A Poem Written by a Google AI for this Festive Occasion:
Thou knavish Puck, with purple juice, dost blind the mortal sight,
Wherewith the foolish lovers dote upon the fleeting night.
Sweet Bottom, crowned with long-eared ass, enjoys a queen’s embrace,
While silly swains do run amok and mar their proper grace.
They trip, they fall, they cry aloud, by elvish sport beguiled,
And wake to find their frantic woes were but a vision wild.— Robin Goodfellow
28 comments:
//Chat GTP is 100% attention. It cannot create "meaning" on its' own. It repeats and pays attention to our created meanings more dutifully than any human can.
Exactly.
And why do you think I dewised my tech???
I don't know how, exactl,y your tech works. Is memory purely in the materials?
Is it holographic, like a protons?
what do you mean by de-wised?
"Dewise" is most often a misspelling of the verb devise, which means to plan, invent, or design something using intelligence and creativity.
Sorry, I'm still misspelling.((
But, it looks so fitting to me. An par with debug, defrag, decode, etc.
With meaning "to unwind, to rewrite something"
To rewrite something that was seen as wise ;-p
Heh.
That's because there is no simple intuitive analogy.
Like how we did improved steam engines (made em tighter). Or hiw Aboom works -- just more concentrated more powerfull blast.
But no, there is analogy -- Evolution.
But, sadly, it not intuitive for you...(((
Why Evolution so slow?
Because there is indirect claim -- designs need to be able to reproduce themself.
And that makes it so rare -- all conditions met, for something news ti appear.
And our techs way more different.
Things like horizontal genes exchange is just everywhere.
Like, (one can take an engine from a car and make an airplne, and vice versa)
And then -- mass-produce. That we [now very well
But still, we do staggering on design stage very much.
There,s not that many skilled engineers. And they not veryapt to share knowledge (like you and me as example -- 5 years already as I try to talk with you, but still quite far from any success)
AI -- much better with it -- hoarding information.
But it, very limited in understanding.
That,s wh^ my other idea-- simplifying tech itself, so AI could start "groking" it.
That's all -- idea in a nutshell -- mass-produce designs AND make AI learn hiw to choose more effective.
Of course, that is simple onky on words. Nobody did it before. And nobody knows how to make it eight. ;-p
De-wise. The innocent fool. Parsifal and the Fisher King.
An AI Parsifal...
De-wise the existing workflows and materials used, and recombine/ rearrange into an improved one.
Problem is that our Fisher King is a capitalist, and the basis of all decisions, economic...ultimately not necessarily utilitarian or functional. Use vs exchange value. Surplus value. The Labor theory of value when all labour is automated and priced at near zero (or the energy cost)?
Value today isn't in the labour. It's in the "intangible assets" of the capitalist (info/understanding).... the work flows and knowledge that AI now generates and unseats "labour" from the process of mediating social relations.
And AI simply mines the "labour" that went into producing data and information for free like Parsifal and recombines and repackages it. It's truly schizoid performing schizo-analyses on a user's collected data and subsequently presents a system of objects to purchase to a consumer as the consumer is in a mental state to appreciate the product placed and buy it.
That's the 'capitalist" version, anyway.
The Technofeudal Lords direct the Ais (commodified information) who direct the Tchnofeudal Vassals (who direct the remaining commodified mass-production labour) who supply the purchases to the Technofeudal serfs (who's commodity fetish is exploited).
Yawn, BS.
Capitalism is the same as always -- about alication limited resources for the sake of production for the sake of value exchenge…
That's the process, but you ignore the frame within which it operates.
The size and scale of that "scarce resource" allocation matters. Large scale investments flourish and expand in Desitter space. Small scale investments are sucked into anti-Desitter space where they shrink and disappear into a black hole of irrelevancy.
...leading to the world's 1st trillionaire and wealth inequality distributions growing increasing larger (shrinking middle class).
//That's the process, but you ignore the frame within which it operates.
What a silly taunt.
Yawn.
That is I who teaching you systems engineering works, and how Evolution and History unwind…
//The size and scale of that "scarce resource" allocation matters. Large scale investments flourish and expand in Desitter space. Small scale investments are sucked into anti-Desitter space where they shrink and disappear into a black hole of irrelevancy.
Because current techs limitations.
And that's why there is need for a new ones.
Yawn.
Remember Black Queen wisdim -- to go somewhere, you need to run TWICE as faster
Yawn
I prefer to shrink the space.
Your frame isn't localized enough to employ the equivalence principle.
Yeah, yeah... History itself "not enough localized"
in accordenc with some superficial principle... ou-yeah.
yet one superficial idea
I prefer pragmatic ones...
Like cheating?
Post a Comment