford, or even Rupert Murdoch could ever be? "Hang on," I hear you say. Is Jeff Bezos really different to Henry Ford? Aren't they all a species of Monopoly Capitalist monopolists?

No, amazon.com is not a monopolistic Capitalist Enterprise. The moment you enter amazon.com you have exited Capitalism altogether. Sure enough, the place is teaming with buyers and sellers, so yes, it is an enormous trading platform. But no, a "market" it certainly is not. One man called Jeff owns everything, but he's much, MUCH more than a mere monopolist. Jeff doesn't own the factories that produces stuff sold on his platform by traditional capitalists who have to use it to ply their trade.
 
What he does own is more important. Jeff owns the algorithm that decides which products you see, and which You Don't See. The very algorithm that you have trained to know you perfectly, so that it matches you with a seller, whom it also knows perfectly well, with a view to maximizing the probability that every such matched transaction will generate, for Jeff, the highest rent that Jeff can charge the Seller for what you buy. Up to 40% of what you pay is pocketed by Jeff, the Cloudalist.

The Mind Rebels at the enormity, but also the radical novelty of this kind of exploitation. The same algorithm that we help train in real time to know us inside out, that same algorithm both modifies our preferences and administers the selection and delivery of Commodities that will satisfy these preferences. If you and I were to type "electric bicycles" or "binoculars" while in amazon.com, you and I would get totally different recommendations. In a traditional Market or shopping mall, it would be as if you and I were walking next to each other, our eyes trained in the same direction, in the same shop window, but we were to see different things, depending on what Jeff's algorithm wants each one of us to see. Everyone navigating around amazon.com, except Jeff Bezos of course, everyone in amazon.com is wandering around in an algorithmically constructed isolation, as if in a panopticon, where we're unable to see each other. We only see Jeff's all-seeing algorithm, or more accurately, only what his algorithm allows us to see, with a view to maximizing his Cloud Rent, which is of course today's version of the Ground Rent that the feudal Lor'ds used to extract from their vassels, and their peasants. This is not Capitalism. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to technofeudalism!

How did Cloud Capital kill Capitalism? How did it rise up? Who paid for it?

Capitalism, lest we forget, had two pillars: markets and profit. Of course, markets and profit remain ubiquitous. Nevertheless, Cloud Capital has evicted both markets and profit from the center of our socio economic system, pushing them out to its' margins and replacing them. Markets, the medium of Capitalism have been replaced by Cloud thieves. Digital trading platforms like Amazon.com or Alibaba, which as we saw look like, but are not, Markets and Profit the fuel of Capitalism. All that has been replaced by its feudal predecessor, Rent, but specifically, a new form of Rent. A Cloud Rent that must be paid for access to those Cloud thieves, or "digital platforms".

So how did Cloud Capital emerge? It began life in the late 1990s when the original internet, which was a Commons. It functioned as a Capitalism-free zone. That original internet, internet 1.0 if you want, was privatized by the emergent big Tech. And who paid for the trillions it cost to manufacture and to accumulate Cloud Capital so quickly in the hands of so very few Cloudalists? The startling answer is, the G7 countries central banks mostly.

How did that happen? Well, by accident. Or to be more precise, by crisis. After the financial sector collapse of 2008, our Central Bankers printed up to $35 trillion to bail out the bankers. At the time when the governments were subjecting our peoples to harsh austerity, Capitalists were clever enough to foresee that the many would be too impecunious to buy their stuff. So instead of investing, they took the central bank money to the stock exchange and the bond markets, where they bought shares and bonds, along with Yachts, art, Bitcoin, NFT's, any asset they could lay their hands on.

The only Capitalists who actually invested in Capital, were big Tech owners. For example, nine out ofevery $10 that went into creating Facebook came from these Central Bank monies. That's how Cloud Capital was financed, and how the cloudalists became our new ruling class. As a result, real power today resides not with the owners of Machinery, buildings, Railway and phone networks, industrial robots... These old-fashioned terrestrial Capitalists continue to extract Surplus Value from wage labour of course, but they are no longer in charge, as they used to be. They have become vassels in relation to the owners of Cloud Capital, of the cloudalists. As for the rest of us, we have returned to a former status, as serfs contributing to the wealth and power of the new ruling class, with our unpaid labor in addition to the wage labor we perform when we get a chance to do it.

"But surely," someone will say, "...this is still Capitalism, isn't it?" So, you're still unconvinced. I know, it is hard to part with the term, with the word "Capitalism". It is not just liberals who think of Capitalism like fish think of the water they swim in, as natural. Socialists, too, need to feel that our purpose in life, the reason why we came on to this Earth, is to overthrow Capitalism. The news that I bring, that Capital beat us to it and now we have something worse in cCapitalism's place. That news is hard to accept. Indeed, it is mostly my fellow traveling leftist friends who try to dissuade me, to convince me that "Yes, Cloud Capital may be important, but this is still Capitalism, mate! Let's call it "Rentiere Capitalism" or "Monopoly Capitalism"," they suggest. But that simply will not do.

Cloud rent is not like Ground rent, because it requires massive investment in new tech. And it is not Monopoly rent either, because Bezos and Zuckerberg, instead of monopolizing markets to sell their manufacture's, like Henry Ford and Thomas Edison did, Bezos and Zukerberg have replaced Markets, and have no interest in manufacturing anything, unlike Henry Ford and Thomas Edison.

"How about 'Surveillance Capitalism'?" Again no, it won't do. Cloudalists do not simply use algorithms to brainwash us on behalf of advertisers in an otherwise Capitalist setting. No, Cloud Capital reproduces itself through our Free Labor. It directly exploits waged labor and it squeezes Cloud rents from Vassel Capitalists in trading platforms that are not Markets. This is not Capitalism folks, any kind of Capitalism.

But what about the observation that technofeudalism is parasitic on the Capitalist sector within it? Yes, it is true, were the conventional Capitalists to die out, Cloudalists would perish, unable to skim off Cloud rents from the manufacturers.

So what after Capitalism, overthrew Feudalism? Capitalists were also parasitical land owners, in the sense that without private land producing food, Capitalism would wither similarly. Now, while the traditional Capitalist sector feeds technofeudalism, it is Cloud Capital and Cloud rent that dominate.

Does it matter whether we call it technofeudalism or some form of Capitalism at this point? It is important to recall Max's Maxim, that the point is not to "interpret" but to "change" the world. So does it matter if this is still Capitalism or whether we call it technofeudalism? I think it does. Recognizing that our world has become technofeudal helps us grasp the enormity of what it will take to organize the victims of exorbitant power, the exploited, who now include not only wage laborers, but also the hordes of cloud serfs, who are reproducing the very Cloud Capital that keeps them in a state of deepening precarity.

The concept of technofeudalism drives home the point that organizing Auto Workers and nurses, while still essential, is insufficient. It elucidates what it will take to organize the movements against the fossil fuel cartel, when our means of communication are run on Cloud Capital primed to poison public opinion. It explains how the shift to electric cars caused German de-industrialization, as profits due to precision mechanical engineering are being replaced by rents, extracted by owners of the Cloud Capital, keeping tabs on the driver's routes and in-cabinhabits.

Elon Musk's decision to buy Twitter suddenly makes a lot more sense. Twitter, for Musk, is an interface between his mechanical Capital stock at Tesla and SpaceX, and Cloud Capital. The new Cold War between the United States and China, especially after the War in Ukraine, is explained as the repercussion of an underlying clash between two technofeudalism. One whose Cloud rents are denominated in dollars, the other in Yuan.

Isn't it mindboggling? It took mind-bending scientific breakthroughs, fantastical neural-networks, and Imagination defying AI programs to accomplish what? To create a world where while privatization and private Equity assets strip all physical wealth around us, Cloud Capital goes about the business of asset stripping our brains.

To own our minds individually, we must own Cloud Capital collectively. Once we have reclaimed our minds, we can put them collectively to work out a way to create a new Cloud Capital Commons. It will be damned hard, but it's the only way we can turn our cloud-based artifacts from a produced means of Behavioral modification, to a produced means of human collaboration and emancipation.
"Cloud serfs, Cloud proles, and Cloud Vassels of the World Unite! We have nothing to lose but our mind chains!"
We obviously don't know Jack about Economics...
More from Yanis on Democracy

206 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 206 of 206
Anonymous said...

Face of Zombie? ;-P could you recognize what it was originally?

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Documents... handmade fotos vs. handmade stories/narratives.
Captain's log...

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

Capt. America's arch-enemy Redskull? ;p

Anonymous said...

:-))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))0

Heh... almost. %^)

Anonymous said...

Ah-ah-ah...art. :-))))))))))))))))))

-FJ the Dangerous and Extreme MAGA Jew said...

It's only art if the artist is anonymous. :)

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 206 of 206   Newer› Newest»