“They saw their injured country's woe;
The flaming town, the wasted field;
Then rushed to meet the insulting foe;
They took the spear, - but left the shield.”
―Philip Freneau
.
And by a prudent flight and cunning save A life which valour could not, from the grave. A better buckler I can soon regain, But who can get another life again?
Archilochus
Sunday, September 6, 2026
Here we Go Again...
Does this Signal an End to the Need for the Jones Act?
Or a New Beginning?
30 comments:
Anonymous
said...
You can try to find this comment on DiDi's blog.
Or... that comment will be stating an argument you'll have nothing to answer. And only reveal how stooopid you are, if that argument would be disclosed. ;-p
But... this little secret is between us. We will not share it with anyone. Yes, Davy? ;-p
The fetishist's mind.... I know very well that what you say is true, but... (it will not serve to keep me in control). The fetishists disavowal
Fetishistic disavowal is a psychoanalytic concept where a person acknowledges a traumatic or uncomfortable reality but simultaneously refuses to let it affect their underlying belief, famously summarized by the formula: “I know very well, but still...” [1] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAy5D6GEnrg), [2] (https://www.vanderbilt.edu/AnS/english/Clayton/engl337a/clemons/term-fetishism98.html)Key Origins and Meaning
Freudian Roots: Sigmund Freud originally used disavowal (Verleugnung) to describe how a child reacts to the traumatic realization of anatomical difference (such as the absence of a penis in women). The mind creates a substitute—the fetish object—to act as proof that the disturbing reality isn't true
To take what you say into consideration would require me to think critically, and not simply bask in my own lazy/ easy presuppositions... so I'll disavow/ dismiss it.
What is an "influencer". What is it that an influencer attempts to do? Why is rhetoric so useful in this endeavor? Don't think, feel. Stroke pathos, and wash away logos.
Tell me a joke. Do the hard work of constructing it, and then allow me to express the "excess" mental energy saved by me in hearing the joke, and express it as "laughter".
I just have had a talk with fellow programmer. (if you want, I can give a link... but you'll hardly find something for you there) Thoughtfull and calm. But, our overview are too similar. And discusdion stalled after barely started. Because we think toom similar -- have nothing to discuss. No sparks to start a flame.
So why don't you just have a discussion with an AI. They give better conversations than most people. And there is generation from opposites. A 'spark'...
Help keep the web a welcoming place to create We rely on blog readers to report content that they find inconsistent with Blogger's Community Guidelines. When something is reported, it's not automatically removed. Reported content is reviewed by human reviewers to verify it violates those Community Guidelines. If it does, it is removed from Blogger. The author won't know who made the initial report.
Sure, Dervy and Mystere report each other all the time. I used to commend regularly at Drudge Retort (not Report) all the time until I got my 3rd "strike" and was banned. Like Shaw... a "progressive" website.
ps - I left Facebook because of the warning labels they placed on my comments. Seems they knew the "truth" about things and I was spreading misinformation everywhere...
30 comments:
You can try to find this comment on DiDi's blog.
Or... that comment will be stating an argument you'll have nothing to answer. And only reveal how stooopid you are, if that argument would be disclosed. ;-p
But... this little secret is between us. We will not share it with anyone. Yes, Davy? ;-p
But.,. something tells me -- you'll not. ;-p
Yet one.
Do you know what syllogisms is? ;-)
You proposed syllogism
Those without critical thinking -- are Trampists
I only applied your syllogism to your case.
You visibly have no critical thinking (no self-criticism, for example)
Therefore (by your own definition)-- you Trampist. ;-)
Or... you have something against Logic?
My prediction.
Socialists -- they allergic toward Logic
//I WELCOME any information that would indicate I am mistaken, misinformed, or flawed in my reasoning.
BS
You severly lacking in understanding how capitalism works.
And that is easy to show -- in just one question -- from where come money to pay salary?
But.
You'll NEVER admit it.
And probably even not disclose this comment
As the worm turns... ;)
Yeah.
He grown arrogant.
And beliving in own invincibility.
It disclised that comments.
//You can't offer any information on critical thinking or rational rebuttal.
Ones you'll not discloser under some faked premice?
Stooopid. Do you think *I* as commenter -- WILL NOT NOTICE WHAT my COMMENTS YOU DID NOT disclosed and why? ;-p
Silly-silly Davy.
Lacking of critical thinking -- imagined that not openly revealed (because pre-moderately removed it) == not makung mistakes. )))
But, continue-continue, stupid.
And not you poor thing. ;-p
That fears to disclose that comments.
And even as I see -- deleting already disclsed. ))))
What they do with their profiles, they also do in their own minds....
The fetishist's mind.... I know very well that what you say is true, but... (it will not serve to keep me in control). The fetishists disavowal
Fetishistic disavowal is a psychoanalytic concept where a person acknowledges a traumatic or uncomfortable reality but simultaneously refuses to let it affect their underlying belief, famously summarized by the formula: “I know very well, but still...” [1] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAy5D6GEnrg), [2] (https://www.vanderbilt.edu/AnS/english/Clayton/engl337a/clemons/term-fetishism98.html)Key Origins and Meaning
Freudian Roots: Sigmund Freud originally used disavowal (Verleugnung) to describe how a child reacts to the traumatic realization of anatomical difference (such as the absence of a penis in women). The mind creates a substitute—the fetish object—to act as proof that the disturbing reality isn't true
//What they do with their profiles, they also do in their own minds....
Before...
yawn.
//(it will not serve to keep me in control
do you not want to control yourself?
or you think I want/can control you?
yaaawn
)))))))
To take what you say into consideration would require me to think critically, and not simply bask in my own lazy/ easy presuppositions... so I'll disavow/ dismiss it.
What is an "influencer". What is it that an influencer attempts to do? Why is rhetoric so useful in this endeavor? Don't think, feel. Stroke pathos, and wash away logos.
Tell me a joke. Do the hard work of constructing it, and then allow me to express the "excess" mental energy saved by me in hearing the joke, and express it as "laughter".
I just have had a talk with fellow programmer.
(if you want, I can give a link... but you'll hardly find something for you there)
Thoughtfull and calm.
But, our overview are too similar.
And discusdion stalled after barely started.
Because we think toom similar -- have nothing to discuss.
No sparks to start a flame.
So why don't you just have a discussion with an AI. They give better conversations than most people. And there is generation from opposites. A 'spark'...
For what?
To make EM smarter? ;-p
Do you know about?
Help keep the web a welcoming place to create
We rely on blog readers to report content that they find inconsistent with Blogger's Community Guidelines. When something is reported, it's not automatically removed. Reported content is reviewed by human reviewers to verify it violates those Community Guidelines. If it does, it is removed from Blogger. The author won't know who made the initial report.
...by adding to "common" knowledge? Why not? Do you have a "proprietary" interest in it?
Afraid a techlord will steal the technoserf's value?
Sure, Dervy and Mystere report each other all the time. I used to commend regularly at Drudge Retort (not Report) all the time until I got my 3rd "strike" and was banned. Like Shaw... a "progressive" website.
If my blog is banned and taken down, so what? I certainly don't give a sh*t.
ps - I left Facebook because of the warning labels they placed on my comments. Seems they knew the "truth" about things and I was spreading misinformation everywhere...
;-p
well, you do.
But,.. like I care
Naaah.
Have no time to waste on it.
Same as you... ;-p
Well, MAGAs do spread more disinformation a b d misinformation than anyone else.
Based on DEMN cretinic babbling?
Yap.
Post a Comment