0:00 The Good Man Myth: Why we felt sorry for Walter
0:52 The Most Important Question: When did he become this?
1:44 The Last Excuse: Did he really do it for himself?
2:52 The Invisibility Wound: The cancer was just a trigger
3:37 Hubris, Hexis, Agnoia: The Ancient Greek Map of Walter White
4:40 "I am the one who knocks": Pure Hubris explained
5:15 Hexis: How character is carved by small choices
6:47 Socrates’ Warning: No one is bad on purpose
7:45 Essence vs. Mask: Why Heisenberg was an escape, not a truth
9:03 Gurdjieff and the Mask that eats the Face
10:12 A Personal Story: My rebellion in High School
11:58 Why School produces workers, not human beings
12:53 The System’s Grade: Defining your value through others
14:44 The 4 Types of People Society creates
16:15 The Invisible One & The "Good Cause" Danger
18:40 Finding Harmony: How Music became my Philosophy
20:30 Sleep is Slavery: The Depth of our Cultural Amnesia
21:11 Eudaimonia: The energy of living your true nature
23:13 Look Around You: Do you see Walter?
Hubris: To cross your own limitExis: Having become something You are what you gave become, the result of your choices_Agnoia: Knowing who you are (inner point of reference)Essence & Mask: What is carved deep/ what you are, and Persona, what you perform. Personality eats up essence. Essence is undeveloped.
Hexis (ἕξις) is an Ancient Greek word meaning a settled state, stable disposition, or habit of character that is ingrained through repeated practice. [1, 2, 3]Meaning and Etymology
- Root: It comes from echein, meaning "to have" or "to hold". It translates literally to "having" or a "possession" of a quality.
- Definition: It is a deep-seated condition of the mind or body, rather than a fleeting emotion or a temporary mood.
Role in Aristotle's Philosophy
- Foundation of Character: In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle explains that virtues and vices are types of hexeis.
- Habit and Action: Our repeated actions (ethos) form our habits, which solidify into our character (hexis).
- Second Nature: Through continuous practice, a virtuous action (like acting courageously or honestly) stops requiring hard deliberation and becomes an automatic part of who you are.
More:
Dynamis (δύναμις) is the Ancient Greek word for power, potential, or capacity. In philosophy—particularly Aristotle’s—it is the foundational concept of potentiality, representing the latent ability for something to exist, act, or be acted upon.
Direct Comparison: Dynamis vs. Hexis
To understand dynamis, it is easiest to look at it right alongside hexis. While they both relate to human character and ability, they represent entirely different stages of development:
Concept Meaning Nature Human Example
Dynamis(δύναμις) Potentiality or raw capacity. Innate, unformed, and neutral. It can go in any direction. The innate capacity to feel anger, learn a language, or become a musician.
Hexis(ἕξις) Actuality or settled disposition.Acquired, stable, and morally directed through habit. The settled habit of being a calm person, speaking fluent Greek, or playing the piano.
Key Aspects of Dynamis
Raw Material: Dynamis is what you are born with. Everyone has the dynamis to be virtuous or vicious, but that raw capacity itself carries no moral weight.
The Principle of Change: Aristotle defined dynamis as a source of change in something else, or in itself acting as something else. For example, an acorn has the dynamis to become an oak tree.
Two-Way Power: Rational dynamis can produce opposite results. The raw capacity to doctor someone is the exact same capacity used to poison them; it requires a chosen, trained hexis to ensure the power is used for good.
Moving from Potential to Character
In Greek ethics, your life's journey is about transforming dynamis into hexis through energeia (activity/action):
You start with Dynamis: You have the raw biological capacity to feel fear or confidence.
You engage in Energeia: You repeatedly practice facing your fears in daily life.
You achieve Hexis: Courage becomes a fixed, beautiful, and stable part of your character.
Would you like to see how this transition applies to a specific virtue like courage or generosity, or explore how Aristotle links dynamis to metaphysics?
135 comments:
Little confusion or lack of clarity on this. After all the facts institutional confinement as well intense psycho-therapy combined with compassionate understanding is the sensible course.
bs
Comments are working again? Teaching people to know themselves again, to respect themselves by not "acting out" hubristically
Well.
You can see my try to teach you.
At known to you place. ;-)
But.
People -- do not like to be teached.
Bear with it. ;-p
BS?
Perhaps among those who refuse to be open to reality.
Like you? ;-p
Moron that thinking that sudden phony following of some eastern orthodoxy... makes it guru of open-mindness. ))))
Reality is a million imitators.
Nemesis punishes hubris for a reason. People today believe that they are all Dynamis, when Hexis is the key to "knowing yourself". And when they fail, Nemesis steps in..
Limit defines character. Profilicity is a trap... an excess.
Some masks should never been worn.
Like Walter White wearing Heisenberg.
This mass hysteria psychosis needs to be nipped in the bud.
Socrates could have escaped. Instead, he took the hemlock. He "knew himself".
;p
One stands a shot at primordial compassion and wisdom when they let go of all they thought they knew.
Like... with becoming... cretin? ;-p
Socrates was old... and fed up with humanity. Yawn.
PS So much for "multi-temporality" bragging. Already forgot being young? ;-p
Dumb ass, knowladge is not only un your mind. It carwed into one's body.
How do you propose to get rid of THAT???
Suicide? ;-p
You stooopid. You know NORHING about bugghism.
Yawn
You can't teach virtue... it can only be learned.
like me...
You're in a mood, Q... did somebody cancel your Yoga class?
Row row row your boat gently down the stream.
Merrily merrily merrily merrily life is but a dream.
The way is long and the path winding. But if you stay the course liberation awaits.
Ya have a bang up Sunday. S hear...
Got something out of that discssion(s)? in DiDi's (Dave Dubya) blog?
How many of your comments he blocked? ;-p
)))))
That is your way to reach nirvana? ;-p
Ignore reality. )))
Continue-continue.
You think *I*
not fed up??? ))))
For what? ;-p
It is not first order.
Or even not a need at all.
Like same with knowung Truth. ;-p
Naaah.
No fumes.
It was pre-dick-table... that it will ignore that uneasy question.
Adapting group 'virtue' norms for personal use isn't 1st order?
Just follow the herd...
Are you an old man who provides no value to Society except as a "consumer"? It's time I went to the Thanatorium.
He actually generously posted all my comments. He really wants to talk, but I don't have time for him. I'd have to break him from decades of bran washing.
Dave M is a much better prospect. W is too far gone.
//I'd have to break him from decades of bran washing.
You are mistaken. Yawn.
He is not intellectually dishonest or cowardly.
He is honestly lying.
Same as previous case -- DiBi.
Have I provided value???
I still unsure.
Yawn.
So what's the difference with instincts impinted by Evilution?
Yawn.
Here you have it.
Yes, critical thinking includes the ability to evaluate and question your own thoughts, but it is much broader than just finding fault.
What Self-Evaluation MeansThinking about your own thinking is called metacognition. It is a core part of critical thinking. It means you look inward to check your mental process.
Spotting bias: You look for hidden preferences that might skew your view.
Questioning assumptions: You ask why you believe a certain idea.
Checking sources: You trace where your facts came from to see if they are trustworthy.
What Critical Thinking Is Not
Many people confuse being "critical" with being negative.
It does not mean complaining or doubting everything you see.It does not mean trying to prove yourself or others wrong all the time.It is an objective tool used to make reliable judgments based on solid evidence.
The Main Goal
The goal of critical thinking is to find the truth and make good decisions. Criticizing your own thoughts helps you drop false beliefs and make better choices
Go post this to DiDi, and look how he will not disclose it.
Or will try to subvert it.
Wow!! A sensible and truthful comment. Bravo!
I'm impressed. Didn't think ya had it in ya. :)-
A disruption in the human sense of smell and re-functioning of the structures that once calculated directionality in "space" to directionality in "time". An aberation unique to homo-SAPIENs.
That is not I (not)having it in me the problem.
That is you NOT having it in you --are the one.
Like your inability to answer question to topic YOU YOURSELF started -- so what is the way to RISE salary?
In his psychoanalytic theory of human evolution, Sigmund Freud posited that the diminution of the sense of smell—triggered by humans adopting an upright, bipedal posture—served as the critical catalyst for organic repression. This structural shift ultimately enabled human civilization, order, and advanced planning abilities. [1] (https://www.encyclopedia.com/psychology/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/smell-sense), [2] (https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/freuds-thinking/culture/4DAB48F03A327B32014549FF02F6E310), [3] (https://genius.com/Sigmund-freud-civilization-and-its-discontents-chap-4-annotated), [4] (https://pep-web.org/search/document/PAQ.028.0307A)Freud outlines this speculative evolutionary chain primarily in the footnotes of his seminal work, Civilization and Its Discontents (1930), mapping out how transitioning away from olfaction allowed humans to develop higher cognitive delay-and-planning mechanisms: [1] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRaaYMwYbMc&t=674), [2] (https://pep-web.org/search/document/PAQ.028.0307A), [3] (https://genius.com/Sigmund-freud-civilization-and-its-discontents-chap-4-annotated)1. Bipedalism and the Decline of SmellWhen early human ancestors transitioned to an upright posture (bipedalism), their primary sensory orientation shifted away from the ground. Quadrupedal animals live in a sensory world dominated by olfaction (smelling tracking scents, excrement, and pheromones on the earth). By standing tall, the human head was lifted into the air, making vision the paramount sense while the importance of olfactory stimuli drastically decreased. [1] (https://www.david-howes.com/senses/freudsnose.html), [2] (https://www.encyclopedia.com/psychology/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/smell-sense), [3] (https://genius.com/Sigmund-freud-civilization-and-its-discontents-chap-4-annotated)2.
The Shift from Immediate Impulse to Repression
For animals, strong olfactory cues—especially those tied to mating, menstruation, and waste—trigger immediate, automatic behavioral responses. Freud argued that because odors bypass conscious reflection, an animal cannot easily ignore a scent; it must act on its instinct. [1] (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12203381/), [2] (https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/16/1/86), [3] (https://www.encyclopedia.com/psychology/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/smell-sense)
However, as vision replaced smell, those intense, proximity-based bodily odors became associated with shame and disgust rather than automatic attraction. This triggered what Freud termed "organic repression". Instead of immediately acting out an instinctual drive based on a passing scent, the human psyche learned to bury, redirect, or delay the impulse. [1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilization_and_Its_Discontents), [2] (https://www.encyclopedia.com/psychology/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/smell-sense), [3] (https://genius.com/Sigmund-freud-civilization-and-its-discontents-chap-4-annotated), [4] (https://pep-web.org/search/document/PAQ.028.0307A)3.
How Repression Created Planning and Civilization
By learning to repress immediate animalistic desires (the Pleasure Principle), the human mind developed the capability to operate under the Reality Principle. Freud argued that this newly unlocked capacity to delay gratification is the exact foundation of human planning and civilization: [1] (https://pressbooks.cuny.edu/philosophyashorthistory3/chapter/__unknown__-5/), [2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilization_and_Its_Discontents)
Time-Independent Thinking: Because visual and abstract stimuli could be processed, rationalized, and put off, humans were no longer trapped by the immediate "now" of a sensory smell. [1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilization_and_Its_Discontents)
Founding of the Family: In animals, sexual excitation is cyclical and bound to periodic scent triggers. Freud theorized that because humans repressed these scent triggers, sexual excitation became constant and visual, leading to permanent partner bonds and the founding of organized families. [1] (https://genius.com/Sigmund-freud-civilization-and-its-discontents-chap-4-annotated)Cleanliness and Order: The cultural drive toward cleanliness and hygiene stems directly from the organic repression of anal-olfactory pleasures, transforming primitive impulses into structured, planned societal order. [1] (https://pep-web.org/search/document/PAQ.028.0307A)In essence, Freud believed that by lifting our noses off the ground, we broke the cycle of immediate biological reaction, giving birth to the internal mental space required to project, organize, and plan for the future.
I *exactly* DO HAVE doubts.
I revealed before you MY line of thoughts -- concerning workers vs capitalists.
For you maybe to fund caveats in it.
Means -- I not only SELF-critical. I totally open and even seeking for criticuzm from outside.
And what did you?
Yes. You runned away from answering.
PS "The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt," by the philosopher Bertrand Russell.
Means.
I'm smart and therefore self-doubting.
And you... heh, but you know the answer in your heart.
Yawn.
The septal nuclei also allowed us to re-direct the "disgust" feature of smell (rotten-bad) towards other objects (not food) and become more discerning as to things "good" and "bad" (we ate from the fruit of the tree of knowledge of good & evil, as the Bible would put it in Genesis).
Yeah.
And?
We no longer follow the herd. We're all nihilist penguins...
@@
He have no blog...
Life is absurd. Is there value in absurdity? Is there a "beyond the pleasure principle"? Isn't that "beyond" Eros, THANATOS?
Why does Ukraine keep fighting? The unexamined Life is not worth Living?
Good for him! He's not building a "profile" (profilicity).
Wishful thinking requires a strong commitment to "genuine pretending". Know what a "conservative" is? A liberal who has been mugged.
I already made the argument Critical Thinking vs Critical Theory (and he posted it). I doubt he see's the parallel, though.
That "Critical Theory" is the cultural product of the Left, not the Right.
Critical theory is a broad social, political, and philosophical approach that aims to critique, analyze, and transform society by uncovering hidden power structures and ideologies. [1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory), [2] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNkAkwrsIdU)
Origins and Key Figures
The Frankfurt School: The term originates primarily from the Institute for Social Research at Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany, founded in the 1920s. [1] (https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-theory/), [2] (https://iep.utm.edu/critical-theory-frankfurt-school/)
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent full of doubt - Bertrand Russell
So, oh wise sage, what then to say about cocksure trump. The malignant narcissist and pathological liar?
Just curious, oh wise one.
Not wise. Just smart,
Go consult with vocabularies, if unsure what word means what.
Yawn.
But wait, you are one stooopid man -- who as all stooopid are cocksure and will never do such thing.
dRump -- not president of my country.
Why should I bother?
Yaaaawn
You think I all-knowing?
And must be all-answering?
In stead of all dumb asses of the World???
Who am I to you? %^O
Gawd of Stupidity??? (in Japanese sense ))))
Self-deception -- deep tarpit.
Yawn
But... he is not accessible too... yawn.
Depends on your framework (conditioning)
To be able to see across frameworks -- one needs meta-thinking.
Without it... it just a quarrel about which side of egg to hit (Swift)
Yaaaaaaen
No? Do you ever fish?
You have a grudge against Big-Enders?
...or have you simply chosen to become a Little-Ender because it suits your lifestyle choices like a meta-modern might?
I choose Deism.
Unless you aren't entirely deceived (doubt the self deception). You hold an "ironic distance" from it (and aren't a "fundamentalist"). Like Hawkeye Pierce (vs Majors Burns & Hoolihan) on MASH.
Aren't you a Palantir holder? Oh wait, that's just the internet... my bad.
...cuz Kamala had half Trump's ability... LOL!
As anticipated actually. You not smart
Not wise. But you are corkscrew. LMAO!!
Very smart if you... not.
Yawn.
What we have here -- you amused itself with own imaginary smartness..
but still remain borungly stooopid lame ass. ;-p
Devoid of any crutical thinking.
Yet less, rational reasoning.
Yawn.
But, continue-continue, digging your own g$ave.
Kammala?
Whose zat? ;-p
It all false.
One need to understand scientifically based principles of our cognition.
One CANNOT stop self-deception with sheer willforce.
That is -- self -deceotiin.
Only with becoming smarter... you be able to see that wall and jump over it.
Remaining stu.... well, not that smart -- you'll just continue walking in that labirinth.
Yawn.
//You have a grudge against Big-Enders?
You *really* want to live inside that story??? %^)
//I choose Deism.
Yep.
You choose labirinth of sekf-deceotion.
But, if that is your chouce -- that is YOUR choice.
Remember that text of Lem?
About virtual world and "people" inside.
Where rhey may thought about having choice -- while for outside observer that "choice" -- is just a ore-defined track.
Yawn.
Limits define character. What limits you? Tech?
That's true for involuntary self-deceptions. But I'm saying that you can voluntarily choose to embrace a deception, and apply to yourself and your span of action as a "limit"... a red line.
...like Socrates and the Hemlock.
...or Les and his Buddhism
I not be a grave digger. Nor are you. But you do seem to bury your own mind in the gibberish of ruling elite.
Have a good day now, ya hear?
I... just gave you a chance to at yourself from outside -- that you spouting only propagandistic nonsense.
But you, don't wanna,,.
well, whatever...
have a goid day, cretin.
Yawn.
Can you take a sheet of paper.
Take a pen.
And write something like that.
Big bold "Hypothesis"
"What if this opponent (me) are foreigner?
What would be his behavior?
What woukd be his interests?"
If that is toom hard to write it right away -- make step aside "What if I'd be foreigner in foreign country? What would be my knowladge? What would be my interests?"
Yaaaawn.
PS Do not propose it to Lessy -- cause see it now -- totally useless.
//But I'm saying that you can voluntarily choose to embrace a deception, and apply to yourself and your span of action as a "limit"... a red line.
If you know how to acvomplush that.
Voluntarily.
You are wise sage of caliber unknown before...
but, that is just self-deceotion again.
Yawn
Why I so "cicksure"?
Because I am programmer.
And know SHEER AMOUNT of problems that introduce such type of self-referencial stuff.
To the level -- that there is NO system caoable if it .. yet.
Same as orher humans.
"Socrates are mortal"(tm)
Thanks for your intention of giving me a chance...
But I'm good. Been through the propaganda fields of reichwing thought.
Decided after much meditation and contemplation it is mostly ego cherishing gidderish and self centered selfishness.
I already know that you chose "self centered selfishness".
But never the less -- I cheering for you admitting it so openly.
Yawn.
Gosh, you really are ignorant.
Oh well... enjoy your day.
Isn't your tech the vehicle for moving beyond your own mortality, if only that your name be remembered?
Socrates didn't need tech to do that.
Socrates became immortal (tm)
Unlimited? What would "define" it then? The point is to define a system, and give it "purpose".
To carve off a piece of the unlimited, and impose limit upon it. Give it "character". Shape its' "soul"..
You don't go to University to learn "everything". You go to learn on particular thing in detail, and the rest, merely "generally" (context). Math or language.
)))))
You are so funny, cretin.
But, continue-continue your cretinic escapaded, little minkey,())
Empathy being his "stated" core focus....you'd think he'd be good at that. @@
Before Les became his current profile, he called himself "Rational Nation". He believes himself no longer to be a collective, but an individual... or as Deleuze & Guattari would call, a "dividual"...and I would call, a "progressive".
Les is like a jackal in Kafka's "Jackals & Arabs"... he doesn't see the hypocrisy in his self-professed purity. Democrats are Jackals, Republicans are Arabs...
The hypocrisy of "purity" in "dependency". and condemnation of those upon which one is dependent (ie - "the rich"... "the oligarchs"... the "billionaires". who provide the jobs and salaries....
and ultimately reject the protego ergo obligo reciprocity implied.
That... I don't care 'bout.
What bothers me -- how your peers subceptable to propaganda of enemies of USA.
And not that dumb.,. "arabs", d( no% @ant to understand -- enemirs, will not give you as much time and slack iff as Japanese and Germans did.
Because they KNOW... that between them and total victory -- it's when Whole Wirld will fall to their feets.
Is just USA.
You are... toom emphatic. ;-p
//Unlimited? What would "define" it then? The point is to define a system, and give it "purpose".
That is exactly that goal Lem stated -- it need to be find out.
//Socrates didn't need tech to do that.
He did not used rethoric? ;-p
He just was mumbling unconcisely
And that's why wise people was outraged by it, and killed him
...blame the victim... ;)
But he accuses me of lacking empathy... I must lack an "Over" emphatic nature.... Like Noface.
They don't all just want to eat camel and be whipped?
What the people want or think (by being influenced) doesn't really matter, as the USIC is running the show, and largely independent of what even the President thinks or directs.
French also thought themself invincible.
With their Majinot fortresses.
And then sucked biggly.
Who knows, maybe that is time for USA to suck.
"Who knows, only time"(c)
Naaah.
He is biggly stupid.
Think that emphaty and simpathy mean the same.
Yaaaawn.
Nazis was very emphatic of jews -- that made am very capable in exterminating of em.
Never said I was pure. I recognize the many delusions that the ego mind generates. On a never ending basis. Thus there at least a possibility of recognizing truth and achieving liberation.
But thanks for your assumed insight. I know they come from what YOU believe to be.
Truth is subjective. Beliefs are subjective. Life itself, subjective. Always the ego of self protection works to protect ones subjectivity and reified beliefs.
No one, except perhaps the fully awakened and enlighted escape the treadmill of desire, grasping, clinging, aversion, judgement, etc. Realizing this does not make one pure. It simply gives them a chance at truth and full liberation from samsara, he'll on earth.
But thanks again for the opportunity to express my truth(s). As subjective as they may be in your view.
Ya have a good a afternoon.
Nirvana is for people who are still alive. Parinirvana is for the dead...
Millions of Mahayana Buddhists observe Parinirvana Day annually on February 15th as a solemn time to meditate on impermanence (anicca).
"Molon labe" said the king behind his castle walls.
"I'm here to take", said the dragons...
:)
The Buddha’s Parable of the Raft warns against self-deception by showing that even useful teachings must be left behind once they serve their purpose, rather than clung to as absolute truths. [1] (https://www.youtube.com/shorts/iCB9jiyErtE), [2] (https://canadiancor.com/buddhism-and-self-deception/)The Parable of the Raft
The Crossing: A traveler reaches a wild, dangerous river and builds a raft from branches and leaves to cross safely to the secure other shore. [1] (https://www.youtube.com/shorts/iCB9jiyErtE)
The Release: Once across, the Buddha asks if the man should carry the heavy raft on his back as he continues his journey. The man answers no; he must leave it behind. [1] (https://www.facebook.com/GretchenRubin/posts/a-famous-buddhist-teaching-story-the-parable-of-the-raft/1316806206474545/), [2] (https://www.youtube.com/shorts/iCB9jiyErtE)
The Meaning: The raft represents the Dharma (the Buddha's teachings). The teachings are meant for crossing over suffering, not for holding onto as dogmatic identities or permanent possessions. [1] (https://www.youtube.com/shorts/iCB9jiyErtE)
The Danger of Self-Deception
Clinging to Concepts: Mistaking the tool (the raft) for the ultimate reality is a form of self-deception. Clinging to spiritual concepts as if they are the truth itself traps the mind. [1] (https://www.dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?t=36915), [2] (https://canadiancor.com/buddhism-and-self-deception/)
Conventional vs. Ultimate Truth: Buddhism notes that while we intellectually know things are impermanent, our emotional self-deception attaches us to conventional ideas like a permanent "self". [1] (https://www.buddhisma2z.com/content.php?id=18), [2] (https://canadiancor.com/buddhism-and-self-deception/)
True Freedom: Real awakening requires relinquishing even the conceptual framework that helped you arrive, remaining empty of fixed views and open to reality
;p
// I recognize the many delusions that the ego mind generates.
Go google "list of *cognitive* biases."
First of all -- one you need to kniw from school -- Blind Spot.
What I mean -- it absolutely NOT enough to know about your biases.
It do not fix em. They unfixable by design.
//Thus there at least a possibility of recognizing truth and achieving liberation.
Naah
There is none, and you still stooopid and self-deluded man.
Yawn.
Because homo sapiens -- made stooopid bt Evilution.
By design.
And you are stupid unredeamably, if you think that just with declaring itself being above or aside of it -- you can pretend NOT being naked tailless monkey. Stooopid as any of us homi not that sapiens are.
After firearms... you can sit in your castle as long as you want.
We'll just deny you goung out of it. ;-p
//Truth is subjective.
Yawn.
BS.
But, fittung for such a cretin as you are.
//No one, except perhaps the fully awakened and enlighted escape the treadmill of desire, grasping, clinging, aversion, judgement, etc.
That's exactly NOT what Gautama was teaching.
He tout Golden Path.
Yawn.
//The Buddha’s Parable of the Raft warns against self-deception by showing that even useful teachings must be left behind once they serve their purpose, rather than clung to as absolute truths.
Bungo!
Because Truth... is akways out there. ;-)
Whatever.
I know that they treat Buddha the same as we Jesus the Saver.
And that is enough for me.
"Knowing few principles spares from need... ;-p
???
I don't see that you got my sarcasm here.
Or, if got -- in a way I do nor get.
Yawn.
Happy you found Wikipedia.
University coirse about religions, actually.
But I happy that you revealed level of your sources so boldly, cretin. ;-p
Rhetoric didn't get Socrates into trouble. Logic and dialectic did.
Or worse, anyone else coming in.
The catepillar's problem was that it had the wrong values. The butterfly it turned into ultimately had the "true" ones..... @@
...he became enlighted and escaped the treadmill of desire, grasping, clinging, aversion, judgement, etc. of his catepillar form through empathy for flying creatures.
Your source, not mine.
Yo, cretin.
I just stated mine -- university course.
But you crtinicly bent on ignoring reality.
Yawn.
But... c(ntinue-continue, confirming your cretinity.
Or... that was a lie.
A deceptive distortion of his words, of his teachings. ;-p
Stupid-stipid lord. Which dunno that life of a castle NEEDS all that "anyone else".
Yawn.
Sure bozo, whatever your pinched mind says.
LMAO!
)))))
Yo, cretin!
You think your miserly tryes to wound me verbally working???))))
Sure thing that is exactly what you think)))
But.,. continue-continue your miserly tryes more, MORE, MOAAAAR!!! %^O
Naaah.
Rethoric exactly.
Logic -- do not work on crowds.
Dialectic =- was not even invented.
What he did suvveed -- that is with pissing that crowd off.
And I think -- he did it deliberately.
To make it his intelkectual heritage.
Out of shallow pride (same as what Lem did with gravure on his tomb)
"Feci quod potui, faciant meliora potentes'
Or as Samuel Beckett would say, "Fail. Fail again. Fail better."
Post a Comment